Paper · 1969 · Crop Science

Carbon Dioxide Uptake in Nitrogen‐Deficient Plants1

G. J. A. Ryle; J. D. Hesketh

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
71
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Carbon dioxide uptake at the leaf surface in air and in oxygen‐free air was examined in maize ( Zea mays L.), cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), and bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants exposed to an increasing deficiency of nitrogen. Carbon assimilation in these conditions was then related to the stomatal and apparent mesophyll resistances to CO 2 transfer. Lack of nitrogen decreased carbon assimilation in all three species. Assimilation was enhanced in oxygen‐free air in cotton and beans, but little affected in maize. The inhibition of assimilation in nitrogen‐deficient plants was accompanied by an apparent increase in mesophyll resistance to CO 2 transfer, but some increase in stomatal resistance was also measured. Enhancement of carbon assimilation in oxygen‐free air was negatively associated with the apparent mesophyll resistance to CO 2 transfer. Such apparent resistances in the mesophyll may be associated with differences in dark reactions, with a light or photosynthetically‐induced respiratory pathway, as well as with CO 2 diffusion.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen deficiency decreased carbon assimilation in maize, cotton, and bean.

Taxon
maize ( Zea mays L.), cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), and bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Gossypium hirsutumPhaseolus vulgarisZea mayse1
Treatment
Lack of nitrogene0
Outcome
carbon assimilatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lack of nitrogen decreased carbon assimilation in all three species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize ( Zea mays L.), cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), and bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxygen-free air enhanced carbon assimilation in cotton and beans.

Taxon
cotton and beanse0
Treatment
oxygen‐free aire0
Outcome
Assimilatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Assimilation was enhanced in oxygen‐free air in cotton and beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxygen-free air had little effect on carbon assimilation in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
oxygen‐free aire0
Outcome
Assimilatione0
Direction
little affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Assimilation was enhanced in oxygen‐free air in cotton and beans, but little affected in maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–523 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen-deficient plants had increased apparent mesophyll resistance to CO2 transfer.

Taxon
maize ( Zea mays L.), cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), and bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Gossypium hirsutumPhaseolus vulgarisZea mayse1
Treatment
nitrogen‐deficiente0
Outcome
mesophyll resistance to CO 2 transfere0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibition of assimilation in nitrogen‐deficient plants was accompanied by an apparent increase in mesophyll resistance to CO 2 transfer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–664 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize ( Zea mays L.), cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), and bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–183 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen-deficient plants had some increased stomatal resistance.

Taxon
maize ( Zea mays L.), cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), and bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Gossypium hirsutumPhaseolus vulgarisZea mayse2
Treatment
nitrogen‐deficiente1
Outcome
stomatal resistancee0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but some increase in stomatal resistance was also measured.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–725 · show in text ↑
e1

“nitrogen‐deficient plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–583 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize ( Zea mays L.), cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), and bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–183 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhancement of carbon assimilation in oxygen-free air was negatively associated with apparent mesophyll resistance.

Taxon
maize ( Zea mays L.), cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), and bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Gossypium hirsutumPhaseolus vulgarisZea mayse1
Treatment
oxygen‐free aire0
Outcome
carbon assimilatione0
Direction
negativelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhancement of carbon assimilation in oxygen‐free air was negatively associated with the apparent mesophyll resistance to CO 2 transfer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–862 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize ( Zea mays L.), cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), and bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–183 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 22 positive, 9 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

98 papers: 78 positive, 20 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.