Paper · 2003 · International Journal of Pest Management

Managing apple scab (Venturia inaequalis) and powdery mildew (Podosphaera leucotricha) using Adem™

AM Berrie; X-M Xu

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
48
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Current control of scab and mildew of apple in the UK requires the routine application of fungicides at 7 - 14-day intervals to achieve the blemish-free fruit required by the market. Such practices are generally effective, but with increased public concern about pesticides and rising costs to the grower, they are now less acceptable. The use of disease-warning systems offers scope for optimizing fungicide use by better timing of sprays. Adem™ is a PC-based system that warns of the risk of scab, mildew, Nectria fruit rot and canker and fireblight. In a 'key stage' strategy, warnings by Adem™ for scab and mildew integrated with practical pest and disease control resulted in similar or better control than a routine programme, with the additional benefit of reduced fungicide inputs and costs even in seasons exceptionally favourable for these diseases. Maximum savings in fungicide use were made by applying sprays curatively in response to scab warnings. However, this approach resulted in increased disease incidence to the crop and scab infection of fruit even in seasons unfavourable for scab attack. Keywords: Adem™Apple ScabApple Powdery MildewDisease Forecasting

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warning-guided key-stage spraying controlled scab as well as or better than routine spraying.

Treatment
warnings by Adem™ for scab and mildewe0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
similar or bettere0
Comparator
routine programmee0

Not reportedTaxonInteractor

Verbatim

e0

“warnings by Adem™ for scab and mildew integrated with practical pest and disease control resulted in similar or better control than a routine programme”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The warning strategy reduced fungicide inputs and costs.

Treatment
Adem™e1
Outcome
fungicide inputs and costse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the additional benefit of reduced fungicide inputs and costs even in seasons exceptionally favourable for these diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–14 · show in text ↑
e1

“warnings by Adem™ for scab and mildew integrated with practical pest and disease control resulted in similar or better control than a routine programme”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Curative sprays after scab warnings saved the most fungicide.

Treatment
applying sprays curatively in response to scab warningse0
Interactor
Venturia inaequalisVenturia inaequalist0pathogen
Outcome
fungicide usee0
Direction
Maximum savingse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum savings in fungicide use were made by applying sprays curatively in response to scab warnings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple scab (Venturia inaequalis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Curative spraying increased disease incidence.

Treatment
this approache0
Outcome
disease incidence to the crope0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this approach resulted in increased disease incidence to the crop and scab infection of fruit even in seasons unfavourable for scab attack”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Curative spraying increased scab infection of fruit.

Treatment
this approache0
Interactor
Venturia inaequalisVenturia inaequalist0pathogen
Outcome
scab infection of fruite0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this approach resulted in increased disease incidence to the crop and scab infection of fruit even in seasons unfavourable for scab attack”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple scab (Venturia inaequalis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–41 · show in text ↑

application · Venturia inaequalis · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.