Paper · 1995 · PubMed

Effects and carry-over benefits of nematicides in soil planted to a sweet corn-squash-vetch cropping system.

A W Johnson; R A Leonard

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of irrigation on the efficacy of nematicides on Meloidogyne incognita race 1 population densities, yield of sweet corn, and the carry-over of nematicidal effect in the squash crop were determined in a sweet corn-squash-vetch cropping system for 3 years. Fenamiphos 15G and aldicarb 15G were applied at 6.7 kg a.i./ha and incorporated 15 cm deep with a tractor-mounted rototiller. Ethylene dibromide (EDB) was injected at 18 kg a.i./ha on each side of the sweet corn rows (total 36 kg a.i./ha) at planting for nematode control. Supplemental sprinkler irrigation (1.52-4.45 cm), applied in addition to natural rainfall (4.60-10.80 cm) within l0 days after application of nematicides, did not affect nematicide efficacy against M. incognita or yield of sweet corn. Soil treatment with fenamiphos, EDB, and aldicarb increased the number and total weight of sweet corn ears and the weight per ear each year over untreated controls (P </= 0.05). All nematicides provided some control of M. incognita on squash planted after sweet corn, but yields were consistently greater and root-gall indices lower on squash following sweet corn treated with fenamiphos than other nematicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental sprinkler irrigation did not affect nematicide efficacy against Meloidogyne incognita.

Taxon
sweet corne1
Treatment
Supplemental sprinkler irrigatione1
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome
nematicide efficacy against M. incognitae1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Supplemental sprinkler irrigation (1.52-4.45 cm), applied in addition to natural rainfall (4.60-10.80 cm) within l0 days after application of nematicides, did not affect nematicide efficacy against M. incognita or yield of sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental sprinkler irrigation did not affect yield of sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne1
Treatment
Supplemental sprinkler irrigatione1
Outcome
yield of sweet corne1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Supplemental sprinkler irrigation (1.52-4.45 cm), applied in addition to natural rainfall (4.60-10.80 cm) within l0 days after application of nematicides, did not affect nematicide efficacy against M. incognita or yield of sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil treatment with fenamiphos, EDB, and aldicarb increased the number, total weight and weight per ear of sweet corn ears over untreated controls.

Taxon
sweet corne2
Treatment
Soil treatment with fenamiphos, EDB, and aldicarbe2
Outcome
number and total weight of sweet corn ears and the weight per eare2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
each yeare2
Comparator
untreated controlse2

Verbatim

e2

“Soil treatment with fenamiphos, EDB, and aldicarb increased the number and total weight of sweet corn ears and the weight per ear each year over untreated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All nematicides provided some control of Meloidogyne incognita on squash planted after sweet corn.

Taxon
squashe3
Treatment
nematicidese3
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae3pest
Outcome
control of M. incognita on squashe3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“All nematicides provided some control of M. incognita on squash planted after sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1040 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields on squash following sweet corn treated with fenamiphos were consistently greater than with other nematicides.

Taxon
squashe4
Treatment
fenamiphose4
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
greatere4
Comparator
other nematicidese4

Verbatim

e4

“yields were consistently greater and root-gall indices lower on squash following sweet corn treated with fenamiphos than other nematicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-gall indices on squash following sweet corn treated with fenamiphos were lower than with other nematicides.

Taxon
squashe4
Treatment
fenamiphose4
Outcome
root-gall indicese4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
other nematicidese4

Verbatim

e4

“yields were consistently greater and root-gall indices lower on squash following sweet corn treated with fenamiphos than other nematicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1184 · show in text ↑

fenamiphos · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

aldicarb · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

1,2-dibromoethane · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

224 papers in the same direction as this paper · 791 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.