Paper · 2001 · Agronomy Journal

Tillage and Pest Management Considerations in a Peanut–Cotton Rotation in the Southeastern Coastal Plain

W. Carroll Johnson; Timothy B. Brenneman; Shelby H. Baker; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
107
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Radical changes in crop production have occurred in the southeastern USA in recent years. Peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) and cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) are now planted in direct rotation, and conservation tillage is commonly used for both crops. Comprehensive data is lacking on crop and pest management recommendations in those systems, so a long‐term study was conducted in Tifton, GA on the effects of tillage systems on crop and pest management in a peanut–cotton rotation. Systems evaluated were conventional, reduced, and minimum tillage. Plots in conventional tillage systems were harrowed, deep‐turned, and planted each year. In reduced tillage systems, plots were harrowed in the fall and planted to rye ( Secale cereale L.), and crops were planted into killed rye. In minimum tillage systems, plots were neither tilled nor planted to rye and remained nontilled during the winter, and crops were planted directly into the previous crop stubble. Weed control was based on species present and tillage system. Peanut was either treated with flutolanil [3′‐isopropoxy‐2‐(trifluoromethyl) benzanilide] for soil‐borne disease control or not treated (control). Yields were sustained for 5 yr with no difference in peanut or cotton yields among tillage systems. Flutolanil controlled soil‐borne diseases and increased peanut yields, working equally well in all three tillage systems. Weed densities and species composition changed, causing more intensive and costly weed control in reduced and minimum tillage systems than in conventional tillage systems. Spotted wilt (tomato spotted wilt tospovirus) incidence was 42% lower in reduced and minimum tillage systems than in conventional tillage systems and is now part of the recommended strategy to manage the disease.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut yields were sustained for five years and did not differ among tillage systems.

Treatment
tillage systemse0
Outcome
peanut or cotton yieldse0
Direction
no differencee0
Value
5 yre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields were sustained for 5 yr with no difference in peanut or cotton yields among tillage systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1266 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yields were sustained for five years and did not differ among tillage systems.

Treatment
tillage systemse0
Outcome
peanut or cotton yieldse0
Direction
no differencee0
Value
5 yre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields were sustained for 5 yr with no difference in peanut or cotton yields among tillage systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1266 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flutolanil controlled soil-borne disease in peanut.

Treatment
Flutolanile0
Outcome
soil‐borne diseasese0
Direction
controllede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flutolanil controlled soil‐borne diseases and increased peanut yields, working equally well in all three tillage systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1388 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flutolanil increased peanut yield equally across the three tillage systems.

Treatment
Flutolanile0
Outcome
peanut yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
equally well in all three tillage systemse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flutolanil controlled soil‐borne diseases and increased peanut yields, working equally well in all three tillage systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1388 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed density and species composition changed under the tillage systems, requiring more intensive and costly weed control in reduced and minimum tillage.

Treatment
reduced and minimum tillage systemse0
Outcome
Weed densities and species compositione0
Direction
changede0
Qualifier
more intensive and costly weed controle0
Comparator
conventional tillage systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed densities and species composition changed, causing more intensive and costly weed control in reduced and minimum tillage systems than in conventional tillage systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1560 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced and minimum tillage lowered spotted wilt incidence by 42% compared with conventional tillage.

Treatment
reduced and minimum tillage systemse0
Interactor
tomato spotted wilt tospovirusOrthotospovirus tomatomaculaee0pathogen
Outcome
Spotted wilt (tomato spotted wilt tospovirus) incidencee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
42%e0
Comparator
conventional tillage systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spotted wilt (tomato spotted wilt tospovirus) incidence was 42% lower in reduced and minimum tillage systems than in conventional tillage systems and is now part of the recommended strategy to manage the disease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1773 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–119 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced and minimum tillage are recommended for managing spotted wilt.

Treatment
reduced and minimum tillage systemse0
Interactor
tomato spotted wilt tospovirusOrthotospovirus tomatomaculaee0pathogen
Outcome
recommended strategy to manage the diseasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spotted wilt (tomato spotted wilt tospovirus) incidence was 42% lower in reduced and minimum tillage systems than in conventional tillage systems and is now part of the recommended strategy to manage the disease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1773 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–119 · show in text ↑

flutolanil · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

tillage · Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.