Paper · 2002 · International Journal of Pest Management

Systemic insecticides for control of Delphacodes kuscheli and the Mal de Río Cuarto virus on maize

G. J. March; J. A. Ornaghi; J. E. Beviacqua; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Control of the Mal de Río Cuarto virus (MRCV) and its planthopper vector Delphacodes kuscheli was studied on maize hybrids whose seeds had been treated with systemic insecticides. Laboratory tests were performed to determine the effects of seed treatments with insecticides (acephate, carbofuran, imidacloprid) on the survival of the planthopper. Field experiments using four maize hybrids whose seeds had been treated with the insecticides were performed to establish the effect of the latter on MRCV incidence and severity, and on grain yield. MRCV infection was confirmed by DAS-ELISA. Carbofuran was the most effective insecticide in laboratory tests, independently of the hybrid tested, followed by imidacloprid and acephate. MRCV incidences were high in all treatments in the field test under natural planthopper infestations. Disease severity data analysis indicated that the insecticide - hybrid interaction was not significant. Maize hybrid Dekalb 664 and the imidacloprid treatments had the lowest severity means among the four hybrids and three insecticide treatments, respectively. Data for grain yield showed that the insecticide - hybrid interaction was significant and imidacloprid was generally the most effective in the field experiments. A negative correlation was observed between the mean disease severity index and mean grain yield. The results suggest that if an effective systemic insecticide is applied as a seed coating, it may be possible to obtain good control of D. kuscheli, decrease MRCV severity and increase grain yield under field conditions in areas at risk for MRCV.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In laboratory tests carbofuran was the most effective seed-treatment insecticide against the planthopper Delphacodes kuscheli, followed by imidacloprid and acephate, independently of the maize hybrid.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Carbofurane1
Interactor
Delphacodes kuscheliDelphacodes kuschelie0pest
Outcome
most effective insecticidee1
Direction
most effectivee1
Comparator
imidacloprid and acephatee1
Setting
laboratory testse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control of the Mal de Río Cuarto virus (MRCV) and its planthopper vector Delphacodes kuscheli was studied on maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Carbofuran was the most effective insecticide in laboratory tests, independently of the hybrid tested, followed by imidacloprid and acephate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–729 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MRCV incidences were high in all insecticide treatments in the field test under natural planthopper infestations.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
MRCVMal de Rio Cuarto viruse1pathogen
Outcome
MRCV incidencese1
Direction
highe1
Setting
field teste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize hybrids whose seeds had been treated with systemic insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–178 · show in text ↑
e1

“MRCV incidences were high in all treatments in the field test under natural planthopper infestations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The insecticide by hybrid interaction for MRCV disease severity was not significant.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
insecticide - hybrid interactione1
Outcome
Disease severitye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize hybrids whose seeds had been treated with systemic insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–178 · show in text ↑
e1

“Disease severity data analysis indicated that the insecticide - hybrid interaction was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize hybrid Dekalb 664 had the lowest disease severity mean among the four hybrids.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Material
Dekalb 664e0
Outcome
severity meanse0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
four hybridse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize hybrid Dekalb 664 and the imidacloprid treatments had the lowest severity means among the four hybrids and three insecticide treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1092 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid treatment had the lowest disease severity mean among the three insecticide treatments.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
imidaclopride0
Outcome
severity meanse0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
three insecticide treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize hybrid Dekalb 664 and the imidacloprid treatments had the lowest severity means among the four hybrids and three insecticide treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The insecticide by hybrid interaction for grain yield was significant.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
insecticide - hybrid interactione1
Outcome
grain yielde1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize hybrids whose seeds had been treated with systemic insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–178 · show in text ↑
e1

“Data for grain yield showed that the insecticide - hybrid interaction was significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid was generally the most effective insecticide treatment for grain yield in the field experiments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
imidaclopride1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
most effectivee1
Setting
field experimentse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize hybrids whose seeds had been treated with systemic insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–178 · show in text ↑
e1

“Data for grain yield showed that the insecticide - hybrid interaction was significant and imidacloprid was generally the most effective in the field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1254 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean disease severity index was negatively correlated with mean grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
mean grain yielde1
Direction
negative correlatione1
Comparator
mean disease severity indexe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize hybrids whose seeds had been treated with systemic insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–178 · show in text ↑
e1

“A negative correlation was observed between the mean disease severity index and mean grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1352 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that an effective systemic insecticide applied as a seed coating may give good control of D. kuscheli, decrease MRCV severity and increase grain yield under field conditions in areas at risk.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
effective systemic insecticide is applied as a seed coatinge1
Interactor
D. kuscheliDelphacodes kuschelie1pest
Outcome
good control of D. kuscheli, decrease MRCV severity and increase grain yielde1
Setting
field conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize hybrids whose seeds had been treated with systemic insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–178 · show in text ↑
e1

“if an effective systemic insecticide is applied as a seed coating, it may be possible to obtain good control of D. kuscheli, decrease MRCV severity and increase grain yield under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1574 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

insecticide · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

21 papers: 14 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.