Paper · 2015 · Crop and Pasture Science

Improving grain yields on a sodic clay soil in a temperate, medium-rainfall cropping environment

R. D. Armstrong; C. Eagle; R. Flood

17
claims
32
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil constraints are a major limitation to grain production on waterlogging-prone sodic soils in the medium-rainfall zone of southern Australia, and several options have been proposed to overcome these constraints. A field experiment commenced in 1999 to compare the effectiveness of different management strategies, including improved crop nutrition, soil amelioration by using gypsum with or without deep ripping, applying organic matter, using raised beds or delayed sowing on improving the growth and grain yields of four consecutive crops including wheat (Triticum aestivum) in 1999 and 2002, barley (Hordeum vulgare) in 2000, and faba beans (Vicia faba) in 2001. Improving crop nutrition alone generally did not significantly improve grain yields, whereas adding ameliorants such as composted pig bedding–litter or deep ripping + gypsum produced grain yield increases in all crops by up to 48% compared with the control. Similar increases in grain yields were produced when crops were grown on raised beds, even in seasons when growing-season rainfall was well below average. Greatest yield increases were recorded when both raised beds and ameliorants were used (up to 2 t/ha, or 63%). Spring-sown crops consistently produced lower grain yields than the (autumn-sown) control. For the three cereal crops (two wheat and one barley), increases in grain yields resulting from soil amelioration generally were not associated with increased harvest index or kernel size but were associated with greater tiller number and number of grains per m2. For the pulse crop, faba beans, yield increases were associated with greater dry matter production and increased number of grains per m2. All management strategies significantly increased crop nitrogen (N) uptake, although this did not necessarily translate to increased grain protein because of a dilution effect in the highest yielding treatments. Increases in grain yield coincided with improved root growth throughout the profile (up to 140 cm depth). All physical amelioration treatments either reduced the degree of temporary waterlogging, as indicated by shallow piezometers, or improved soil structure, as indicated by reduced cone penetrometer resistance, compared with the control. Reduction in soil exchangeable sodium percentage on this highly sodic clay soil, measured within the first season after implementation, was less clear-cut. Increases in grain yield, however, appeared related to improved N supply rather than greater water use. Large increases in grain yields across a range of seasonal conditions appear possible on these soil types in medium-rainfall environments provided both soil structure and nutrition are improved.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Improving crop nutrition alone did not significantly improve grain yields of the crops tested, including wheat.

Treatment
Improving crop nutrition alonee1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
did not significantly improvee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Improving crop nutrition alone generally did not significantly improve grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–752 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding ameliorants increased grain yield in all crops, by up to 48% compared with the control.

Treatment
adding ameliorants such as composted pig bedding–litter or deep ripping + gypsume1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Value
48%e1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“adding ameliorants such as composted pig bedding–litter or deep ripping + gypsum produced grain yield increases in all crops by up to 48% compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–925 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised beds produced similar grain yield increases, including in seasons with well below-average growing-season rainfall.

Treatment
grown on raised bedse1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
Similar increasese1
Qualifier
even in seasons when growing-season rainfall was well below averagee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Similar increases in grain yields were produced when crops were grown on raised beds, even in seasons when growing-season rainfall was well below average”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1080 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greatest yield increases occurred when raised beds and ameliorants were used together, up to 2 t/ha or 63%.

Treatment
both raised beds and ameliorantse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
Greatest yield increasese1
Value
up to 2 t/ha, or 63%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Greatest yield increases were recorded when both raised beds and ameliorants were used (up to 2 t/ha, or 63%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1191 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring-sown crops consistently produced lower grain yields than autumn-sown control crops.

Treatment
Spring-sowne1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
the (autumn-sown) controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Spring-sown crops consistently produced lower grain yields than the (autumn-sown) control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1282 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increases from soil amelioration were associated with greater tiller number and number of grains per m2 in cereals.

Treatment
soil amelioratione1
Outcome
tiller number and number of grains per m2e1
Direction
greatere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“increases in grain yields resulting from soil amelioration generally were not associated with increased harvest index or kernel size but were associated with greater tiller number and number of grains per m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1546 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increases from soil amelioration were not associated with increased harvest index or kernel size in cereals.

Treatment
soil amelioratione1
Outcome
harvest index or kernel sizee1
Direction
not associated with increasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“increases in grain yields resulting from soil amelioration generally were not associated with increased harvest index or kernel size but were associated with greater tiller number and number of grains per m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1546 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In faba beans, yield increases were associated with greater dry matter production.

Taxon
faba beansVicia fabae1
Outcome
dry matter productione1
Direction
greatere1

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“For the pulse crop, faba beans, yield increases were associated with greater dry matter production and increased number of grains per m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1684 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In faba beans, yield increases were associated with an increased number of grains per m2.

Taxon
faba beansVicia fabae1
Outcome
number of grains per m2e1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“For the pulse crop, faba beans, yield increases were associated with greater dry matter production and increased number of grains per m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All management strategies significantly increased crop nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
management strategiese1
Outcome
crop nitrogen (N) uptakee1
Direction
significantly increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All management strategies significantly increased crop nitrogen (N) uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1686–1760 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–579 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest yielding treatments did not necessarily increase grain protein, because of a dilution effect.

Treatment
highest yielding treatmentse1
Outcome
grain proteine1
Direction
did not necessarily translate to increasede1
Qualifier
because of a dilution effecte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“although this did not necessarily translate to increased grain protein because of a dilution effect in the highest yielding treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1762–1896 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increases coincided with improved root growth throughout the profile, to 140 cm depth.

Outcome
root growthe1
Direction
improvede1
Qualifier
throughout the profile (up to 140 cm depth)e1

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Increases in grain yield coincided with improved root growth throughout the profile (up to 140 cm depth)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1898–2002 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physical amelioration treatments reduced temporary waterlogging compared with the control.

Treatment
physical amelioration treatmentse1
Outcome
degree of temporary waterlogginge1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All physical amelioration treatments either reduced the degree of temporary waterlogging, as indicated by shallow piezometers, or improved soil structure, as indicated by reduced cone penetrometer resistance, compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2004–2238 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physical amelioration treatments improved soil structure, shown by reduced cone penetrometer resistance compared with the control.

Treatment
physical amelioration treatmentse1
Outcome
cone penetrometer resistancee1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All physical amelioration treatments either reduced the degree of temporary waterlogging, as indicated by shallow piezometers, or improved soil structure, as indicated by reduced cone penetrometer resistance, compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2004–2238 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–579 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in soil exchangeable sodium percentage within the first season was less clear-cut.

Outcome
soil exchangeable sodium percentagee1
Qualifier
less clear-cute1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Reduction in soil exchangeable sodium percentage on this highly sodic clay soil, measured within the first season after implementation, was less clear-cut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2240–2394 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–579 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increases appeared related to improved N supply rather than greater water use.

Treatment
improved N supplye1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Qualifier
rather than greater water usee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Increases in grain yield, however, appeared related to improved N supply rather than greater water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2396–2498 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–579 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Large grain yield increases appear possible across seasons on these soils when soil structure and nutrition are both improved.

Treatment
both soil structure and nutrition are improvede1
Outcome
grain yieldse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Large increases in grain yields across a range of seasonal conditions appear possible on these soil types in medium-rainfall environments provided both soil structure and nutrition are improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2500–2693 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–579 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 266 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

458 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.