Paper · 1987 · Nematropica

Effects of Fumigant and Nonfumigant Nematicides on Nematode Populations and Yields of Broccoli and Squash in Florida

H. L. Rhoades

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two experiments on broccoli and one on squash were conducted in the spring of 1987 on Myakka fine sand in which soil fumigant nematicides (1,3-dichloropropene and metasodium) and nonfumigant nematicides (carbofuran, ethoprop, and fenamiphos) were tested for efficacy in reducing injury from Belonolaimus longicaudatus, Meloidogyne incognita, and Hoplolaimus galeatus, and increasing crop yields. Both soil fumigants significantly reduced populations of the three nematode species and increased yields. Of the nonfumigants, fenamiphos significantly reduced populations of B. longicaudatus and M. incognita and increased yields. Carbofuran and ethoprop reduced galling caused by M. incognita, but did not consistently reduce populations of B. longicaudatus; however, yields were increased. None of the nonfumigants were effective against H. galeatus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fumigants reduced populations of three nematode species.

Treatment
soil fumigantse0
Outcome
populations of the three nematode speciese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both soil fumigants significantly reduced populations of the three nematode species and increased yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli and Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fumigants increased crop yields.

Taxon
Broccoli and Squasht0
Treatment
soil fumigantse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Both soil fumigants significantly reduced populations of the three nematode species and increased yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli and Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenamiphos reduced B. longicaudatus and M. incognita populations.

Taxon
Broccoli and Squasht0
Treatment
fenamiphose0
Interactor
B. longicaudatusBelonolaimus longicaudatuse0pest
Outcome
populations of B. longicaudatus and M. incognitae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fenamiphos significantly reduced populations of B. longicaudatus and M. incognita and increased yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli and Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenamiphos increased crop yields.

Taxon
Broccoli and Squasht0
Treatment
fenamiphose0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fenamiphos significantly reduced populations of B. longicaudatus and M. incognita and increased yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli and Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran and ethoprop reduced M. incognita galling.

Taxon
Broccoli and Squasht0
Treatment
Carbofuran and ethoprope0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
galling caused by M. incognitae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbofuran and ethoprop reduced galling caused by M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli and Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran and ethoprop did not consistently reduce B. longicaudatus populations.

Taxon
Broccoli and Squasht0
Treatment
Carbofuran and ethoprope0
Interactor
B. longicaudatusBelonolaimus longicaudatuse0pest
Outcome
populations of B. longicaudatuse0
Direction
did not consistently reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Carbofuran and ethoprop reduced galling caused by M. incognita, but did not consistently reduce populations of B. longicaudatus; however, yields were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli and Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran and ethoprop increased yields.

Taxon
Broccoli and Squasht0
Treatment
Carbofuran and ethoprope0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Carbofuran and ethoprop reduced galling caused by M. incognita, but did not consistently reduce populations of B. longicaudatus; however, yields were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli and Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the nonfumigants was effective against H. galeatus.

Taxon
Broccoli and Squasht0
Treatment
nonfumigantse0
Interactor
H. galeatusHoplolaimus galeatuse0pest
Outcome
effective against H. galeatuse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“None of the nonfumigants were effective against H. galeatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli and Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–105 · show in text ↑

fenamiphos · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

carbofuran · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

carbofuran · Meloidogyne incognita · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fenamiphos · Belonolaimus longicaudatus · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fenamiphos · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.