Paper · 2012 · Acta Agrobotanica

Seed treatment for control leaf spot diseases of spring wheat

Barbara Krzyzińska; Mariola Głazek; Agnieszka Mączyńska

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the years 2001 and 2002 at the Institute of Plant Protection Branch in Sooenicowice research work was performed on seed treatment with fungicides against leaf diseases of spring wheat cv. Ismena caused by pathogenic fungi: Blumeria graminis, Phaeasphaeria nodorum, Puccinia recondita i Pyrenophora tritici-repentis. Two variants of protection were included in the experiment: seed dressing with fungicides or seed dressing and single application of foliar spray at GS 49. At early growth stages of spring wheat a very high biological activity against powdery mildew, septoria leaf spot, brown rust and tan spot was recorded for seed dressing containing triticonazole+prochloraz. In the case of triadimenol+imazalil+fuberidazole only a weak, but long-lasting effect against brown rust and septoria leaf spot was observed. Leaf infection as well as 1000 grain mass and yield, in the experimental combination with using triticonazole+prochloraz were on the same level as in the experimental variant where after seed dressing with triadimenol+imazalil+fuberidazole plots were sprayed with tridemorf+epoxykonazole at GS 49. It was concluded that seed dressing preparation containing triticonazole+prochloraz constituted a good base for protection of spring wheat against foliar diseases.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticonazole plus prochloraz seed dressing had very high early activity against four wheat foliar diseases.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
early growth stagese0
Treatment
seed dressing containing triticonazole+prochloraze0
Outcome
biological activity against powdery mildew, septoria leaf spot, brown rust and tan spote0
Direction
very highe0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At early growth stages of spring wheat a very high biological activity against powdery mildew, septoria leaf spot, brown rust and tan spot was recorded for seed dressing containing triticonazole+prochloraz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triadimenol plus imazalil plus fuberidazole had weak but persistent activity against brown rust and septoria leaf spot.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
triadimenol+imazalil+fuberidazolee0
Outcome
effect against brown rust and septoria leaf spote0
Direction
weake0
Qualifier
long-lastinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the case of triadimenol+imazalil+fuberidazole only a weak, but long-lasting effect against brown rust and septoria leaf spot was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf infection, grain mass and yield under triticonazole plus prochloraz matched the seed dressing and foliar spray combination.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
triticonazole+prochloraze0
Outcome
Leaf infection as well as 1000 grain mass and yielde0
Direction
on the same levele0
Comparator
seed dressing with triadimenol+imazalil+fuberidazole plots were sprayed with tridemorf+epoxykonazole at GS 49e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf infection as well as 1000 grain mass and yield, in the experimental combination with using triticonazole+prochloraz were on the same level as in the experimental variant where after seed dressing with triadimenol+imazalil+fuberidazole plots were sprayed with tridemorf+epoxykonazole at GS 49.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that triticonazole plus prochloraz seed dressing is a good base for wheat foliar disease protection.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
seed dressing preparation containing triticonazole+prochloraze0
Outcome
good base for protection of spring wheat against foliar diseasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was concluded that seed dressing preparation containing triticonazole+prochloraz constituted a good base for protection of spring wheat against foliar diseases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1285 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 65 positive, 5 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.