Abstract
Abstract Root dry weight and leaf number were not affected by thigmic stress or chlormequat chloride. Shoot dry weight, shoot:root dry weight ratio, shoot height, leaf area, and root surface area were decreased by both thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride. However, root length was decreased and root radius increased only by chlormequat chloride. Total element uptake was decreased by both thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride. In the shoot and root, N was not affected, P was increased in the shoots, K decreased in the shoots but increased in the roots, and Mg decreased in the roots as a result of thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride. Whereas, Ca was decreased in the roots and Mg increased in the shoots by chlormequat chloride. The uptake of N, P, Ca, or Mg was not affected by thigmic stress or chlormequat chloride, however, K uptake per root surface area decreased. Thigmic stress decreased K in both the upper and lower stem but did not affect leaf concentration of K. However, chlormequat chloride decreased K in both the stem and leaves. Thigmic stress because of the role of K in cell elongation. Chemical name used: (2‐chloroethyl)trimethyl‐ammonium chloride (chlormequat chloride).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 19
Claim · model-written summary
Root dry weight and leaf number were not affected by thigmic stress or chlormequat chloride.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- thigmic stress or chlormequat chloridee0
- Outcome
- Root dry weight and leaf numbere0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“Root dry weight and leaf number were not affected by thigmic stress or chlormequat chloride”
Claim · model-written summary
Thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride both decreased shoot dry weight, shoot:root ratio and shoot height in tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- both thigmic stress and chlormequat chloridee0
- Outcome
- Shoot dry weight, shoot:root dry weight ratio, shoot heighte0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“Shoot dry weight, shoot:root dry weight ratio, shoot height, leaf area, and root surface area were decreased by both thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride”
Claim · model-written summary
Thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride both decreased leaf area and root surface area in tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- both thigmic stress and chlormequat chloridee0
- Outcome
- leaf area, and root surface areae0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“Shoot dry weight, shoot:root dry weight ratio, shoot height, leaf area, and root surface area were decreased by both thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlormequat chloride decreased root length in tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- chlormequat chloridee0
- Outcome
- root lengthe0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“However, root length was decreased and root radius increased only by chlormequat chloride”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlormequat chloride increased root radius in tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- chlormequat chloridee0
- Outcome
- root radiuse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“However, root length was decreased and root radius increased only by chlormequat chloride”
Claim · model-written summary
Thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride both decreased total element uptake in tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- both thigmic stress and chlormequat chloridee0
- Outcome
- Total element uptakee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“Total element uptake was decreased by both thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride”
Claim · model-written summary
Thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride did not affect N in the shoot and root of tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Organ / stage
- shoot and roote0
- Treatment
- thigmic stress and chlormequat chloridee1
- Outcome
- Ne0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“In the shoot and root, N was not affected”
e1“as a result of thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride”
Claim · model-written summary
Thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride increased P in tomato shoots.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Organ / stage
- shootse0
- Treatment
- thigmic stress and chlormequat chloridee1
- Outcome
- Pe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“P was increased in the shoots”
e1“as a result of thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride”
Claim · model-written summary
Thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride decreased K in tomato shoots.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Organ / stage
- shootse0
- Treatment
- thigmic stress and chlormequat chloridee1
- Outcome
- Ke0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“K decreased in the shoots but increased in the roots”
e1“as a result of thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride”
Claim · model-written summary
Thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride increased K in tomato roots.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Treatment
- thigmic stress and chlormequat chloridee1
- Outcome
- Ke0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“K decreased in the shoots but increased in the roots”
e1“as a result of thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride”
Claim · model-written summary
Thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride decreased Mg in tomato roots.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Treatment
- thigmic stress and chlormequat chloridee1
- Outcome
- Mge0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“Mg decreased in the roots”
e1“as a result of thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlormequat chloride decreased Ca in tomato roots.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Treatment
- chlormequat chloridee0
- Outcome
- Cae0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“Ca was decreased in the roots and Mg increased in the shoots by chlormequat chloride”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlormequat chloride increased Mg in tomato shoots.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Organ / stage
- shootse0
- Treatment
- chlormequat chloridee0
- Outcome
- Mge0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“Ca was decreased in the roots and Mg increased in the shoots by chlormequat chloride”
Claim · model-written summary
Thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride did not affect the uptake of N, P and Ca in tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- thigmic stress or chlormequat chloridee0
- Outcome
- uptake of N, P, Cae0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“The uptake of N, P, Ca, or Mg was not affected by thigmic stress or chlormequat chloride, however, K uptake per root surface area decreased”
Claim · model-written summary
Thigmic stress and chlormequat chloride did not affect the uptake of Mg in tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- thigmic stress or chlormequat chloridee0
- Outcome
- Mge0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“The uptake of N, P, Ca, or Mg was not affected by thigmic stress or chlormequat chloride, however, K uptake per root surface area decreased”
Claim · model-written summary
Thigmic stress or chlormequat chloride decreased K uptake per root surface area in tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- thigmic stress or chlormequat chloridee0
- Outcome
- K uptake per root surface areae0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“The uptake of N, P, Ca, or Mg was not affected by thigmic stress or chlormequat chloride, however, K uptake per root surface area decreased”
Claim · model-written summary
Thigmic stress decreased K in the upper and lower stem of tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Organ / stage
- upper and lower steme0
- Treatment
- Thigmic stresse0
- Outcome
- Ke0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“Thigmic stress decreased K in both the upper and lower stem but did not affect leaf concentration of K”
Claim · model-written summary
Thigmic stress did not affect K concentration in tomato leaves.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Thigmic stresse0
- Outcome
- leaf concentration of Ke0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“Thigmic stress decreased K in both the upper and lower stem but did not affect leaf concentration of K”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlormequat chloride decreased K in tomato stems and leaves.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Organ / stage
- stem and leavese0
- Treatment
- chlormequat chloridee0
- Outcome
- Ke0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato morphology”
e0“However, chlormequat chloride decreased K in both the stem and leaves”
The same questions in other papers
chlormequat chloride · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
chloride · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
chloride · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
chlormequat chloride · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.