Paper · 1979 · PANS

Weed Control in Rainfed Cotton in Northern Ghana

A. G. Carson

15
claims
34
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In field experiments conducted at the Nyankpala Agricultural Station, Ghana, during 1976–77, soil moisture conditions appeared to be the deciding factor in determining the frequency of handweeding needed to obtain maximum seed cotton yields. In 1976, when planting was early and the late, heavy rains in October prolonged weed growth, two handweedings at 4 and 8 weeks after seeding (w.a.s.) gave comparable yields to continuous weeding and significantly better yields than an alachlor + fluometuron herbicide mixture. Supplementary weeding did not enhance the mixture's performance. In 1977, planting was relatively late and in the peak of the rainy season and so late weed growth was reduced. A single handweeding at 4 w.a.s. gave as good a yield as repeated handweeding treatments under these conditions. The alachlor + fluometuron mixture also gave adequate weed control and again supplementary weeding did not improve it significantly. In herbicide evaluation experiments, the safety and performance of pendimethalin and dinitramine herbicides were much influenced by the rainfall pattern immediately following application. With a relatively drier period following application in 1976, the higher rate of these herbicides depressed yields. This rate produced optimum yields in 1977, however, when a very wet period followed application. Prodiamine and the alachlor + fluometuron mixture were the herbicides least affected by soil moisture and they consistently produced good yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture appeared to determine the handweeding frequency required for maximum seed cotton yields.

Outcome
frequency of handweeding needed to obtain maximum seed cotton yieldse0
Setting
soil moisture conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil moisture conditions appeared to be the deciding factor in determining the frequency of handweeding needed to obtain maximum seed cotton yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Control in Rainfed Cotton in Northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1976, two handweedings produced yields comparable to continuous weeding.

Treatment
two handweedings at 4 and 8 weeks after seeding (w.a.s.)e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
continuous weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1976, when planting was early and the late, heavy rains in October prolonged weed growth, two handweedings at 4 and 8 weeks after seeding (w.a.s.) gave comparable yields to continuous weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Control in Rainfed Cotton in Northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1976, two handweedings gave significantly better yields than alachlor plus fluometuron.

Treatment
two handweedings at 4 and 8 weeks after seeding (w.a.s.)e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
alachlor + fluometuron herbicide mixturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two handweedings at 4 and 8 weeks after seeding (w.a.s.) gave comparable yields to continuous weeding and significantly better yields than an alachlor + fluometuron herbicide mixture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–527 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Control in Rainfed Cotton in Northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementary weeding did not enhance alachlor plus fluometuron performance in 1976.

Treatment
Supplementary weedinge0
Outcome
performancee0
Direction
did not enhancee0
Comparator
mixturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Supplementary weeding did not enhance the mixture's performance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Control in Rainfed Cotton in Northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1977, one handweeding at four weeks produced yields as good as repeated handweeding.

Treatment
single handweeding at 4 w.a.s.e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
as goode0
Comparator
repeated handweeding treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single handweeding at 4 w.a.s. gave as good a yield as repeated handweeding treatments under these conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Control in Rainfed Cotton in Northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alachlor plus fluometuron provided adequate weed control in 1977.

Treatment
alachlor + fluometuron mixturee0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
adequatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The alachlor + fluometuron mixture also gave adequate weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Control in Rainfed Cotton in Northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementary weeding did not significantly improve alachlor plus fluometuron weed control in 1977.

Treatment
supplementary weedinge0
Outcome
improve ite0
Direction
did not improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supplementary weeding did not improve it significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Control in Rainfed Cotton in Northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall immediately after application influenced pendimethalin safety and performance.

Treatment
pendimethaline0
Outcome
safety and performancee0
Direction
influencede0
Setting
rainfall pattern immediately following applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the safety and performance of pendimethalin and dinitramine herbicides were much influenced by the rainfall pattern immediately following application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Control in Rainfed Cotton in Northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall immediately after application influenced dinitramine safety and performance.

Treatment
dinitraminee0
Outcome
safety and performancee0
Direction
influencede0
Setting
rainfall pattern immediately following applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the safety and performance of pendimethalin and dinitramine herbicides were much influenced by the rainfall pattern immediately following application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Control in Rainfed Cotton in Northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher pendimethalin rates depressed cotton yields in the drier 1976 conditions.

Treatment
pendimethaline1
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
depressede0
Qualifier
relatively drier periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With a relatively drier period following application in 1976, the higher rate of these herbicides depressed yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1253 · show in text ↑
e1

“pendimethalin and dinitramine herbicides were much influenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Control in Rainfed Cotton in Northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher dinitramine rates depressed cotton yields in the drier 1976 conditions.

Treatment
dinitraminee1
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
depressede0
Qualifier
relatively drier periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With a relatively drier period following application in 1976, the higher rate of these herbicides depressed yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1253 · show in text ↑
e1

“pendimethalin and dinitramine herbicides were much influenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Control in Rainfed Cotton in Northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher pendimethalin rates produced optimum cotton yields in wet 1977 conditions.

Treatment
pendimethaline1
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
optimume0
Qualifier
very wet periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This rate produced optimum yields in 1977, however, when a very wet period followed application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1350 · show in text ↑
e1

“pendimethalin and dinitramine herbicides were much influenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Control in Rainfed Cotton in Northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher dinitramine rates produced optimum cotton yields in wet 1977 conditions.

Treatment
dinitraminee1
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
optimume0
Qualifier
very wet periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This rate produced optimum yields in 1977, however, when a very wet period followed application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1350 · show in text ↑
e1

“pendimethalin and dinitramine herbicides were much influenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Control in Rainfed Cotton in Northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prodiamine was among herbicides least affected by soil moisture and consistently yielded well.

Treatment
Prodiaminee0
Outcome
good yieldse0
Direction
goode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prodiamine and the alachlor + fluometuron mixture were the herbicides least affected by soil moisture and they consistently produced good yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Control in Rainfed Cotton in Northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alachlor plus fluometuron was among herbicides least affected by soil moisture and consistently yielded well.

Treatment
alachlor + fluometuron mixturee0
Outcome
good yieldse0
Direction
goode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prodiamine and the alachlor + fluometuron mixture were the herbicides least affected by soil moisture and they consistently produced good yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Control in Rainfed Cotton in Northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

49 papers: 43 positive, 6 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Dinitramine · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

alachlor · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fluometuron · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.