Paper · 1997 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

In vitro Propagation of Apricot(Prunus armeniaca L.) cv. 'Bakuoh junkyou'.

Yasuhiro Murai; Hisashi Harada; Hiroyuki Yamashita

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In vitro propagation by dormant, meristem culture of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cv. 'Bakuoh junkyou' was investigated by placing 1 mm shoot tips on four kinds of basal media (WP, MS, B5 and 1/2 MS) with cytokinins. Judging by survival rates and shoot length, the best medium was WP supplemented with BA or CPPU with 100% survival, whereas WP supplemented with 2 ip yielded 80% survival. For shoot proliferation, BA was most effective among 3 kinds of cytokinins tested, whereas zeatin and 2 ip were more effective for shoot elongation. IBA promoted rooting, the optimum being 2 μM; no rooting occurred without IBA treatment. The rooting ability of shoots increased with the number of subcultures; a maximum of 86.7% was attained after the 20 th subculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WP medium supplemented with BA or CPPU gave the best survival of apricot shoot tips, at 100%.

Taxon
Prunus armeniaca L.Prunus armeniacat0
Material
Bakuoh junkyout0
Treatment
WP supplemented with BA or CPPUe1
Outcome
survivale1
Direction
beste1
Value
100%e1
Comparator
WP supplemented with 2 ipe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“In vitro Propagation of Apricot(Prunus armeniaca L.) cv. 'Bakuoh junkyou'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“the best medium was WP supplemented with BA or CPPU with 100% survival, whereas WP supplemented with 2 ip yielded 80% survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WP supplemented with 2 ip gave 80% survival of apricot shoot tips, lower than WP with BA or CPPU.

Taxon
Prunus armeniaca L.Prunus armeniacat0
Material
Bakuoh junkyout0
Treatment
WP supplemented with 2 ipe1
Outcome
survivale1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
80%e1
Comparator
WP supplemented with BA or CPPUe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“In vitro Propagation of Apricot(Prunus armeniaca L.) cv. 'Bakuoh junkyou'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“the best medium was WP supplemented with BA or CPPU with 100% survival, whereas WP supplemented with 2 ip yielded 80% survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA was the most effective cytokinin for shoot proliferation of apricot among the three cytokinins tested.

Taxon
Prunus armeniaca L.Prunus armeniacat0
Treatment
BAe2
Outcome
shoot proliferatione2
Direction
most effectivee2
Comparator
3 kinds of cytokinins testede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“In vitro Propagation of Apricot(Prunus armeniaca L.) cv. 'Bakuoh junkyou'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“For shoot proliferation, BA was most effective among 3 kinds of cytokinins tested, whereas zeatin and 2 ip were more effective for shoot elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeatin and 2 ip were more effective than the other cytokinins for shoot elongation of apricot.

Taxon
Prunus armeniaca L.Prunus armeniacat0
Treatment
zeatin and 2 ipe2
Outcome
shoot elongatione2
Direction
more effectivee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“In vitro Propagation of Apricot(Prunus armeniaca L.) cv. 'Bakuoh junkyou'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“For shoot proliferation, BA was most effective among 3 kinds of cytokinins tested, whereas zeatin and 2 ip were more effective for shoot elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA promoted rooting of apricot shoots, and no rooting occurred without IBA.

Taxon
Prunus armeniaca L.Prunus armeniacat0
Treatment
IBAe3
Outcome
rootinge3
Direction
promotede3
Comparator
without IBA treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“In vitro Propagation of Apricot(Prunus armeniaca L.) cv. 'Bakuoh junkyou'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e3

“IBA promoted rooting, the optimum being 2 μM; no rooting occurred without IBA treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum IBA concentration for apricot rooting was 2 μM.

Taxon
Prunus armeniaca L.Prunus armeniacat0
Treatment
IBAe3
Outcome
rootinge3
Direction
optimum beinge3
Value
2 μMe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“In vitro Propagation of Apricot(Prunus armeniaca L.) cv. 'Bakuoh junkyou'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e3

“IBA promoted rooting, the optimum being 2 μM; no rooting occurred without IBA treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–626 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rooting ability of apricot shoots increased with the number of subcultures, reaching a maximum of 86.7%.

Taxon
Prunus armeniaca L.Prunus armeniacat0
Treatment
number of subculturese4
Outcome
rooting abilitye4
Direction
increasede4
Value
86.7%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“In vitro Propagation of Apricot(Prunus armeniaca L.) cv. 'Bakuoh junkyou'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e4

“The rooting ability of shoots increased with the number of subcultures; a maximum of 86.7% was attained after the 20 th subculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–758 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · growth · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.