Paper · 2011 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Effect of conjoint use of bio-organics and chemical fertilizers on yield, soil properties under French bean–cauliflower-based cropping system

Satish Kumar Bhardwaj; Som Dev Sharma; Pramod Kumar

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of conjoint use of bio-organics (biofertilizers + crop residues + FYM) and chemical fertilizers on yield, physical–chemical and microbial properties of soil in a ‘French bean–cauliflower’-based cropping system of mid hills of the north-western Himalayan Region (NWHR) of India. Conjoint bio-organics at varied levels of NPK chemical fertilizers increased yield of ‘cauliflower’ over corresponding single application. Incorporation of crop residues with 75% of the recommended NPK application resulted in the highest yield (19 t ha−1). Conjoint use of bio-organics produced a yield (15.65 t ha−1), which was statistically on a par with 75% of the recommended NPK application alone. This indicated a saving of 75% NPK chemical fertilizers. In the case of ‘French bean’, the effect was non-significant. The results also showed significant higher soil available N (351.3 kg ha−1) under 75% NPK + biofertilizers, whereas the highest soil available K (268.3 kg ha−1) was recorded under 75% NPK + crop residues. Lowest bulk density (1.03 Mg m−3), highest water holding capacity (36.5%), soil organic matter (10.6 g kg−1), bacterial (4.13 × 107 cfu g−1) and fungal (6.3 × 107 cfu g−1) counts were recorded under sole application of bio-organics. According to our study, we concluded that the combination of NPK fertilizers and bio-organics increased yield except French bean, soil available N, K and saved chemical fertilizers under ‘French bean–cauliflower’-based cropping system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bio-organics and NPK increased cauliflower yield over corresponding single applications.

Treatment
Conjoint bio-organics at varied levels of NPK chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
yield of ‘cauliflower’e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
corresponding single applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conjoint bio-organics at varied levels of NPK chemical fertilizers increased yield of ‘cauliflower’ over corresponding single application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop residues with 75% recommended NPK gave the highest cauliflower yield of 19 t ha−1.

Treatment
Incorporation of crop residues with 75% of the recommended NPK applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
19 t ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of crop residues with 75% of the recommended NPK application resulted in the highest yield (19 t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conjoint bio-organics yielded 15.65 t ha−1, statistically on par with 75% recommended NPK alone.

Treatment
Conjoint use of bio-organicse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
on a pare0
Value
15.65 t ha−1e0
Comparator
75% of the recommended NPK application alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conjoint use of bio-organics produced a yield (15.65 t ha−1), which was statistically on a par with 75% of the recommended NPK application alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

French bean yield did not show a statistically significant response.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
bio-organics and chemical fertilizerst0
Outcome
effecte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the case of ‘French bean’, the effect was non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–833 · show in text ↑
t0

“bio-organics and chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil available N was significantly higher at 351.3 kg ha−1 with 75% NPK plus biofertilizers.

Taxon
French bean–cauliflowerPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
75% NPK + biofertilizerse0
Outcome
soil available Ne0
Direction
highere0
Value
351.3 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant higher soil available N (351.3 kg ha−1) under 75% NPK + biofertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“French bean–cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil available K peaked at 268.3 kg ha−1 with 75% NPK plus crop residues.

Taxon
French bean–cauliflowerPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
75% NPK + crop residuese0
Outcome
soil available Ke0
Direction
higheste0
Value
268.3 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest soil available K (268.3 kg ha−1) was recorded under 75% NPK + crop residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“French bean–cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole bio-organics had the lowest soil bulk density, 1.03 Mg m−3.

Taxon
French bean–cauliflowerPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
sole application of bio-organicse0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
Loweste0
Value
1.03 Mg m−3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lowest bulk density (1.03 Mg m−3), highest water holding capacity (36.5%), soil organic matter (10.6 g kg−1), bacterial (4.13 × 107 cfu g−1) and fungal (6.3 × 107 cfu g−1) counts were recorded under sole application of bio-organics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“French bean–cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole bio-organics had the highest water holding capacity, 36.5%.

Taxon
French bean–cauliflowerPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
sole application of bio-organicse1
Outcome
water holding capacitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
36.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest water holding capacity (36.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1113 · show in text ↑
e1

“sole application of bio-organics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“French bean–cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole bio-organics had soil organic matter of 10.6 g kg−1.

Taxon
French bean–cauliflowerPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
sole application of bio-organicse1
Outcome
soil organic mattere0
Value
10.6 g kg−1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil organic matter (10.6 g kg−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1148 · show in text ↑
e1

“sole application of bio-organics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“French bean–cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole bio-organics gave bacterial counts of 4.13 × 107 cfu g−1.

Taxon
French bean–cauliflowerPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
sole application of bio-organicse1
Outcome
bacteriale0
Value
4.13 × 107 cfu g−1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial (4.13 × 107 cfu g−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1180 · show in text ↑
e1

“sole application of bio-organics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“French bean–cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole bio-organics gave fungal counts of 6.3 × 107 cfu g−1.

Taxon
French bean–cauliflowerPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
sole application of bio-organicse1
Outcome
fungale0
Value
6.3 × 107 cfu g−1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungal (6.3 × 107 cfu g−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1211 · show in text ↑
e1

“sole application of bio-organics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“French bean–cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–119 · show in text ↑

organic · soil: chemistry · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

organic · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.