Abstract
The effects of storage duration and apple treatment by 1-MCP on yield, turbidity, cloud stability, composition of phenolics and antioxidant activity were studied to evaluate the potential applicability of long-term stored apples in cloudy juice production. Main emphasis was given to the high molecular weight of procyanidins especially nonextractable polyphenols bonded to insoluble fiber fractions. Juices were obtained from ‘Idared’, ‘Shampion’ and ‘Topaz’ apples cultivars after harvest (not stored), and after 2, 4, and 6 months of storage at 2 °C under normal atmosphere (NA). Juice yield in juices obtained from non-stored apples was between 69 and 76 g/100 g and successively during storage time decreased. The turbidity of obtained cloudy juices was from 540 to 2860 NTU (Nephelometric Turbidity Units). Total phenolic compounds content in apple juices produced from non-stored fruits was 794.5 mg/L in ‘Idared’, 882.2 mg/L in ‘Shampion’ and 683.0 mg/L in ‘Topaz’. Total polyphenols in 'Idared' and 'Shampion' decreased after 6 months of storage. In ‘Topaz’ total polyphenolic content increased after storage. The content of procyanidins in insoluble fraction of juices obtained from non-stored apples was lower in comparison to juices after storage and was higher in juices obtained from apples treated with 1-MCP.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Juice yield from non-stored apples was between 69 and 76 g/100 g.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae0 - Outcome
- Juice yielde0
- Value
- between 69 and 76 g/100 ge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Juice yield in juices obtained from non-stored apples was between 69 and 76 g/100 g and successively during storage time decreased”
Claim · model-written summary
Juice yield decreased successively with storage time of the apples.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae0 - Treatment
- storage timee0
- Outcome
- Juice yielde0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- non-stored applese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Juice yield in juices obtained from non-stored apples was between 69 and 76 g/100 g and successively during storage time decreased”
Claim · model-written summary
The turbidity of the obtained cloudy apple juices was from 540 to 2860 NTU.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Outcome
- turbiditye0
- Value
- from 540 to 2860 NTUe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“apple”
e0“The turbidity of obtained cloudy juices was from 540 to 2860 NTU”
Claim · model-written summary
Total phenolic compounds content in juice from non-stored Idared apples was 794.5 mg/L.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- Idarede0
- Outcome
- Total phenolic compounds contente0
- Value
- 794.5 mg/Le0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Total phenolic compounds content in apple juices produced from non-stored fruits was 794.5 mg/L in ‘Idared’, 882.2 mg/L in ‘Shampion’ and 683.0 mg/L in ‘Topaz’”
Claim · model-written summary
Total phenolic compounds content in juice from non-stored Shampion apples was 882.2 mg/L.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- Shampione0
- Outcome
- Total phenolic compounds contente0
- Value
- 882.2 mg/Le0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Total phenolic compounds content in apple juices produced from non-stored fruits was 794.5 mg/L in ‘Idared’, 882.2 mg/L in ‘Shampion’ and 683.0 mg/L in ‘Topaz’”
Claim · model-written summary
Total phenolic compounds content in juice from non-stored Topaz apples was 683.0 mg/L.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- Topaze0
- Outcome
- Total phenolic compounds contente0
- Value
- 683.0 mg/Le0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Total phenolic compounds content in apple juices produced from non-stored fruits was 794.5 mg/L in ‘Idared’, 882.2 mg/L in ‘Shampion’ and 683.0 mg/L in ‘Topaz’”
Claim · model-written summary
Total polyphenols in 'Idared' juice decreased after 6 months of storage.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Material
- Idarede0
- Treatment
- 6 months of storagee0
- Outcome
- Total polyphenolse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“apple”
e0“Total polyphenols in 'Idared' and 'Shampion' decreased after 6 months of storage”
Claim · model-written summary
Total polyphenols in 'Shampion' juice decreased after 6 months of storage.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Material
- Shampione0
- Treatment
- 6 months of storagee0
- Outcome
- Total polyphenolse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“apple”
e0“Total polyphenols in 'Idared' and 'Shampion' decreased after 6 months of storage”
Claim · model-written summary
Total polyphenolic content in Topaz juice increased after storage.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Material
- Topaze0
- Treatment
- storagee0
- Outcome
- total polyphenolic contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“apple”
e0“In ‘Topaz’ total polyphenolic content increased after storage”
Claim · model-written summary
Procyanidin content in the insoluble fraction of juice from non-stored apples was lower than in juice from stored apples.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae0 - Treatment
- storagee0
- Outcome
- content of procyanidins in insoluble fractione0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- non-stored applese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The content of procyanidins in insoluble fraction of juices obtained from non-stored apples was lower in comparison to juices after storage and was higher in juices obtained from apples treated with 1-MCP”
Claim · model-written summary
Procyanidin content in the insoluble fraction of juice was higher in juice from apples treated with 1-MCP.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae0 - Treatment
- 1-MCPe0
- Outcome
- content of procyanidins in insoluble fractione0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The content of procyanidins in insoluble fraction of juices obtained from non-stored apples was lower in comparison to juices after storage and was higher in juices obtained from apples treated with 1-MCP”
The same questions in other papers
1-methylcyclopropene · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →storage · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →storage · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →storage · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.