Paper · 1974 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Effects of plant density, irrigation and potassium and sodium fertilizers on sugar beet: I. Yields and nutrient composition

A. P. Draycott; M. J. Durrant; D. J. Webb

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary Three experiments (1970–2) on calcareous sandy loan tested all combinations of four plant densities (18500–124000 plants/ha), two amounts of potassium (0, 156 kg/K/ha) and sodium (0, 247 kg/Na/ha) fertilizer and two watering treatments on yield and chemical composition of sugar beet. The main effects of the treatments in all three experiments confirmed that at least 75000 plants/ha were needed for maximum sugar yield, that sodium fertilizer increased sugar yield more than potassium (+0.76 and +0.29 t/ha respectively) and that the crop responded to irrigation in some years (+1.35 t sugar/ha in 1970 and +1.67 t/ha in 1972). Analysis of the growth of the crop showed that increasing the plant density increased leaf growth per unit area from singling onwards and giving irrigation increased it from July; the effects persisted until harvest and were reflected in increased sugar yields. Fertilizer increased leaf growth early in the season but the effect disappeared later, although sugar yield was still increased. Interactions between plant density, fertilizer treatment and irrigation were small every year but there were some consistent effects on sugar yield. The results suggest that in commercial practice the optimum density is 75000 plants/ha; where irrigation is not practised, 247 kg/ha of sodium and 70 kg/ha of potassium fertilizer should be given. Where irrigation is applied, only 247 kg/ha of sodium needs to be given as the extra water increases the uptake of soil potassium.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At least 75000 plants/ha were needed for maximum sugar yield.

Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
75000 plants/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at least 75000 plants/ha were needed for maximum sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–428 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium fertilizer increased sugar yield by 0.76 t/ha.

Treatment
sodium fertilizere0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
+0.76e0
Comparator
potassiume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sodium fertilizer increased sugar yield more than potassium (+0.76 and +0.29 t/ha respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilizer increased sugar yield by 0.29 t/ha.

Treatment
potassiume0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
+0.29 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sodium fertilizer increased sugar yield more than potassium (+0.76 and +0.29 t/ha respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased sugar yield by 1.35 t/ha in 1970.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
sugare0
Direction
respondede0
Value
+1.35 t sugar/hae0
Qualifier
1970e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the crop responded to irrigation in some years (+1.35 t sugar/ha in 1970 and +1.67 t/ha in 1972).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased sugar yield by 1.67 t/ha in 1972.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
sugare0
Direction
respondede0
Value
+1.67 t/hae0
Qualifier
1972e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the crop responded to irrigation in some years (+1.35 t sugar/ha in 1970 and +1.67 t/ha in 1972).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher density increased leaf growth per area from singling to harvest.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
increasing the plant densitye0
Outcome
leaf growth per unit areae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing the plant density increased leaf growth per unit area from singling onwards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–771 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased leaf growth from July to harvest.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
leaf growth per unit areae1
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
from July; the effects persisted until harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“giving irrigation increased it from July; the effects persisted until harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased leaf growth per unit area from singling onwards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer increased early leaf growth but the effect disappeared later.

Treatment
Fertilizere0
Outcome
leaf growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
effect disappeared latere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer increased leaf growth early in the season but the effect disappeared later, although sugar yield was still increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer increased sugar yield despite the transient leaf-growth response.

Treatment
Fertilizere0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer increased leaf growth early in the season but the effect disappeared later, although sugar yield was still increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interactions among density, fertilizer and irrigation were small but consistent for yield.

Outcome
effects on sugar yielde0
Qualifier
small every yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interactions between plant density, fertilizer treatment and irrigation were small every year but there were some consistent effects on sugar yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial sugar beet density should be 75000 plants/ha.

Outcome
optimum density is 75000 plants/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in commercial practice the optimum density is 75000 plants/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Without irrigation, apply sodium and potassium fertilizers at the recommended rates.

Outcome
247 kg/ha of sodium and 70 kg/ha of potassium fertilizer should be givene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“where irrigation is not practised, 247 kg/ha of sodium and 70 kg/ha of potassium fertilizer should be given.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

With irrigation, only sodium fertilizer is recommended.

Outcome
only 247 kg/ha of sodium needs to be givene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Where irrigation is applied, only 247 kg/ha of sodium needs to be given as the extra water increases the uptake of soil potassium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑

sodium atom · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

105 papers: 88 positive, 17 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

potassium · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

irrigation · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 34 positive, 17 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

density · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.