Paper · 2012 · American Journal of Plant Sciences

Broadleaf Weed Control and Crop Safety with Premixed Pyrasulfotole and Bromoxynil in Winter Wheat

Seshadri S. Reddy; Phillip W. Stahlman; Patrick W. Geier; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

For more than two decades acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibiting herbicides have been the major weed control tools in winter wheat which resulted in selection of resistant weeds to those herbicides. Premix of pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil (Huskie?), a relatively new herbicide, was registered for use in wheat in 2008. Pyrasulfotole inhibits 4-hydoxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) enzyme in susceptible plants and is the first significant new mode of action for use in cereals for more than two decades. Field experiments were conducted from 2007 to 2010 at two locations in Kansas, USA to test the efficacy of pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil for broadleaf weed control and crop safety in winter wheat. Treatments included pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil alone at 253 g·ai·ha-1 and tank mixtures of pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil at 207 g·ai·ha-1 with MCPA at 280 g·ai·ha-1, dicamba at 140 g·ai·ha-1 or metsulfuron-methyl at 4.2 g·ai·ha-1. Herbicides were applied postemergence in fall and spring seasons. Pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil alone or in combination with tank-mix partners, regardless of application time, controlled flixweed, blue mustard, bushy wallflower and field pennycress 98% or more. Henbit control was better when pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil treatments were applied in fall than spring (≥98% vs ≥67%). Pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil alone applied in spring was not effective on wild buckwheat, but tank mixing with dicamba or metsulfuron-methyl controlled it 84% or more. Pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil alone or as tank mixture caused little (≤7%) or no injury to wheat and the injury did not influence wheat grain yields. Based on excellent control of broadleaf weeds evaluated, pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil is an alternative tool to control ALS-inhibitor resistant weeds in winter wheat. Fall season application and tank mixing with other herbicides are desirable for effective and broad spectrum weed control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynil alone or in tank mixes controlled four broadleaf weeds by at least 98%, independent of application time.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil alone or in combination with tank-mix partnerse0
Interactor
flixweed, blue mustard, bushy wallflower and field pennycresse0weed
Outcome
controlled flixweed, blue mustard, bushy wallflower and field pennycresse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
98% or moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil alone or in combination with tank-mix partners, regardless of application time, controlled flixweed, blue mustard, bushy wallflower and field pennycress 98% or more”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall application controlled henbit better than spring application.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil treatments were applied in falle0
Interactor
HenbitLamium amplexicaulee0weed
Outcome
Henbit controle0
Direction
bettere0
Value
≥98%e0
Qualifier
≥67%e0
Comparator
springe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lamium amplexicaule
Lamium amplexicaule · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Henbit control was better when pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil treatments were applied in fall than spring (≥98% vs ≥67%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring application of the premix alone was ineffective against wild buckwheat.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil alone applied in springe0
Interactor
wild buckwheatFallopia convolvuluse0weed
Outcome
wild buckwheate0
Direction
not effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fallopia convolvulus
Fallopia convolvulus · InteractorAung · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil alone applied in spring was not effective on wild buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mixing the premix with dicamba controlled wild buckwheat by at least 84%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
dicambae0
Interactor
wild buckwheatFallopia convolvuluse1weed
Outcome
wild buckwheate1
Direction
controllede0
Value
84% or moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fallopia convolvulus
Fallopia convolvulus · InteractorAung · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tank mixing with dicamba or metsulfuron-methyl controlled it 84% or more”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1467 · show in text ↑
e1

“wild buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mixing the premix with metsulfuron-methyl controlled wild buckwheat by at least 84%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
metsulfuron-methyle0
Interactor
wild buckwheatFallopia convolvuluse1weed
Outcome
wild buckwheate1
Direction
controllede0
Value
84% or moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fallopia convolvulus
Fallopia convolvulus · InteractorAung · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tank mixing with dicamba or metsulfuron-methyl controlled it 84% or more”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1467 · show in text ↑
e1

“wild buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The premix alone or in tank mixes caused at most 7% wheat injury or none.

Treatment
Pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil alone or as tank mixturee0
Outcome
injury to wheate0
Direction
littlee0
Value
≤7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil alone or as tank mixture caused little (≤7%) or no injury to wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide injury did not influence wheat grain yields.

Treatment
Pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil alone or as tank mixturee1
Outcome
wheat grain yieldse0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the injury did not influence wheat grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1614 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil alone or as tank mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1520 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the premix as an alternative for ALS-inhibitor resistant weeds in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Interactor
ALS-inhibitor resistant weedse0weed
Outcome
alternative tool to control ALS-inhibitor resistant weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pyrasulfotole & bromoxynil is an alternative tool to control ALS-inhibitor resistant weeds in winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1779 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend fall application and tank mixing for effective, broad-spectrum weed control.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Fall season application and tank mixing with other herbicides are desirable for effective and broad spectrum weed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fall season application and tank mixing with other herbicides are desirable for effective and broad spectrum weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑

pyrasulfotole · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

pyrasulfotole · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
    The bromoxynil MCPA tank mixture lowered wild oat control versus MKH 6562 alone or other broadleaf mixtures.

    Control of Wild Oat (Avena fatua) in Wheat with MKH 65621 · 2001 · compared with MKH 6562 applied alone or tank mixed with other broadleaf herbicides

    Opposite direction

  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 10 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

pyrasulfotole · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.