Paper · 2011 · TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY

Micropropagation of the apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cv. Hacıhaliloğlu by means of single node culture

HAKAN YILDIRIM; AHMET ONAY; ENGİN TİLKAT; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Hacıhaliloğlu is one of the most widely cultivated apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars in Turkey. It produces fruit of excellent quality and is consumed both fresh and dried. In this study several factors affecting in vitro culture, rapid proliferation, rooting, and acclimatization of the apricot cultivar Hacıhaliloğlu were examined. During this study significant differences in harvesting dates were observed, with the month of May being noted as the best time to examine the in vitro culture of Hacıhaliloğlu. The effects of the cytokinin 6-benzylaminopurine (BA), kinetin (Kin), and thidiazuron (TDZ) were evaluated individually, and different concentrations of BA were also tested. BA levels were tested for their effects on shoot proliferation and 1.0 mg L^{-1} of BA was the most suitable dose for promoting shoot multiplication cultures. The greatest number of shoots (3.42 ± 0.19) was obtained using 2.0 mg L^{-1} of BA; this was significantly greater than that of the control, but there was no significant difference in the mean obtained with 1 mg L^{-1} of BA. The effect of a carbon source on shoot proliferation was studied by using glucose, sucrose, fructose, and lactose at the 3.0% concentration. Sucrose resulted in better shoot proliferation than the other sugar varieties tested. The best rooting percentage was obtained on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 2.0 mg L^{-1} of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA). The regenerated plants were successfully transferred to soil. Herein a simple and effective method is reported for the micropropagation of the apricot cv. Hacıhaliloğlu from adult plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

May was the best harvesting time for in vitro culture.

Taxon
apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)Prunus armeniacat0
Material
Hacıhaliloğlue0
Outcome
best timee0
Value
Maye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“month of May being noted as the best time to examine the in vitro culture of Hacıhaliloğlu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–516 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA at 1.0 mg L^{-1} was considered most suitable for shoot multiplication cultures.

Taxon
apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)Prunus armeniacat0
Treatment
1.0 mg L^{-1} of BAe0
Outcome
shoot multiplication culturese0
Direction
most suitablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1.0 mg L^{-1} of BA was the most suitable dose for promoting shoot multiplication cultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BA at 2.0 mg L^{-1} produced 3.42 ± 0.19 shoots, significantly more than control.

Taxon
apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)Prunus armeniacat0
Treatment
2.0 mg L^{-1} of BAe0
Outcome
number of shootse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
3.42 ± 0.19e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greatest number of shoots (3.42 ± 0.19) was obtained using 2.0 mg L^{-1} of BA; this was significantly greater than that of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot number at 2.0 mg L^{-1} BA did not differ significantly from that at 1 mg L^{-1} BA.

Taxon
apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)Prunus armeniacat0
Treatment
2.0 mg L^{-1} of BAe0
Outcome
meane0
Comparator
1 mg L^{-1} of BAe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest number of shoots (3.42 ± 0.19) was obtained using 2.0 mg L^{-1} of BA; this was significantly greater than that of the control, but there was no significant difference in the mean obtained with 1 mg L^{-1} of BA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose gave better shoot proliferation than the other sugars tested.

Taxon
apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)Prunus armeniacat0
Treatment
Sucrosee0
Outcome
shoot proliferatione0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other sugar varieties testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sucrose resulted in better shoot proliferation than the other sugar varieties tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MS medium with 2.0 mg L^{-1} IBA gave the best rooting percentage.

Taxon
apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)Prunus armeniacat0
Treatment
Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 2.0 mg L^{-1} of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA)e0
Outcome
rooting percentagee0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“best rooting percentage was obtained on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 2.0 mg L^{-1} of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1442 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regenerated plants transferred successfully to soil.

Taxon
apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)Prunus armeniacat0
Outcome
successfully transferred to soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“regenerated plants were successfully transferred to soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1504 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–53 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · growth · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.