Paper · 2005 · Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science

Assessment of weed infestation and economic returns of maize/cowpea intercrop under different tillage systems in northern Ghana

JM Kombiok; EY Safo; C Quansah; et al.

12
claims
29
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The cost of crop production is mostly attributed to soil tillage and weed control. Against this background,.a field experiment was conducted at Nyankpala in the northern Ghanaian savanna ecology in 2000 and 2001 to assess the ~ffects of tillage and cropping systems (CRPSYT) on ,eed infestation and economic returns of maize (Zea .nays L) intercropped with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L Walp). The results showed that the tractor-ploughed conventional tillage system (Con) and bullock plough (BP) with tillage depths more than 12 cm significantly (P<0.05) increased grain yields of both crops and also significantly reduced weed score, weed count, and the subsequent weed dry matter, probably through deep burying of weed seeds as compared to hand hoe (HH) and zero tillage (ZT) practices. Tillage systems did not influence weed flora, but cropping systems increased the grass composition in maize to about 70 per cent and significantly decreased the broad leaf weeds. The reverse situation was observed in the cowpea and the maize/cowpea intercrop. The predominant grass weed species found on the field were Eleusine iirdica and Digitaria spp., while the broad leaf weeds were Amaranthus spinosis and Tridax procumbens. The highest cost was incurred under ZT due to high cost of herbicides and labour for spraying while the least was in HH, but the highest net benefits and the highest benefit-cost ratio (BCR) were recorded under BP. The maize component yielded higher BCRs in the sole and the intercrops. However, poor rainfall distribution had negative impact on the yield of both crops, resulting in negative BCRs in the inter-row cropping systems in both years. ~ RESUME KOMBIOK, J. M., SAFO, E. Y., QUANSAH, C. & IBANA, S.: Evaluation de l'infestation de mauvaises herbe et les rentabilites economiques de mais/do/ique en /ignes alternantes sous les differents systemes de labour au nord du Ghana. Une part importante du cout de production de culture est attribuee au labour du sol et au desherbage. Dans ce contexte, une experience au terrain s'est deroulee IINyankpala dans I'ecologie de la savane au nord du Ghana en 2000 et 2001 pour evaluer les effects de labour et les systemes de culture (SYTCUL) sur I'infestation de mauvaise herbe et les rentabilites economiques de mars (Zea mays L) seme en lignes alternantes de dolique (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Les systemes de labour se composaient de labour de tracteur comme systeme de labour conventionnel (Con), labour II breufs (LB), houe II main (HM), et labourage zero (LZ); alors que les systemes de culture consistaient de mais seul, dolique seule, systeme de culture de mais/dolique inter-ligne et une jachere en 2000 avec la jachere etant remplace par la systeme de culture de mars/dolique intra-ligne en 2001. Les resultats revelaient que Con et LB avec les profondeurs de labour de plus que 12 cm augmentaient considerablement (P < 0.05) les rendements de grain des deux cultures et egalement reduisaient considerablement nombre de mauvaise herbe, Ie compte de mauvaise herbe et la matiere seche suivante de mauvaise herbe probablement II cause de I'enterrement profond de graines de mauvaise herbe comparee aux pratiques de labourage de HM et LZ. Les systemes de labour n' ont pas influence la flore de mauvaise herbe mais les systemes de culture augmentaient la composition des graminees en mais II 70 % alors qu'ils diminuaient considerablement les mauvaises herbes II feuille large. La situation inverse etait observee en dolique et en mars/dolique en lignes alternantes. Les especes des graminees herbeuses prMominantes rencontrees sur Ie terrain etaient Eleusine indica et Digitaria spp. alors que Provisional communication. Received 30 Sep 02; revised II Feb 03.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage (Con) increased grain yields of maize and cowpea compared with hand hoe and zero tillage

Treatment
tractor-ploughed conventional tillage systeme0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
hand hoe (HH) and zero tillage (ZT)e1
Setting
northern Ghanat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize/cowpea intercrop under different tillage systems in northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“tractor-ploughed conventional tillage system (Con) and bullock plough (BP) with tillage depths more than 12 cm significantly (P<0.05) increased grain yields of both crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–590 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to hand hoe (HH) and zero tillage (ZT) practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bullock plough (BP) with tillage depths over 12 cm increased grain yields of both crops compared with hand hoe and zero tillage

Treatment
bullock plough (BP) with tillage depths more than 12 cme0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
hand hoe (HH) and zero tillage (ZT)e1
Setting
northern Ghanat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize/cowpea intercrop under different tillage systems in northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“tractor-ploughed conventional tillage system (Con) and bullock plough (BP) with tillage depths more than 12 cm significantly (P<0.05) increased grain yields of both crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–590 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to hand hoe (HH) and zero tillage (ZT) practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage (Con) reduced weed score, weed count and weed dry matter compared with hand hoe and zero tillage

Treatment
tractor-ploughed conventional tillage systeme0
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
weed score, weed count, and the subsequent weed dry mattere2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
hand hoe (HH) and zero tillage (ZT)e1
Setting
northern Ghanat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize/cowpea intercrop under different tillage systems in northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“tractor-ploughed conventional tillage system (Con) and bullock plough (BP) with tillage depths more than 12 cm significantly (P<0.05) increased grain yields of both crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–590 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to hand hoe (HH) and zero tillage (ZT) practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–786 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly reduced weed score, weed count, and the subsequent weed dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bullock plough (BP) reduced weed score, weed count and weed dry matter compared with hand hoe and zero tillage

Treatment
bullock plough (BP) with tillage depths more than 12 cme0
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
weed score, weed count, and the subsequent weed dry mattere2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
hand hoe (HH) and zero tillage (ZT)e1
Setting
northern Ghanat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize/cowpea intercrop under different tillage systems in northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“tractor-ploughed conventional tillage system (Con) and bullock plough (BP) with tillage depths more than 12 cm significantly (P<0.05) increased grain yields of both crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–590 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to hand hoe (HH) and zero tillage (ZT) practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–786 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly reduced weed score, weed count, and the subsequent weed dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage systems did not influence the weed flora

Treatment
Tillage systemse3
Interactor
weede3weed
Outcome
weed florae3
Direction
did not influencee3
Setting
northern Ghanat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize/cowpea intercrop under different tillage systems in northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–127 · show in text ↑
e3

“Tillage systems did not influence weed flora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping systems increased grass composition in maize to about 70 per cent

Treatment
cropping systemse4
Interactor
grasse4weed
Outcome
grass composition in maizee4
Direction
increasede4
Value
about 70 per cente4
Setting
northern Ghanat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize/cowpea intercrop under different tillage systems in northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–127 · show in text ↑
e4

“cropping systems increased the grass composition in maize to about 70 per cent and significantly decreased the broad leaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping systems significantly decreased broad leaf weeds

Treatment
cropping systemse4
Interactor
broad leaf weedse4weed
Outcome
broad leaf weedse4
Direction
decreasede4
Setting
northern Ghanat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize/cowpea intercrop under different tillage systems in northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–127 · show in text ↑
e4

“cropping systems increased the grass composition in maize to about 70 per cent and significantly decreased the broad leaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage (ZT) incurred the highest cost of production

Treatment
ZTe5
Outcome
coste5
Direction
higheste5
Setting
northern Ghanat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize/cowpea intercrop under different tillage systems in northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–127 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest cost was incurred under ZT due to high cost of herbicides and labour for spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bullock plough (BP) gave the highest net benefits and benefit-cost ratio

Treatment
BPe6
Outcome
net benefitse6
Direction
higheste6
Qualifier
benefit-cost ratio (BCR)e6
Setting
northern Ghanat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize/cowpea intercrop under different tillage systems in northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–127 · show in text ↑
e6

“the highest net benefits and the highest benefit-cost ratio (BCR) were recorded under BP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maize component had higher BCRs in intercrops than in sole cropping

Taxon
maizeZea mayse7
Treatment
intercropse7
Outcome
BCRse7
Direction
highere7
Comparator
solee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The maize component yielded higher BCRs in the sole and the intercrops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1504 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poor rainfall distribution had a negative impact on the yield of both crops

Treatment
poor rainfall distributione1
Outcome
yield of both cropse1
Direction
negative impacte1
Setting
northern Ghanat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize/cowpea intercrop under different tillage systems in northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“poor rainfall distribution had negative impact on the yield of both crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1588 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inter-row cropping systems gave negative BCRs in both years

Treatment
inter-row cropping systemse1
Outcome
BCRse1
Direction
negativee1
Setting
northern Ghanat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize/cowpea intercrop under different tillage systems in northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“resulting in negative BCRs in the inter-row cropping systems in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1664 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

35 papers: 27 positive, 8 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

cultivation system · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

tillage · weed · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cultivation system · quality: general · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

cultivation system · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

tillage · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 65 positive, 46 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Tillage did not influence percent weed control across herbicide treatments.

    The Influence of Herbicide Formulation on Weed Control in Four Tillage Systems · 1989 · compared with all herbicide treatments

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.