Paper · 2011 · The Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management

METAL ELEMENT UPTAKE IN VEGETABLES AND WHEAT AFTER BIOSOLIDS APPLICATION

W. Cotching; J. Coad

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Metal element concentrations were measured in the edible portions of silverbeet, potato and wheat grown in a glasshouse experiment after application of lime amended biosolids (LAB) and digester sludge. Biosolids were mixed into soil for the replicated pot experiment at rates of 1, 2 and 5 times theN requirement of each crop grown. No significant effect was found of different biosolids application rates on uptake of As, Hg or Se. The concentration of As was less than the maximum permitted limit (ML) of 1mg/kg in all crops grown. The ML for lead (0.1 mg/kg in vegetables) was only exceeded at the greatest LAB treatment rate in silverbeet. No significant differences in the concentration of Cd were found at different application rates of LAB or digester sludge in potato, wheat fodder or wheat grain. Silverbeet was found to contain much higher concentrations than potato or wheat fodder of Al, Fe and Zn and higher concentrations of Cu, Ni, Cd, and Co and the concentration of Cd in silverbeetexceeded the ML (0.1 mg/kg) in most treatments including the control, which may be due to species specific bioaccumulation. Correlation of soil pH and EC to rate and type of biosolids applied are likely explanations for different metal element concentrations due to contrasting bio-availability resulting from pH or EC effects. An increased plant uptake of metal elements associated with the greatest biosolids application rates applied in this glasshouse experiment are unlikely under realistic field conditions in Tasmania.Keywords: Heavy metals, potato, silverbeet, wheat

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biosolids application rate did not significantly alter As, Hg or Se uptake in the crops.

Taxon
silverbeet, potato and wheate1
Treatment
different biosolids application ratese0
Outcome
uptake of As, Hg or See0
Direction
No significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“No significant effect was found of different biosolids application rates on uptake of As, Hg or Se.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–432 · show in text ↑
e1

“silverbeet, potato and wheat grown in a glasshouse experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arsenic concentration was below its permitted limit in all crops.

Taxon
silverbeet, potato and wheate1
Outcome
concentration of Ase0
Direction
less thane0
Value
1mg/kge0
Comparator
maximum permitted limit (ML)e0

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of As was less than the maximum permitted limit (ML) of 1mg/kg in all crops grown.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–533 · show in text ↑
e1

“silverbeet, potato and wheat grown in a glasshouse experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lead exceeded its permitted limit only at the greatest lime amended biosolids rate in silverbeet.

Taxon
silverbeete0
Treatment
greatest LAB treatment ratee0
Outcome
leade0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
0.1 mg/kge0

Verbatim

e0

“The ML for lead (0.1 mg/kg in vegetables) was only exceeded at the greatest LAB treatment rate in silverbeet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium concentration did not differ significantly with biosolids rate in potato, wheat fodder or wheat grain.

Taxon
potato, wheat fodder or wheat graine0
Treatment
different application rates of LAB or digester sludgee0
Outcome
concentration of Cde0
Direction
No significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences in the concentration of Cd were found at different application rates of LAB or digester sludge in potato, wheat fodder or wheat grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–805 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silverbeet had much higher Al, Fe and Zn concentrations than potato or wheat fodder.

Taxon
Silverbeete0
Outcome
concentrations than potato or wheat fodder of Al, Fe and Zne0
Direction
much highere0
Comparator
potato or wheat foddere0

Verbatim

e0

“Silverbeet was found to contain much higher concentrations than potato or wheat fodder of Al, Fe and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–909 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silverbeet had higher Cu, Ni and Cd concentrations than potato or wheat fodder.

Taxon
silverbeett0
Outcome
concentrations of Cu, Ni, Cde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
potato or wheat foddere1

Verbatim

e0

“higher concentrations of Cu, Ni, Cd, and Co”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“silverbeet, potato and wheat grown in a glasshouse experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Silverbeet was found to contain much higher concentrations than potato or wheat fodder of Al, Fe and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–909 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silverbeet had higher Co concentration than potato or wheat fodder.

Taxon
silverbeett0
Outcome
Coe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
potato or wheat foddere1

Verbatim

e0

“higher concentrations of Cu, Ni, Cd, and Co”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“silverbeet, potato and wheat grown in a glasshouse experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Silverbeet was found to contain much higher concentrations than potato or wheat fodder of Al, Fe and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–909 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium in silverbeet exceeded its limit in most treatments including control.

Taxon
silverbeett0
Outcome
concentration of Cde0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
0.1 mg/kge0
Qualifier
most treatments including the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“the concentration of Cd in silverbeetexceeded the ML (0.1 mg/kg) in most treatments including the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“silverbeet, potato and wheat grown in a glasshouse experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–130 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider increased metal uptake at the greatest biosolids rates unlikely under realistic Tasmanian field conditions.

Taxon
silverbeet, potato and wheatt0
Treatment
greatest biosolids application ratese0
Outcome
plant uptake of metal elementse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
unlikely under realistic field conditionse0
Setting
Tasmaniae0

Verbatim

e0

“An increased plant uptake of metal elements associated with the greatest biosolids application rates applied in this glasshouse experiment are unlikely under realistic field conditions in Tasmania.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1524 · show in text ↑
t0

“silverbeet, potato and wheat grown in a glasshouse experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–130 · show in text ↑

lime · molecular: metabolites · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

organic · molecular: metabolites · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

lime · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

organic · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.