Paper · 1998 · Plant Cell & Environment

Photosynthesis and conductance of spring‐wheat leaves: field response to continuous free‐air atmospheric CO2 enrichment

R. L. Garcia; S. P. Long; G. W. Wall; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
127
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Spring wheat was grown from emergence to grain maturity in two partial pressures of CO 2 ( p CO 2 ): ambient air of nominally 37 Pa and air enriched with CO 2 to 55 Pa using a free‐air CO 2 enrichment (FACE) apparatus. This experiment was the first of its kind to be conducted within a cereal field without the modifications or disturbance of microclimate and rooting environment that accompanied previous studies. It provided a unique opportunity to examine the hypothesis that continuous exposure of wheat to elevated p CO 2 will lead to acclimatory loss of photosynthetic capacity. The diurnal courses of photosynthesis and conductance for upper canopy leaves were followed throughout the development of the crop and compared to model‐predicted rates of photosynthesis. The seasonal average of midday photosynthesis rates was 28% greater in plants exposed to elevated p CO 2 than in contols and the seasonal average of the daily integrals of photosynthesis was 21% greater in elevated p CO 2 than in ambient air. The mean conductance at midday was reduced by 36%. The observed enhancement of photosynthesis in elevated p CO 2 agreed closely with that predicted from a mechanistic biochemical model that assumed no acclimation of photosynthetic capacity. Measured values fell below predicted only in the flag leaves in the mid afternoon before the onset of grain‐filling and over the whole diurnal course at the end of grain‐filling. The loss of enhancement at this final stage was attributed to the earlier senescence of flag leaves in elevated p CO 2 . In contrast to some controlled‐environment and field‐enclosure studies, this field‐scale study of wheat using free‐air CO 2 enrichment found little evidence of acclimatory loss of photosynthetic capacity with growth in elevated p CO 2 and a significant and substantial increase in leaf photosynthesis throughout the life of the crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 raised seasonal midday photosynthesis by 28%.

Taxon
spring‐wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
elevated p CO 2e0
Outcome
midday photosynthesis ratese0
Direction
greatere0
Value
28%e0
Comparator
contolse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seasonal average of midday photosynthesis rates was 28% greater in plants exposed to elevated p CO 2 than in contols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring‐wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 raised daily photosynthesis integrals by 21%.

Taxon
spring‐wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
elevated p CO 2e0
Outcome
daily integrals of photosynthesise0
Direction
greatere0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
ambient aire0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seasonal average of the daily integrals of photosynthesis was 21% greater in elevated p CO 2 than in ambient air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring‐wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Midday leaf conductance fell by 36% under elevated CO2.

Taxon
spring‐wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
air enriched with CO 2 to 55 Pae1
Outcome
conductance at middaye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean conductance at midday was reduced by 36%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1065 · show in text ↑
e1

“air enriched with CO 2 to 55 Pa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–167 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring‐wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The observed photosynthesis enhancement agreed closely with a model assuming no capacity acclimation.

Taxon
spring‐wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
enhancement of photosynthesise0
Direction
agreed closelye0
Comparator
mechanistic biochemical modele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The observed enhancement of photosynthesis in elevated p CO 2 agreed closely with that predicted from a mechanistic biochemical model that assumed no acclimation of photosynthetic capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring‐wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Measured photosynthesis fell below model prediction in flag leaves in midafternoon before grain filling.

Taxon
spring‐wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
flag leavese0
Outcome
Measured valuese0
Direction
fell belowe0
Comparator
predictede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Measured values fell below predicted only in the flag leaves in the mid afternoon before the onset of grain‐filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring‐wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Measured photosynthesis fell below model prediction across the day at the end of grain filling.

Taxon
spring‐wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Measured valuese1
Direction
fell belowe1
Qualifier
end of grain‐fillinge0
Comparator
predictede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“over the whole diurnal course at the end of grain‐filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1434 · show in text ↑
e1

“Measured values fell below predicted only in the flag leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring‐wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Loss of late-stage photosynthesis enhancement was attributed to earlier flag-leaf senescence under elevated CO2.

Taxon
spring‐wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
flag leavese0
Outcome
loss of enhancemente0
Qualifier
earlier senescencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The loss of enhancement at this final stage was attributed to the earlier senescence of flag leaves in elevated p CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1554 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring‐wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The field study found little evidence for photosynthetic capacity acclimation under elevated CO2.

Taxon
spring‐wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
acclimatory loss of photosynthetic capacitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“found little evidence of acclimatory loss of photosynthetic capacity with growth in elevated p CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1791 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring‐wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 69 positive, 28 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.