Paper · 2013 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Effects of Nitrogen and Sulfur Fertilization on Free Amino Acids, Sugars, and Acrylamide-Forming Potential in Potato

Nira Muttucumaru; Stephen J. Powers; J. Stephen Elmore; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
91
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · publisher-specific-oa

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) fertilizer is used routinely in potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivation to maximize yield. However, it also affects sugar and free amino acid concentrations in potato tubers, and this has potential implications for food quality and safety because free amino acids and reducing sugars participate in the Maillard reaction during high-temperature cooking and processing. This results in the formation of color, aroma, and flavor compounds, but also some undesirable contaminants, including acrylamide, which forms when the amino acid that participates in the final stages of the reaction is asparagine. Another mineral, sulfur (S), also has profound effects on tuber composition. In this study, 13 varieties of potato were grown in a field trial in 2010 and treated with different combinations of N and S. Potatoes were analyzed immediately after harvest to show the effect of N and S fertilization on concentrations of free asparagine, other free amino acids, sugars, and acrylamide-forming potential. The study showed that N application can affect acrylamide-forming potential in potatoes but that the effect is type- (French fry, chipping, and boiling) and variety-dependent, with most varieties showing an increase in acrylamide formation in response to increased N but two showing a decrease. S application reduced glucose concentrations and mitigated the effect of high N application on the acrylamide-forming potential of some of the French fry-type potatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed publisher-specific-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher N increased acrylamide formation in most potato varieties.

Material
most varietiese0
Treatment
increased Ne0
Outcome
acrylamide formatione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most varieties showing an increase in acrylamide formation in response to increased N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher N decreased acrylamide formation in two potato varieties.

Material
twoe0
Treatment
Nt0
Outcome
Acrylamide-Forming Potentialt0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but two showing a decrease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen and Sulfur Fertilization on Free Amino Acids, Sugars, and Acrylamide-Forming Potential in Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–116 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N effect depended on potato type and variety.

Material
varietye0
Outcome
effecte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect is type- (French fry, chipping, and boiling) and variety-dependent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application reduced glucose concentration.

Treatment
S applicatione0
Outcome
glucose concentrationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S application reduced glucose concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1352 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur mitigated high N effects on acrylamide potential in some French fry potatoes.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
Sulfur Fertilizationt0
Outcome
acrylamide-forming potentiale0
Direction
mitigatede0
Comparator
high N applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mitigated the effect of high N application on the acrylamide-forming potential of some of the French fry-type potatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of Nitrogen and Sulfur Fertilization on Free Amino Acids, Sugars, and Acrylamide-Forming Potential in Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.