Abstract
Abstract Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production in the Southern Coastal Plain of the U.S. is being impacted by increased use of broiler litter and by conservation tillage. There are no studies on the use of broiler litter for peanut grown in strip tillage and very little information on the use of starter fertilizers. Runner-type peanut was included in a 3 yr, double-cropped, irrigated rotation to determine the effects of broiler litter rates and starter fertilizers on disease development, pod yield, market grade, and gross economic value of runner market type peanut. Broiler litter rates of 0, 4.5, 9.0, and 13.5 Mg/ha were applied to the soil surface without incorporation prior to seeding. Within each broiler litter rate there were three starter fertilizer regimes (none, 93 L10–34–0/ha, and 93 L 12–22–5/ha) each with and without flutolanil {N-[3-(1-methylethoxy) phenyl]-2-(trifluoromethyl) benzamide}applied twice at 1.12 kg ai/ha/application. Over 4 yr, broiler Utter either decreased or did not affect pod yield, market grade, or gross economic value of peanut. Southern stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii) incidence was not affected by broiler litter, but Rhizotonia limb rot (Rhizoctonia solani, AG-4) incidence increased with broiler litter rate, possibly accounting for some of the decreases in production variables. Broiler litter application was neither an agronomic nor economic best management practice for peanut in this strip-tilled study. Flutolanil increased pod yield, market grade, and gross economic value of peanut regardless of broiler litter rate by decreasing the incidence of southern stem rot and Rhizotonia limb rot. Starter fertilizer had little effect on any of the measured parameters.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Broiler litter decreased or did not affect peanut pod yield, market grade and gross economic value over four years.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- broiler Uttere0
- Outcome
- pod yield, market grade, or gross economic valuee0
- Direction
- decreased or did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Over 4 yr, broiler Utter either decreased or did not affect pod yield, market grade, or gross economic value of peanut”
t0“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Broiler litter did not affect southern stem rot incidence.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- broiler littere0
- Interactor
- Sclerotium rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen - Outcome
- Southern stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii) incidencee0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Southern stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii) incidence was not affected by broiler litter”
t0“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizoctonia limb rot incidence increased with broiler litter rate.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- broiler litter ratee0
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solanie0pathogen - Outcome
- Rhizotonia limb rot (Rhizoctonia solani, AG-4) incidencee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Rhizotonia limb rot (Rhizoctonia solani, AG-4) incidence increased with broiler litter rate”
t0“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Broiler litter was neither an agronomic nor economic best management practice in this strip-tilled peanut study.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- Broiler litter applicatione0
- Outcome
- neither an agronomic nor economic best management practicee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Broiler litter application was neither an agronomic nor economic best management practice for peanut in this strip-tilled study”
Claim · model-written summary
Flutolanil increased peanut pod yield, market grade and gross economic value regardless of broiler litter rate.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- Flutolanile0
- Outcome
- pod yield, market grade, and gross economic valuee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- regardless of broiler litter ratee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Flutolanil increased pod yield, market grade, and gross economic value of peanut regardless of broiler litter rate”
Claim · model-written summary
Flutolanil decreased southern stem rot and Rhizotonia limb rot incidence.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- Flutolanile0
- Outcome
- incidence of southern stem rot and Rhizotonia limb rote0
- Direction
- decreasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Flutolanil increased pod yield, market grade, and gross economic value of peanut regardless of broiler litter rate by decreasing the incidence of southern stem rot and Rhizotonia limb rot”
Claim · model-written summary
Starter fertilizer had little effect on measured parameters.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- Starter fertilizere0
- Outcome
- measured parameterse0
- Direction
- little effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Starter fertilizer had little effect on any of the measured parameters”
t0“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
The same questions in other papers
flutolanil · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →flutolanil · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.