Paper · 2012 · Biological Agriculture & Horticulture

Microbial enrichment of vermicompost prepared from different plant biomasses and their effect on rice (Oryza sativaL.) growth and soil fertility

K. Mahanta; D. K. Jha; D. J. Rajkhowa; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Vermicomposts prepared from rice straw, Eichhornia crassipes, Ipomoea carnea, and their mixed biomass, were enriched with microbial inoculants and evaluated for their effect on growth and yield of rice, and nutrient availability and microbial population in soil. Irrespective of the vermicompost sources, significant increases in nitrogen (N) content and microbial population in vermicomposts were recorded after eight weeks of incubation with inoculation of Azotobacter chroococcum, Azospirillum brasilense, and Pseudomonas fluorescens, either alone or in consortia, and the highest increase was observed with A. chroococcum followed by A. brasilense. Among different vermicomposts, Ipomoea vermicompost was found superior in N content and microbial population. Vermicompost enriched with A. chroococcum resulted in the highest improvement in plant growth, grain yield, leaf chlorophyll content and nitrate reductase activity of rice, followed by enrichment with A. brasilense. Nutrient content in plant and organic C, available N, P, K, and CEC in post-harvest soil were also significantly improved by the application of enriched vermicomposts, with the best result obtained with Azotobacter-enriched vermicompost. Overall, the results suggest that the locally available plant biomasses, particularly Ipomoea carnea, a weed abundantly available in northeast India, can be easily converted into an environment-friendly nutrient source by vermicomposting, using plant-growth-promoting microorganisms such as A. chroococcum and A. brasilense.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost enriched with Azotobacter chroococcum gave the highest improvement in plant growth and grain yield of rice, higher than enrichment with Azospirillum brasilense.

Treatment
Vermicompost enriched with A. chroococcume1
Interactor
A. chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume1symbiont
Second interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
plant growth, grain yielde1
Direction
highest improvemente1
Comparator
enrichment with A. brasilensee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their effect on growth and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–201 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vermicompost enriched with A. chroococcum resulted in the highest improvement in plant growth, grain yield, leaf chlorophyll content and nitrate reductase activity of rice, followed by enrichment with A. brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost enriched with Azotobacter chroococcum gave the highest improvement in leaf chlorophyll content and nitrate reductase activity of rice.

Treatment
Vermicompost enriched with A. chroococcume1
Interactor
A. chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume1symbiont
Second interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll content and nitrate reductase activitye1
Direction
highest improvemente1
Comparator
enrichment with A. brasilensee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their effect on growth and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–201 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vermicompost enriched with A. chroococcum resulted in the highest improvement in plant growth, grain yield, leaf chlorophyll content and nitrate reductase activity of rice, followed by enrichment with A. brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Enriched vermicompost significantly improved nutrient content in rice plants, with the best result from Azotobacter-enriched vermicompost.

Treatment
application of enriched vermicompostse2
Outcome
Nutrient content in plante2
Direction
significantly improvede2
Qualifier
best result obtained with Azotobacter-enriched vermicomposte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their effect on growth and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–201 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nutrient content in plant and organic C, available N, P, K, and CEC in post-harvest soil were also significantly improved by the application of enriched vermicomposts, with the best result obtained with Azotobacter-enriched vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1215 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Enriched vermicompost significantly improved organic C, available N, P, K and CEC in post-harvest soil, with the best result from Azotobacter-enriched vermicompost.

Treatment
application of enriched vermicompostse2
Outcome
organic C, available N, P, K, and CEC in post-harvest soile2
Direction
significantly improvede2
Qualifier
best result obtained with Azotobacter-enriched vermicomposte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their effect on growth and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–201 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nutrient content in plant and organic C, available N, P, K, and CEC in post-harvest soil were also significantly improved by the application of enriched vermicomposts, with the best result obtained with Azotobacter-enriched vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1215 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ipomoea vermicompost was superior in N content and microbial population to the other vermicomposts.

Treatment
Ipomoea vermicomposte3
Outcome
N content and microbial populatione3
Direction
superiore3
Comparator
different vermicompostse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their effect on growth and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–201 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among different vermicomposts, Ipomoea vermicompost was found superior in N content and microbial population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation of vermicompost with Azotobacter chroococcum significantly increased N content and microbial population in vermicompost.

Treatment
inoculation of Azotobacter chroococcume4
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume4symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee4symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen (N) content and microbial population in vermicompostse4
Direction
increasese4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluated for their effect on growth and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–201 · show in text ↑
e4

“significant increases in nitrogen (N) content and microbial population in vermicomposts were recorded after eight weeks of incubation with inoculation of Azotobacter chroococcum, Azospirillum brasilense, and Pseudomonas fluorescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–536 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter chroococcum · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 88 positive, 11 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 115 positive, 9 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.