Paper · 2019 · Planta Daninha

Cauliflower Cultivars Associated with Urochloa decumbens Straw Mulch in Integrated Weed Management

A.C.S. HIRATA; E.K. HIRATA; A.B. RÓS; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In vegetable farming, the reduction in the use of herbicides has been an important factor in the definition of the production system. The objective of this research was to evaluate crop yield of cauliflower cultivars grown on Urochloa decumbens straw mulch, as well as the effect of the association between straw and cultivars on weed management. The treatments were arranged in a 2 x 4 factorial scheme: two managements (with or without U. decumbens straw mulch) and four cauliflower cultivars (Barcelona, Bromus, Júlia and Lisblanc). The experiment used a randomized block design with four replicates. There was no interference of straw mulch on crop yield of cauliflower cultivars. Hybrids Barcelona and Júlia presented yields of 22.0 and 23.9 t ha-1, respectively, and they did not differ from each other. The Bromus and Lisblanc materials did not adapt to the edaphoclimatic conditions of the region, which resulted in reduced cultural control and high weed emergence after weeding. U. decumbens straw had high control of the weed community (581.2 pls m-2 - without straw and 8.3 pls m-2 - with straw). It is concluded that the U. decumbens straw as mulch is an effective tool in integrated management of weeds in cauliflower crops, without interfering with crop yield, and its potential to control weed community density is approximately 98.6%, at 22 days after transplanting. The adaptability of the cauliflower cultivar to the region has a high impact on weed management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urochloa straw mulch did not affect cauliflower cultivar yield.

Treatment
straw mulche0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
no interferencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no interference of straw mulch on crop yield of cauliflower cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–694 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barcelona yielded 22.0 t ha-1.

Material
Barcelonae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Value
22.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrids Barcelona and Júlia presented yields of 22.0 and 23.9 t ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Júlia yielded 23.9 t ha-1.

Material
Júliae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Value
23.9 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrids Barcelona and Júlia presented yields of 22.0 and 23.9 t ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barcelona and Júlia yields did not differ.

Material
Barcelonae1
Outcome
did not differ from each othere0
Comparator
Júliae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they did not differ from each other.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hybrids Barcelona and Júlia presented yields of 22.0 and 23.9 t ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bromus did not adapt to regional conditions, reducing cultural control and increasing weed emergence.

Material
Bromuse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
reduced cultural control and high weed emergence after weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Bromus and Lisblanc materials did not adapt to the edaphoclimatic conditions of the region, which resulted in reduced cultural control and high weed emergence after weeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lisblanc did not adapt to regional conditions, reducing cultural control and increasing weed emergence.

Material
Lisblance0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
reduced cultural control and high weed emergence after weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Bromus and Lisblanc materials did not adapt to the edaphoclimatic conditions of the region, which resulted in reduced cultural control and high weed emergence after weeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urochloa straw reduced weed density from 581.2 to 8.3 plants per square meter.

Treatment
U. decumbens strawe0
Interactor
weed communitye0weed
Outcome
weed communitye0
Direction
high controle0
Value
8.3 pls m-2e0
Qualifier
581.2 pls m-2e0
Comparator
without strawe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“U. decumbens straw had high control of the weed community (581.2 pls m-2 - without straw and 8.3 pls m-2 - with straw).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors estimate Urochloa straw controls weed density by approximately 98.6% at 22 days after transplanting.

Treatment
Urochloa decumbens straw mulcht0
Interactor
weed communitye0weed
Outcome
weed community densitye0
Direction
controle0
Value
98.6%e0
Qualifier
at 22 days after transplantinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its potential to control weed community density is approximately 98.6%, at 22 days after transplanting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urochloa decumbens straw mulch in Integrated Weed Management”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was no interference of straw mulch on crop yield of cauliflower cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–694 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude regional cultivar adaptability strongly affects weed management.

Material
cauliflower cultivare0
Outcome
weed managemente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The adaptability of the cauliflower cultivar to the region has a high impact on weed management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1489 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

organic · weed · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.