Paper · 2000 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Effect of basal media and growth regulators on thein vitropropagation of apricot (Prunus armenicaL.) cv. Canino

O. Pérez-Tornero; J. M. López; J. Egea; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
45
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryThe effect of different basal media and cytokinin concentration on the proliferation of ‘Canino’ shoots were studied. Among the media where optimum proliferation was obtained, healthier and greener shoots were found when a modified WP medium was used. A BA concentration between 0.5 and 0.6 mg l–1 produced an optimum number of shoots of a good length to be transferred to further subcultures. IBA and NAA induced rooting in similar percentages and with the same number of roots per shoot. The best rooting percentages (92.8 ± 2.5%) were induced in NAA at 2 mg l–1 while the largest number of roots per shoot (5.3 ± 0.5) were obtained after induction of 6 mg l–1 of IBA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modified WP medium produced healthier and greener shoots.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Material
Caninot0
Treatment
modified WP mediume0
Outcome
healthier and greener shootse0
Direction
healthier and greenere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“healthier and greener shoots were found when a modified WP medium was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–257 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot (Prunus armenicaL.) cv. Canino”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA at 0.5–0.6 mg l–1 yielded an optimum number and length of shoots.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Material
Caninot0
Treatment
BA concentration between 0.5 and 0.6 mg l–1e0
Outcome
number of shoots of a good lengthe0
Direction
optimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A BA concentration between 0.5 and 0.6 mg l–1 produced an optimum number of shoots of a good length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–358 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot (Prunus armenicaL.) cv. Canino”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA and NAA induced similar rooting percentages and root numbers per shoot.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Material
Caninot0
Treatment
IBA and NAAe0
Outcome
rooting in similar percentages and with the same number of roots per shoote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IBA and NAA induced rooting in similar percentages and with the same number of roots per shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–495 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot (Prunus armenicaL.) cv. Canino”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 2 mg l–1 induced the best rooting percentage, 92.8 ± 2.5%.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Material
Caninot0
Treatment
NAA at 2 mg l–1e0
Outcome
rooting percentagese0
Direction
beste0
Value
92.8 ± 2.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best rooting percentages (92.8 ± 2.5%) were induced in NAA at 2 mg l–1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–571 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot (Prunus armenicaL.) cv. Canino”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA at 6 mg l–1 produced the largest root number per shoot, 5.3 ± 0.5.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Material
Caninot0
Treatment
6 mg l–1 of IBAe0
Outcome
number of roots per shoote0
Direction
largeste0
Value
5.3 ± 0.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the largest number of roots per shoot (5.3 ± 0.5) were obtained after induction of 6 mg l–1 of IBA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot (Prunus armenicaL.) cv. Canino”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–111 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

N-benzyladenine · growth · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.