Paper · 1999 · Israel Journal of Plant Sciences

EFFECTS OF MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA, FUSARIUM OXYSPORUM F.SP. PISI, RHIZOBIUM SP., AND DIFFERENT SOIL TYPES ON GROWTH, CHLOROPHYLL, AND CAROTENOID PIGMENTS OF PEA

Zaki A. Siddiqui; Riaz A. Mir; Irshad Mahmood

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of Meloidogyne incognita, Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. pisi, Rhizobium sp., and different soil types on growth and chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments of pea were examined in single, simultaneous, and sequential inoculations. Soil with a 3:1 (v:v) clay:sand ratio produced the most plant growth and the largest concentrations of chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments when compared with the other soil types. Meloidogyne incognita and F. oxysporum alone caused similar reductions in plant growth and concentrations of chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments while inoculation of the latter pathogen induced wilt symptoms. M. incognita and F. oxysporum interacted to show severe wilt symptoms compared with F. oxysporum alone. In single inoculation, Rhizobium sp. increased plant growth and chlorophyll and carotenoid pigment concentrations while its inoculation with pathogens reduced damage caused by them. Inoculation of Rhizobium sp. prior to pathogens was more effective in reducing damage than simultaneous inoculation. Inoculation of the pathogens prior to Rhizobium sp. resulted in more damage than simultaneous inoculation. F. oxysporum and Rhizobium sp. decreased nematode multiplication. The severity of wilt disease was greatest in 1:3 and 0:4 clay:sand ratio, while least in 3:1 clay:sand mixture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil with a 3:1 clay:sand ratio produced the most pea plant growth and the largest chlorophyll and carotenoid pigment concentrations compared with other soil types.

Treatment
Soil with a 3:1 (v:v) clay:sand ratioe1
Outcome
plant growth and the largest concentrations of chlorophyll and carotenoid pigmentse1
Direction
moste1
Comparator
other soil typese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PIGMENTS OF PEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil with a 3:1 (v:v) clay:sand ratio produced the most plant growth and the largest concentrations of chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments when compared with the other soil types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–412 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum alone caused similar reductions in pea plant growth and chlorophyll and carotenoid pigment concentrations.

Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
Second interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume2pathogen
Outcome
plant growth and concentrations of chlorophyll and carotenoid pigmentse2
Direction
reductionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · Second interactorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PIGMENTS OF PEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita and F. oxysporum alone caused similar reductions in plant growth and concentrations of chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–558 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined M. incognita and F. oxysporum inoculation gave severe pea wilt symptoms, more than F. oxysporum alone.

Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae3pathogen
Second interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume3pathogen
Outcome
severe wilt symptomse3
Comparator
F. oxysporum alonee3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · Second interactorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PIGMENTS OF PEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
e3

“M. incognita and F. oxysporum interacted to show severe wilt symptoms compared with F. oxysporum alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–725 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Fusarium oxysporum induced wilt symptoms in pea.

Interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume2pathogen
Outcome
induced wilt symptomse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PIGMENTS OF PEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita and F. oxysporum alone caused similar reductions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–484 · show in text ↑
e4

“while inoculation of the latter pathogen induced wilt symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single inoculation with Rhizobium sp. increased pea plant growth and chlorophyll and carotenoid pigment concentrations.

Treatment
single inoculatione5
Interactor
Rhizobium sp.Rhizobiume5symbiont
Outcome
plant growth and chlorophyll and carotenoid pigment concentrationse5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PIGMENTS OF PEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
e5

“In single inoculation, Rhizobium sp. increased plant growth and chlorophyll and carotenoid pigment concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium sp. inoculated together with pathogens reduced the damage caused by them to pea.

Treatment
its inoculation with pathogense6
Interactor
pathogense6pathogen
Second interactor
Rhizobium sp.Rhizobiume6symbiont
Outcome
damage caused by theme6
Direction
reducede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PIGMENTS OF PEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
e6

“Rhizobium sp. increased plant growth and chlorophyll and carotenoid pigment concentrations while its inoculation with pathogens reduced damage caused by them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium sp. applied before pathogens reduced damage more effectively than simultaneous inoculation.

Treatment
Inoculation of Rhizobium sp. prior to pathogense7
Interactor
pathogense7pathogen
Second interactor
Rhizobium sp.Rhizobiume7symbiont
Outcome
reducing damagee7
Direction
more effectivee7
Comparator
simultaneous inoculatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PIGMENTS OF PEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
e7

“Inoculation of Rhizobium sp. prior to pathogens was more effective in reducing damage than simultaneous inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculating pathogens before Rhizobium sp. caused more damage to pea than simultaneous inoculation.

Treatment
Inoculation of the pathogens prior to Rhizobium sp.e7
Interactor
pathogense7pathogen
Second interactor
Rhizobium sp.Rhizobiume7symbiont
Outcome
damagee7
Direction
moree7
Comparator
simultaneous inoculatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PIGMENTS OF PEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
e7

“Inoculation of the pathogens prior to Rhizobium sp. resulted in more damage than simultaneous inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1131 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. oxysporum and Rhizobium sp. decreased nematode multiplication on pea.

Interactor
nematodeNematodae1pathogen
Second interactor
Rhizobium sp.Rhizobiume1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode multiplicatione1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
F. oxysporume1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PIGMENTS OF PEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“F. oxysporum and Rhizobium sp. decreased nematode multiplication”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1197 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wilt disease severity in pea was greatest in the 1:3 and 0:4 clay:sand soils.

Treatment
1:3 and 0:4 clay:sand ratioe1
Outcome
severity of wilt diseasee1
Direction
greateste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PIGMENTS OF PEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“The severity of wilt disease was greatest in 1:3 and 0:4 clay:sand ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1271 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wilt disease severity in pea was least in the 3:1 clay:sand mixture.

Treatment
3:1 clay:sand mixturee2
Outcome
severity of wilt diseasee1
Direction
leaste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PIGMENTS OF PEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“The severity of wilt disease was greatest in 1:3 and 0:4 clay:sand ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1271 · show in text ↑
e2

“while least in 3:1 clay:sand mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1309 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · pest · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · Rhizobium · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

inoculation · pest · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.