Paper · 2008 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Preparation and Optimization of Amino Acid Chelated Micronutrient Fertilizer by Hydrolyzation of Chicken Waste Feathers and the Effects on Growth of Rice

Mu Jie; Waseem Raza; Yuan Chun Xu; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
52
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT For the preparation of amino acid chelated fertilizer, chicken feathers were hydrolyzed with sulfuric acid (H2SO4; 6M) and potassium hydroxide (KOH; 6M) separately in the presence of different catalysts. Under acidic conditions, the catalyst zinc sulfate, gave minimum ammonium but a maximum conversion rate of organic nitrogen (N) into amino acids (19% higher than control). Under alkaline conditions, sodium sulfide showed maximum amino acid-N and conversion rate (37% higher than control). The catalyst doses showed a continuous increase in the conversion rate and were highest at 12%. The ratio of 1:3 feathers: hydrolytic agent showed maximum conversion rate. Hydrolytic time had a nonsignificant effect under acidic conditions, but under alkaline conditions a hydrolytic time of 14 h gave the maximum conversion rate. The chelation experiment results showed that the ratios (2:1, 2.5:1, and 3:1) showed almost equal chelation rates, except the 1:1 ratio of hydrolysis product to salt. Iron (Fe), copper (Cu), and manganese (Mn) showed maximum chelation rates under acidic pH, while zinc (Zn) showed maximum chelation rate at an alkaline pH. Temperature and chelation time had a nonsignificant effect on chelation rate. Comparative study results of amino acid chelated Zn and Fe fertilizers, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) chelated Zn and Fe fertilizers, and zinc sulfate (ZnSO4) and iron sulfate (FeSO4) fertilizer foliar application to upland rice showed that a 1/100 dilution of amino acid chelated Zn and Fe fertilizers increased growth parameters from 22–73%, while EDTA chelated Zn and Fe fertilizers caused an increase of 15–63%, and ZnSO4 and FeSO4 increased growth parameters from 11–35% over the control. After fertilizer application, increase in chlorophyll contents was 11–17%, 3–6%, and 8–12%, respectively, over control. Therefore, amino acid chelated micronutrient fertilizer is used in small amounts, has a low cost, and high rates of return.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid chelated Zn and Fe fertilizer at 1/100 dilution increased rice growth parameters by 22–73% over control.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae1
Treatment
1/100 dilution of amino acid chelated Zn and Fe fertilizerse0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22–73%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 1/100 dilution of amino acid chelated Zn and Fe fertilizers increased growth parameters from 22–73%, while EDTA chelated Zn and Fe fertilizers caused an increase of 15–63%, and ZnSO4 and FeSO4 increased growth parameters from 11–35% over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1735 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar application to upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO4 and FeSO4 fertilizer increased rice growth parameters by 11–35% over control.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae1
Treatment
ZnSO4 and FeSO4e0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11–35%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZnSO4 and FeSO4 increased growth parameters from 11–35% over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1735 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar application to upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid chelated fertilizer increased rice chlorophyll content by 11–17% over control.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae2
Treatment
amino acid chelated Zn and Fe fertilizerse1
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11–17%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After fertilizer application, increase in chlorophyll contents was 11–17%, 3–6%, and 8–12%, respectively, over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1855 · show in text ↑
e1

“1/100 dilution of amino acid chelated Zn and Fe fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1545 · show in text ↑
e2

“upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EDTA chelated fertilizer increased rice chlorophyll content by 3–6% over control.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae2
Treatment
EDTA chelated Zn and Fe fertilizerse1
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3–6%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After fertilizer application, increase in chlorophyll contents was 11–17%, 3–6%, and 8–12%, respectively, over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1855 · show in text ↑
e1

“EDTA chelated Zn and Fe fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1628 · show in text ↑
e2

“upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfate fertilizers increased rice chlorophyll content by 8–12% over control.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae2
Treatment
zinc sulfate (ZnSO4) and iron sulfate (FeSO4) fertilizere1
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
8–12%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After fertilizer application, increase in chlorophyll contents was 11–17%, 3–6%, and 8–12%, respectively, over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1855 · show in text ↑
e1

“zinc sulfate (ZnSO4) and iron sulfate (FeSO4) fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1437 · show in text ↑
e2

“upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1471 · show in text ↑

iron atom · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

iron atom · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

62 papers: 36 positive, 26 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

132 papers: 118 positive, 14 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

128 papers more in this group

See all 132 papers →

amino acid · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

sulfate · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc atom · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 21 positive, 3 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

zinc sulfate · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 48 positive, 2 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

amino acid · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.