Abstract
Apple plants, cultivar Novole, were either uninoculated (control) or inoculated with one of the following mycorrhizal fungi: Glomus macrocarpum Tul. and Tul., Glomus intraradices Schenk and Smith, Glomus fasciculatum (Thaxter sensu Gerd.) Gerd. and Trappe, Glomus mosseae (Nicol. and Gerd.) Ger. and Trappe, or Glomus epigaeum Daniels and Trappe. Groups of plants were harvested of three successive intervals. Glomus intraradices and G. epigaeum caused most rapid and highest levels of root infection, and increased P uptake compared with plants which were inoculated with the other fungi, or were uninoculated. Plants inoculated with G. intraradices and G. epigaeum had greatest dry weights.Key words: Glomus macrocarpum, Glomus intraradices, Glomus fasciculatum, Glomus mosseae, Glomus epigaeum, phosphorus
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Glomus intraradices and G. epigaeum gave the most rapid and highest root infection in apple compared with the other mycorrhizal fungi or uninoculated plants.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- Novolee0
- Organ / stage
- roote1
- Treatment
- inoculated with one of the following mycorrhizal fungie0
- Interactor
- Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese1symbiont
- Second interactor
- G. epigaeumDiversispora epigaeae1symbiont
- Outcome
- root infectione1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Comparator
- plants which were inoculated with the other fungi, or were uninoculatede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Apple plants, cultivar Novole, were either uninoculated (control) or inoculated with one of the following mycorrhizal fungi”
e1“Glomus intraradices and G. epigaeum caused most rapid and highest levels of root infection, and increased P uptake compared with plants which were inoculated with the other fungi, or were uninoculated”
Claim · model-written summary
Glomus intraradices and G. epigaeum increased P uptake in apple compared with the other mycorrhizal fungi or uninoculated plants.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticae0
- Material
- Novolee0
- Treatment
- inoculated with one of the following mycorrhizal fungie0
- Interactor
- Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese1symbiont
- Second interactor
- G. epigaeumDiversispora epigaeae1symbiont
- Outcome
- P uptakee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- plants which were inoculated with the other fungi, or were uninoculatede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Apple plants, cultivar Novole, were either uninoculated (control) or inoculated with one of the following mycorrhizal fungi”
e1“Glomus intraradices and G. epigaeum caused most rapid and highest levels of root infection, and increased P uptake compared with plants which were inoculated with the other fungi, or were uninoculated”
Claim · model-written summary
Plants inoculated with Glomus intraradices and G. epigaeum had the greatest dry weights.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticae0
- Treatment
- inoculated with G. intraradices and G. epigaeume2
- Interactor
- G. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese2symbiont
- Second interactor
- G. epigaeumDiversispora epigaeae2symbiont
- Outcome
- dry weightse2
- Direction
- greateste2
- Comparator
- uninoculated (control)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Apple plants, cultivar Novole, were either uninoculated (control) or inoculated with one of the following mycorrhizal fungi”
e2“Plants inoculated with G. intraradices and G. epigaeum had greatest dry weights”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizophagus intraradices · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
inoculation · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
38 papers more in this group
See all 42 papers →inoculation · Rhizophagus intraradices · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
mycorrhiza · Rhizophagus intraradices · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.