Paper · 2014 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Agronomic Practices at Low Environmental Impact for Durum Wheat in Mediterranean Conditions

Francesco Montemurro; Michele Maiorana

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The application of conservative agricultural practices such as crop rotation, shallow tillage, and organic fertilizer could usefully sustain crop yield and increase soil fertility, thus playing an important role in the sustainable agriculture. This study was conducted to determine the effects of conservative agronomic practices on yield and quality of wheat. The effects of these practices on soil fertility were further investigated in this four-year study (2005–2008). Two cropping systems, durum wheat in continuous cropping, and in two-year rotation with leguminous crops, were investigated at Foggia (Southern Italy) in rain-fed conditions. Within each cropping system, two levels of crop management were compared: i) conventional, characterized by a higher soil tillage management and mineral fertilizers application; ii) conservative, with a lower soil tillage management and organic-mineral fertilizers. The seasonal weather greatly affected the wheat yield and quality, inducing lower production in years that were characterized by unfavorable climatic conditions. This trend was found when the conventional treatment was applied, both in continuous cropping and rotations. The effects of cropping systems and crop management pointed out the positive role played by the leguminous crops (common vetch and chickpea) in crop rotation. This introduction improved wheat yield in rotation (6.47% compared to the continuous cropping), improved grain protein content (5.88%), and reduced the productive gap between conventional and conservative treatments (9.24 and 14.14% of the wheat in rotation and continuous cropping, respectively). Conversely, the effects of cropping systems and crop management on soil fertility were not very high, since the differences found at the end of the study in total nitrogen values were poor. However, total organic carbon (16.04 and 17.58% for cropping system and crop management, respectively) and available phosphorus values (11.30 and 7.43%) depend on root organic matter contribution, plant biomass residues, and fertilizations. The suitable crop rotation and the sustainable crop management appear important agronomical practices to improve yield and quality of wheat, and may reduce the environmental risks resulting from conventional intensive cropping systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unfavorable seasonal weather lowered wheat production.

Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Setting
unfavorable climatic conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seasonal weather greatly affected the wheat yield and quality, inducing lower production in years that were characterized by unfavorable climatic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1074 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal weather affected wheat quality.

Outcome
qualitye0
Setting
seasonal weathere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seasonal weather greatly affected the wheat yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation with leguminous crops improved wheat yield by 6.47% compared with continuous cropping.

Treatment
rotatione0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
6.47%e0
Comparator
continuous croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This introduction improved wheat yield in rotation (6.47% compared to the continuous cropping)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation improved grain protein content by 5.88%.

Treatment
rotatione1
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
improvede0
Value
5.88%e0
Comparator
continuous croppinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved grain protein content (5.88%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1478 · show in text ↑
e1

“This introduction improved wheat yield in rotation (6.47% compared to the continuous cropping), improved grain protein content (5.88%), and reduced the productive gap between conventional and conservative treatments (9.24 and 14.14% of the wheat in rotation and continuous cropping, respectively). Conversely, the effects of cropping systems and crop management on soil fertility were not very high, since the differences found at the end of the study in total nitrogen values were poor. However, total organic carbon (16.04 and 17.58% for cropping system and crop management, respectively) and available phosphorus values (11.30 and 7.43%) depend on root organic matter contribution, plant biomass residues, and fertilizations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–2072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation reduced the productive gap between conventional and conservative management.

Treatment
rotatione0
Outcome
productive gape0
Direction
reducede0
Value
9.24 and 14.14%e0
Comparator
continuous croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced the productive gap between conventional and conservative treatments (9.24 and 14.14% of the wheat in rotation and continuous cropping, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1640 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping system and management produced small differences in soil total nitrogen at study end.

Outcome
total nitrogen valuese0
Direction
poore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences found at the end of the study in total nitrogen values were poor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1830 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping system related to total organic carbon by 16.04%.

Outcome
total organic carbone0
Value
16.04e0
Setting
cropping systeme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total organic carbon (16.04 and 17.58% for cropping system and crop management, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1841–1934 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop management related to total organic carbon by 17.58%.

Outcome
total organic carbone0
Value
17.58%e0
Setting
crop managemente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total organic carbon (16.04 and 17.58% for cropping system and crop management, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1841–1934 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping system related to available phosphorus by 11.30%.

Outcome
available phosphorus valuese0
Value
11.30e0
Setting
cropping systeme1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available phosphorus values (11.30 and 7.43%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1939–1984 · show in text ↑
e1

“This introduction improved wheat yield in rotation (6.47% compared to the continuous cropping), improved grain protein content (5.88%), and reduced the productive gap between conventional and conservative treatments (9.24 and 14.14% of the wheat in rotation and continuous cropping, respectively). Conversely, the effects of cropping systems and crop management on soil fertility were not very high, since the differences found at the end of the study in total nitrogen values were poor. However, total organic carbon (16.04 and 17.58% for cropping system and crop management, respectively) and available phosphorus values (11.30 and 7.43%) depend on root organic matter contribution, plant biomass residues, and fertilizations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–2072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop management related to available phosphorus by 7.43%.

Outcome
available phosphorus valuese0
Value
7.43%e0
Setting
crop managemente1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available phosphorus values (11.30 and 7.43%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1939–1984 · show in text ↑
e1

“This introduction improved wheat yield in rotation (6.47% compared to the continuous cropping), improved grain protein content (5.88%), and reduced the productive gap between conventional and conservative treatments (9.24 and 14.14% of the wheat in rotation and continuous cropping, respectively). Conversely, the effects of cropping systems and crop management on soil fertility were not very high, since the differences found at the end of the study in total nitrogen values were poor. However, total organic carbon (16.04 and 17.58% for cropping system and crop management, respectively) and available phosphorus values (11.30 and 7.43%) depend on root organic matter contribution, plant biomass residues, and fertilizations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–2072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend suitable rotation and sustainable management to improve wheat yield and quality.

Outcome
suitable crop rotation and the sustainable crop managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The suitable crop rotation and the sustainable crop management appear important agronomical practices to improve yield and quality of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2073–2212 · show in text ↑

rotation · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 23 positive, 9 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 253 positive, 92 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.