Paper · 1997 · Journal of Vegetable Crop Production

Effects of Dazomet-Granular Fumigant and Mulch for the Production of ‘Sunny’ Tomato

James E. Brown; Timothy N. Motis; James B. Witt; et al.

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT 'Sunny' tomato plants were grown, using four fumigant treatments and three mulch treatments. Fumigants were metham sodium at the rate of 935 l/ha and dazomet at rates of 336 kg/ha, 420 kg/ha and 504 kg/ha. Mulches were 1.25 mil black polyethylene (plastic), a spray-on styrene-butadiene polymer dispersion (Styrofan) sprayed over beds at a rate of 959 l/ha, or none. Plants in all mulch treatments produced similar marketable yields. Neither fumigant had an advantage over the other in yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable tomato yields were similar across all mulch treatments.

Treatment
mulch treatmentse0
Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants in all mulch treatments produced similar marketable yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–441 · show in text ↑
e1

“'Sunny' tomato plants were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither fumigant had a yield advantage over the other.

Treatment
metham sodiume1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
Neither fumigant had an advantagee0
Comparator
dazomete1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither fumigant had an advantage over the other in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–500 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fumigants were metham sodium at the rate of 935 l/ha and dazomet at rates of 336 kg/ha, 420 kg/ha and 504 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“'Sunny' tomato plants were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–41 · show in text ↑

metam-sodium · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sodium atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

mulching · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 44 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.