Paper · 2008 · International Journal of Vegetable Science

Influence of Tillage, Cover Crop, and Preemergence Herbicides on Weed Control and Pumpkin Yield

S. Alan Walters; Bryan G. Young; Ronald F. Krausz

12
claims
20
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Many Midwestern and Eastern U.S. jack-o-lantern pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) growers are interested in using no-tillage production practices. However, improved weed management practices must be developed before no-tillage will be readily adopted for pumpkin production. A field study was conducted to determine effects of tillage, winter rye (Secale cereale L.), and preemergence herbicides on weed control and pumpkin yield. Grass and broadleaf weed control was greater in no-tillage compared to conventional tillage, and cover crop use in a no-tillage system further improved the level of weed control. Early- and late-season control of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm.), common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.), redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), and common waterhemp (A. rudis Sauer) were highly correlated (0.48 ≥ r ≤ 0.86, P ≤ 0.01) with pumpkin yield and fruit size. Although applying clomazone+ethalfluralin to winter rye residues improved broadleaf weed control compared with no herbicide, the level of control for all broadleaf species was unacceptable (∼86%) by 60 days after herbicide treatment (DAT), regardless of tillage treatment. However, addition of halosulfuron or imazamox to clomazone+ethafluralin generally improved redroot pigweed and common waterhemp control in no-tillage and conventional tillage compared with clomazone+ethafluralin alone; common cocklebur control was improved with addition of halosulfuron only to clomazone+ethafluralin. Although pumpkin fruit numbers in the weed-free control did not differ (P > 0.05) from tank mixtures of clomazone+ethalfluralin with halosulfuron or imazamox, reductions in pumpkin fruit size (30–35%) and yields (18–20%) were observed for these herbicide treatments compared with the weed-free control. This research indicates that cover crops, such as winter rye, can be successfully integrated in no-tillage pumpkin production systems along with herbicides to improve weed management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage improved grass and broadleaf weed control over conventional tillage.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
no-tillagee0
Outcome
Grass and broadleaf weed controle0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“Grass and broadleaf weed control was greater in no-tillage compared to conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A cover crop further improved weed control in no-tillage.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
cover crop use in a no-tillage systeme0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“cover crop use in a no-tillage system further improved the level of weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early and late control of four weed species was correlated with pumpkin yield and fruit size.

Taxon
pumpkine0
Treatment
Early- and late-season controle0
Interactor
giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm.)Setaria faberie0weed
Outcome
pumpkin yield and fruit sizee0
Value
0.48 ≥ r ≤ 0.86e0
Qualifier
common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.), redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), and common waterhemp (A. rudis Sauer)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria faberi
Setaria faberi · InteractorKropsoq · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early- and late-season control of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm.), common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.), redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), and common waterhemp (A. rudis Sauer) were highly correlated (0.48 ≥ r ≤ 0.86, P ≤ 0.01) with pumpkin yield and fruit size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clomazone plus ethalfluralin on rye residues improved broadleaf weed control over no herbicide.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
clomazone+ethalfluralin to winter rye residuese0
Outcome
broadleaf weed controle0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
no herbicidee0

Verbatim

e0

“applying clomazone+ethalfluralin to winter rye residues improved broadleaf weed control compared with no herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadleaf weed control was unacceptable at about 86% after 60 days regardless of tillage.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Outcome
level of control for all broadleaf speciese0
Value
∼86%e0
Qualifier
by 60 days after herbicide treatment (DAT), regardless of tillage treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“the level of control for all broadleaf species was unacceptable (∼86%) by 60 days after herbicide treatment (DAT), regardless of tillage treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding halosulfuron improved redroot pigweed and common waterhemp control.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
addition of halosulfurone0
Outcome
redroot pigweed and common waterhemp controle0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
clomazone+ethafluralin alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“addition of halosulfuron or imazamox to clomazone+ethafluralin generally improved redroot pigweed and common waterhemp control in no-tillage and conventional tillage compared with clomazone+ethafluralin alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding imazamox improved redroot pigweed and common waterhemp control.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
imazamox to clomazone+ethafluraline0
Outcome
redroot pigweed and common waterhemp controle0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
clomazone+ethafluralin alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“addition of halosulfuron or imazamox to clomazone+ethafluralin generally improved redroot pigweed and common waterhemp control in no-tillage and conventional tillage compared with clomazone+ethafluralin alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding halosulfuron improved common cocklebur control.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
addition of halosulfuron only to clomazone+ethafluraline0
Outcome
common cocklebur controle0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“common cocklebur control was improved with addition of halosulfuron only to clomazone+ethafluralin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1488 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkin fruit numbers with herbicide tank mixtures did not differ significantly from weed-free controls.

Taxon
pumpkine0
Treatment
tank mixtures of clomazone+ethalfluralin with halosulfuron or imazamoxe0
Outcome
pumpkin fruit numberse0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
weed-free controle0

Verbatim

e0

“pumpkin fruit numbers in the weed-free control did not differ (P > 0.05) from tank mixtures of clomazone+ethalfluralin with halosulfuron or imazamox”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide tank mixtures reduced pumpkin fruit size by 30–35% relative to weed-free controls.

Taxon
pumpkine0
Treatment
these herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
pumpkin fruit sizee0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
30–35%e0
Comparator
weed-free controle0

Verbatim

e0

“reductions in pumpkin fruit size (30–35%) and yields (18–20%) were observed for these herbicide treatments compared with the weed-free control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide tank mixtures reduced pumpkin yield by 18–20% relative to weed-free controls.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
these herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
18–20%e0
Comparator
weed-free controle0

Verbatim

e0

“reductions in pumpkin fruit size (30–35%) and yields (18–20%) were observed for these herbicide treatments compared with the weed-free control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend integrating winter rye cover crops with herbicides in no-tillage pumpkin production.

Taxon
pumpkine0
Outcome
integrated in no-tillage pumpkin production systems along with herbicides to improve weed managemente0

Verbatim

e0

“cover crops, such as winter rye, can be successfully integrated in no-tillage pumpkin production systems along with herbicides to improve weed management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1822–1975 · show in text ↑

Halosulfuron-methyl · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results differ

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Halosulfuron-methyl · control · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

imazamox · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 4 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

tillage · weed · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.