Paper · 2014 · Journal of Oleo Science

The Plant Growth-promoting Fungus Penicillium spp. GP15-1 Enhances Growth and Confers Protection against Damping-off and Anthracnose in the Cucumber

Md. Motaher Hossain; Farjana Sultana; Mitsuo Miyazawa; et al.

9
claims
29
verbatim quotes
76
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting fungi (PGPF) have the potential to confer several benefits to plants in terms of growth and protection against pests and pathogens. In the present study, we tested whether a PGPF isolate, Penicillium spp. GP15-1 (derived from zoysiagrass rhizospheres), stimulates growth and disease resistance in the cucumber plant. The use of the barley grain inoculum GP15-1 significantly enhanced root and shoot growth and biomass of cucumber plants. A root colonization study revealed that GP15-1 was a very rapid and efficient root colonizer and was isolated in significantly higher frequencies from the upper root parts than from the middle and lower root parts during the first 14 d of seedling growth. Inoculating the cucumber seedlings with GP15-1 significantly reduced the damping-off disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani, and the disease suppression effects of GP15-1 were considerably influenced by the inoculum potential of both GP15-1 and the pathogen. Treatment with the barley grain inoculum or a cell-free filtrate of GP15-1 increased systemic resistance against leaf infection by the anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum orbiculare, resulting in a significant decrease in lesion number and size. Molecular and phylogenetic analyses of internal transcribed spacer sequences of the genomic DNA of GP15-1 revealed that the fungal isolate is a strain of either Penicillium neoechinulatum or Penicillium viridicatum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GP15-1 barley grain inoculum significantly enhanced cucumber root and shoot growth and biomass.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
barley grain inoculum GP15-1e0
Interactor
Penicillium spp. GP15-1e1symbiont
Outcome
root and shoot growth and biomasse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“The use of the barley grain inoculum GP15-1 significantly enhanced root and shoot growth and biomass of cucumber plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“Penicillium spp. GP15-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GP15-1 rapidly and efficiently colonized cucumber roots.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
Penicillium spp. GP15-1e1symbiont
Outcome
root colonizere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“GP15-1 was a very rapid and efficient root colonizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“Penicillium spp. GP15-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GP15-1 isolation frequency was significantly higher in upper than middle and lower root parts during the first 14 days.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
upper root partse0
Interactor
Penicillium spp. GP15-1e1symbiont
Outcome
frequenciese0
Direction
highere0
Value
14 de0
Comparator
middle and lower root partse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“was isolated in significantly higher frequencies from the upper root parts than from the middle and lower root parts during the first 14 d of seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–715 · show in text ↑
e1

“Penicillium spp. GP15-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GP15-1 inoculation significantly reduced cucumber damping-off caused by Rhizoctonia solani.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Inoculating the cucumber seedlings with GP15-1e0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
Penicillium spp. GP15-1e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
damping-off diseasee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculating the cucumber seedlings with GP15-1 significantly reduced the damping-off disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–838 · show in text ↑
e1

“Penicillium spp. GP15-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–234 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Damping-off suppression varied with inoculum potential of GP15-1 and the pathogen.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
inoculum potentiale0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Second interactor
Penicillium spp. GP15-1e2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease suppression effectse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“the disease suppression effects of GP15-1 were considerably influenced by the inoculum potential of both GP15-1 and the pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–972 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–838 · show in text ↑
e2

“Penicillium spp. GP15-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GP15-1 barley grain inoculum increased systemic resistance against Colletotrichum leaf infection.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
barley grain inoculume0
Interactor
Colletotrichum orbiculareColletotrichum orbicularee0pathogen
Second interactor
Penicillium spp. GP15-1e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
systemic resistancee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum orbiculare
Colletotrichum orbiculare · InteractorDavid B. Langston, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treatment with the barley grain inoculum or a cell-free filtrate of GP15-1 increased systemic resistance against leaf infection by the anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum orbiculare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1155 · show in text ↑
e1

“Penicillium spp. GP15-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A cell-free GP15-1 filtrate increased systemic resistance against Colletotrichum leaf infection.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
cell-free filtrate of GP15-1e0
Interactor
Colletotrichum orbiculareColletotrichum orbicularee0pathogen
Second interactor
Penicillium spp. GP15-1e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
systemic resistancee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum orbiculare
Colletotrichum orbiculare · InteractorDavid B. Langston, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treatment with the barley grain inoculum or a cell-free filtrate of GP15-1 increased systemic resistance against leaf infection by the anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum orbiculare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1155 · show in text ↑
e1

“Penicillium spp. GP15-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GP15-1 treatment significantly decreased anthracnose lesion number and size.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
GP15-1e2
Interactor
Colletotrichum orbiculareColletotrichum orbicularee1pathogen
Second interactor
Penicillium spp. GP15-1e2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
lesion number and sizee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum orbiculare
Colletotrichum orbiculare · InteractorDavid B. Langston, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“resulting in a significant decrease in lesion number and size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1218 · show in text ↑
e1

“Colletotrichum orbiculare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1155 · show in text ↑
e2

“Penicillium spp. GP15-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequence analysis identified GP15-1 as either Penicillium neoechinulatum or Penicillium viridicatum.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
Penicillium spp. GP15-1e1symbiont
Outcome
a strain of either Penicillium neoechinulatum or Penicillium viridicatume0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“the fungal isolate is a strain of either Penicillium neoechinulatum or Penicillium viridicatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1434 · show in text ↑
e1

“Penicillium spp. GP15-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–234 · show in text ↑

Hordeum vulgare · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 109 positive, 12 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

pathogen product · Colletotrichum orbiculare · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · Colletotrichum orbiculare · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · Rhizoctonia solani · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.