Paper · 1994 · Agronomy Journal

Grain Yield, Kernel Weight, and Disease Responses of Winter Wheat Cultivars to Chloride Fertilization

Richard E. Engel; Joyce Eckhoff; Robert K. Berg

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
39
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Wheat yields in the Great Plains are frequently improved by potash (0‐0‐60 N‐P‐K) application on soils with seemingly abundant supplies of available K. The CI component in this fertilizer may cause many of the observed yield responses. Field research was undertaken to determine the effects of CI on grain yield, plant CI, kernel weight and growth rate, and foliar disease and/or disease‐like symptoms of winter wheat cultivars. Two sites with five CI levels (0, 22, 45, 90, and 135 kg ha −1 ) and two cultivars (Redwin, Cree) were used in 1988. Seven sites with two CI levels (0 and 45 kg ha −1 ) and six cultivars (Redwin, Cree, Weston, Manning, QT542, Neeley) were used from 1991 to 1992. Chloride increased yield by an average of 267 kg ha −1 (7%) at seven responsive sites. Size of yield response to CI was generally not affected by cultivar selection, but differed greatly with location. Whole‐plant CI analyses were useful in discriminating between yield responsive (≤ 3.0 g kg −1 ) and nonresponsive (>3.0 g kg −1 ) sites to CI fertilization. Improved CI nutrition enhanced plant development, increase immature kernel weights, and accelerated kernel growth during the grain‐fill period. Fertilizer CI increased mature kernel weights, up to 17%, at eight sites. Kernel weight was the most important yield component affected by CI. Physiological leaf spot in Redwin and Manning, flag leaf senescence in Weston and QT542, powdery mildew ( Erysiphe graminis DC. f. sp. tritici Em. Marchal), and leaf rust ( Puccinia recondita Roberge ex Desmaz. f. sp. tritici ) were suppressed by fertilizer CI. These phenomena may explain in part the yield responses to CI; however, yield response to CI occurred even without foliar disease and disease‐like suppression.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloride increased winter wheat yield by an average of 267 kg ha-1 (7%) at seven responsive sites.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Chloridee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
267 kg ha −1 (7%)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chloride increased yield by an average of 267 kg ha −1 (7%) at seven responsive sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The size of the yield response to chloride was generally not affected by cultivar selection.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
CIe0
Outcome
Size of yield responsee0
Qualifier
generally not affected by cultivar selectione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Size of yield response to CI was generally not affected by cultivar selection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–865 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-plant chloride analyses were useful in discriminating yield responsive (3.0 g kg-1 or less) from nonresponsive (above 3.0 g kg-1) sites.

Outcome
discriminating between yield responsivee0
Value
≤ 3.0 g kg −1e0
Comparator
nonresponsivee0

Verbatim

e0

“Whole‐plant CI analyses were useful in discriminating between yield responsive (≤ 3.0 g kg −1 ) and nonresponsive (>3.0 g kg −1 ) sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved chloride nutrition enhanced plant development, increased immature kernel weights and accelerated kernel growth during grain fill.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Improved CI nutritione0
Outcome
plant development, increase immature kernel weights, and accelerated kernel growthe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Improved CI nutrition enhanced plant development, increase immature kernel weights, and accelerated kernel growth during the grain‐fill period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer chloride increased mature kernel weights by up to 17% at eight sites.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Fertilizer CIe0
Outcome
mature kernel weightse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
up to 17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fertilizer CI increased mature kernel weights, up to 17%, at eight sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1276 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel weight was the most important yield component affected by chloride.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Kernel weighte0
Direction
most importante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Kernel weight was the most important yield component affected by CI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physiological leaf spot in Redwin and Manning was suppressed by fertilizer chloride.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Redwin and Manninge0
Treatment
fertilizer CIe1
Outcome
Physiological leaf spote0
Direction
suppressede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Physiological leaf spot in Redwin and Manning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1392 · show in text ↑
e1

“suppressed by fertilizer CI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf senescence in Weston and QT542 was suppressed by fertilizer chloride.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Weston and QT542e0
Treatment
fertilizer CIe1
Outcome
flag leaf senescencee0
Direction
suppressede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“flag leaf senescence in Weston and QT542”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1434 · show in text ↑
e1

“suppressed by fertilizer CI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Powdery mildew (Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici) was suppressed by fertilizer chloride.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fertilizer CIe1
Interactor
Erysiphe graminis DC. f. sp. tritici Em. MarchalBlumeria graminis f. sp. triticie0pathogen
Outcome
powdery mildewe0
Direction
suppressede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici
Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Clemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“powdery mildew ( Erysiphe graminis DC. f. sp. tritici Em. Marchal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1502 · show in text ↑
e1

“suppressed by fertilizer CI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf rust (Puccinia recondita f. sp. tritici) was suppressed by fertilizer chloride.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fertilizer CIe1
Interactor
Puccinia recondita Roberge ex Desmaz. f. sp. triticiPuccinia reconditae0pathogen
Outcome
leaf ruste0
Direction
suppressede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia recondita
Puccinia recondita · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorybjoerns · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaf rust ( Puccinia recondita Roberge ex Desmaz. f. sp. tritici )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1574 · show in text ↑
e1

“suppressed by fertilizer CI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1607 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Suppression of foliar disease and disease-like symptoms may explain in part the yield responses to chloride.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
CIe0
Outcome
yield responsese0
Qualifier
may explain in parte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“These phenomena may explain in part the yield responses to CI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1670 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield response to chloride occurred even without foliar disease and disease-like suppression.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
yield response to CIe0
Qualifier
even without foliar disease and disease‐like suppressione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“yield response to CI occurred even without foliar disease and disease‐like suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1681–1767 · show in text ↑

chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 37 positive, 9 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

fertilization · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 72 positive, 35 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

fertilization · Puccinia recondita · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.