Paper · 1987 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Effects of deep ripping and liming on soil water deficits, sorptivity and penetrometer resistance

GR Steed; TG Reeves; ST Willatt

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Rutherglen, in north-eastern Victoria, to determine the effects of liming and deep ripping on soil water extraction by wheat, sorptivity of water into the soil profile and soil resistance to a penetrometer. The site was typical of many cropping paddocks in the region. In the unmodified state the top 20 cm of the soil profile was acid (pH 4.80) and there was a dense hardpan between 7.5 and 17.5 cm depth. Deep ripping increased water extraction by wheat by an average of 8 mm during a drought season (1982), but had no effect on water use in a wet season (1983). The major effect of ripping was to increase the water use in winter from below the ripped zone (40 cm) compared with the unripped treatment. Lime, either with or without ripping, had no significant effect on crop water extraction. Sorptivity, a measure of infiltration, was increased by ripping alone and by ripping plus lime. Soil resistance to a penetrometer was reduced by deep ripping; an effect which had persisted at least 30 months after the last ripping operation. Economic wheat yield responses were obtained by using deep ripping and liming to improve soil physical properties at this site.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep ripping increased wheat water extraction by 8 mm in the 1982 drought.

Treatment
Deep rippinge0
Outcome
water extractione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8 mme0
Qualifier
during a drought season (1982)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep ripping increased water extraction by wheat by an average of 8 mm during a drought season (1982)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep ripping and liming produced economic wheat yield responses.

Treatment
deep ripping and liminge0
Outcome
wheat yield responsese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Economic wheat yield responses were obtained by using deep ripping and liming to improve soil physical properties at this site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1200 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.