Paper · 2015 · Journal of Environmental Protection

The Effect of Organo-Mineral Fertilizer Applications on the Yield of Winter Wheat, Spring Barley, Forage Maize and Grass Cut for Silage

Grace H. Smith; Keith Chaney; Charles Murray; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
19
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biosolids were applied with urea to produce a granulated organo-mineral fertiliser (OMF) for application by farm fertiliser equipment to a range of agricultural crops. The recommended rates of nitrogen, phosphate and potash were calculated for the test crops using “The Fertiliser Manual”, which assesses the nutrient requirement based on previous cropping, rainfall and soil index. The OMF produced similar crop yields compared to ammonium nitrate fertiliser when applied as a top-dressing to winter wheat, forage maize and grass cut for silage in the cropping years 2010 to 2014. In 2012 the grain yield of spring barley top-dressed with OMF was significantly lower than the conventional fertiliser treatment, due to dry conditions following application. For this reason it is recommended that OMF is incorporated into the seedbed for spring sown crops and The Safe Sludge Matrix guidelines followed. The experimental work presented shows that OMF can be used in sustainable crop production systems as a source of nitrogen and phosphorus for a range of agricultural crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OMF gave yields of winter wheat similar to ammonium nitrate fertiliser in 2010 to 2014.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
OMFe1
Outcome
crop yieldse1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
ammonium nitrate fertilisere1
Setting
cropping years 2010 to 2014e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The OMF produced similar crop yields compared to ammonium nitrate fertiliser when applied as a top-dressing to winter wheat, forage maize and grass cut for silage in the cropping years 2010 to 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OMF gave yields of forage maize similar to ammonium nitrate fertiliser in 2010 to 2014.

Taxon
forage maizee1
Treatment
OMFe1
Outcome
crop yieldse1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
ammonium nitrate fertilisere1
Setting
cropping years 2010 to 2014e1

Verbatim

e1

“The OMF produced similar crop yields compared to ammonium nitrate fertiliser when applied as a top-dressing to winter wheat, forage maize and grass cut for silage in the cropping years 2010 to 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OMF gave yields of grass cut for silage similar to ammonium nitrate fertiliser in 2010 to 2014.

Taxon
grass cut for silagee1
Treatment
OMFe1
Outcome
crop yieldse1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
ammonium nitrate fertilisere1
Setting
cropping years 2010 to 2014e1

Verbatim

e1

“The OMF produced similar crop yields compared to ammonium nitrate fertiliser when applied as a top-dressing to winter wheat, forage maize and grass cut for silage in the cropping years 2010 to 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2012 the grain yield of spring barley top-dressed with OMF was significantly lower than with the conventional fertiliser, due to dry conditions.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree2
Treatment
top-dressed with OMFe2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
significantly lowere2
Qualifier
due to dry conditions following applicatione3
Comparator
conventional fertiliser treatmente2
Setting
2012e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“In 2012 the grain yield of spring barley top-dressed with OMF was significantly lower than the conventional fertiliser treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–710 · show in text ↑
e3

“due to dry conditions following application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–755 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

It is recommended that OMF is incorporated into the seedbed for spring sown crops.

Taxon
spring sown cropse4
Outcome
incorporated into the seedbede4

Verbatim

e4

“it is recommended that OMF is incorporated into the seedbed for spring sown crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–854 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 473 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

422 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,485 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.