Paper · 2014 · Photosynthetica

Physiological response of wheat varieties to elevated atmospheric CO2 and low water supply levels

S. Bencze; Z. Bamberger; T. Janda; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
32
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In the phytotron experiment, the effect of elevated atmospheric CO2 (EC, 750 μmol mol-1) on the drought tolerance was studied in two winter varieties (Mv Mambo, tolerant; Mv Regiment, moderately tolerant) and in one spring variety of wheat (Lona, sensitive to drought). Changes in net photosynthetic rate (P N), stomatal conductance, transpiration, wateruse efficiency, effective quantum yield of photosystem II, and activities of glutathione reductase (GR), glutathione-Stransferase (GST), guaiacol peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) were monitored during water withdrawal. Drought caused a faster decline of P N at EC, leading to the lower assimilation rates under severe drought compared with ambient CO2 (NC). In the sensitive variety, P N remained high for a longer period at EC. The growth at EC resulted in a more relaxed activation level of the antioxidant enzyme system in all three varieties, with very low activities of GR, GST, APX, and POD. The similar, low values were due to decreases in the varieties which had higher ambient values. A parallel increase of CAT was, however, recorded in two varieties. As the decline in P N was faster at EC under drought but there was no change in the rate of electron transport compared to NC values, a higher level of oxidative stress was induced. This triggered a more pronounced, general response in the antioxidant enzyme system at EC, leading to very high activities of APX, CAT, and GST in all three varieties. The results indicated that EC had generally favourable effects on the development and stress tolerance of plants, although bigger foliage made the plants more prone to the water loss. The relaxation of the defence mechanisms increased potentially the risk of damage due to the higher level of oxidative stress at EC under severe drought compared with NC.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, elevated CO2 caused faster photosynthetic decline and lower assimilation under severe drought than ambient CO2.

Treatment
ECe0
Outcome
P Ne0
Direction
faster declinee0
Qualifier
under severe droughte0
Comparator
ambient CO2 (NC)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought caused a faster decline of P N at EC, leading to the lower assimilation rates under severe drought compared with ambient CO2 (NC).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the sensitive variety, photosynthetic rate stayed high longer at elevated CO2.

Material
sensitive varietye0
Treatment
ECe0
Outcome
P Ne0
Direction
remained high for a longer periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the sensitive variety, P N remained high for a longer period at EC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 lowered GR, GST, APX and POD activity in all three wheat varieties.

Treatment
ECe0
Outcome
activities of GR, GST, APX, and PODe0
Direction
very lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth at EC resulted in a more relaxed activation level of the antioxidant enzyme system in all three varieties, with very low activities of GR, GST, APX, and POD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CAT activity increased in two varieties at elevated CO2.

Gene
CATe0
Outcome
CATe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
two varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A parallel increase of CAT was, however, recorded in two varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1147 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electron transport rate did not change at elevated CO2 under drought versus ambient CO2.

Treatment
elevated atmospheric CO2t1
Outcome
rate of electron transporte0
Direction
no changee0
Comparator
NC valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no change in the rate of electron transport compared to NC values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
t1

“elevated atmospheric CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 under drought induced a higher level of oxidative stress.

Treatment
elevated atmospheric CO2t1
Outcome
oxidative stresse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher level of oxidative stress was induced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
t1

“elevated atmospheric CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, elevated CO2 produced very high APX, CAT and GST activities in all three varieties.

Outcome
activities of APX, CAT, and GSTe0
Direction
very highe0
Qualifier
all three varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leading to very high activities of APX, CAT, and GST in all three varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 generally favored plant development and stress tolerance.

Treatment
ECe0
Outcome
development and stress tolerancee0
Direction
favourable effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EC had generally favourable effects on the development and stress tolerance of plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1610 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larger foliage at elevated CO2 increased susceptibility to water loss.

Organ / stage
foliagee0
Outcome
water losse0
Direction
more pronee0
Qualifier
bigger foliagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bigger foliage made the plants more prone to the water loss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1621–1681 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relaxed defenses could increase oxidative damage risk under severe drought at elevated CO2.

Treatment
EC under severe droughte0
Outcome
risk of damagee0
Direction
increased potentiallye0
Qualifier
relaxation of the defence mechanismse0
Comparator
NCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relaxation of the defence mechanisms increased potentially the risk of damage due to the higher level of oxidative stress at EC under severe drought compared with NC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1682–1852 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 69 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.