Paper · 2001 · Weed Biology and Management

Comparison of physiological effects of fluazifop‐butyl and sethoxydim on oat (Avena sativa L.)

Xiaoyong Luo; Hiroshi Matsumoto; Kenji Usui

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Laboratory experiments were conducted to compare the physiological effects of two herbicides: fluazifop‐butyl {butyl ( RS )‐2‐[4‐(5‐trifluoromethyl‐2‐pyridyloxy)phenoxy]‐propionate} and sethoxydim {(±)‐2‐[1‐(ethoxyimino)butyl]‐5‐[2‐(ethylthio)propyl]‐3‐hydroxy‐2‐cyclohexen‐1‐one} on oat ( Avena sativa L. cv. Zenshin). The herbicides strongly inhibited growth of oat and induced chlorosis at the basal part of shoots and ethylene production from the seedlings. The phytotoxicity of these herbicides in oat seedlings was alleviated by 2,4‐D (2,4‐dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), but not by IAA (indole‐3‐acetic acid). Coleoptile elongation induced by 2,4‐D or IAA was inhibited by fluazifop‐butyl and sethoxydim, suggesting both herbicides possess the activity to inhibit this auxin action. Fluazifop (free acid) and sethoxydim inhibited proton excretion from oat roots but fluazifop‐butyl did not. This proton excretion was not restored by 2,4‐D or IAA. Furthermore, cellular electrolyte leakage in oat shoots was increased by both herbicides, indicating that the membrane permeability was increased. We conclude that fluazifop‐butyl and sethoxydim may have the same mechanism of action which leads to disruption of membrane integrity, although fluazifop‐butyl acts as a free acid after hydrolysis (fluazifop).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicides strongly inhibited growth of oat.

Treatment
herbicidese1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
inhibitede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on oat ( Avena sativa L. cv. Zenshin)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–318 · show in text ↑
e1

“The herbicides strongly inhibited growth of oat and induced chlorosis at the basal part of shoots and ethylene production from the seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicides induced chlorosis at the basal part of oat shoots and ethylene production from seedlings.

Treatment
herbicidese1
Outcome
chlorosis at the basal part of shoots and ethylene productione1
Direction
inducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on oat ( Avena sativa L. cv. Zenshin)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–318 · show in text ↑
e1

“The herbicides strongly inhibited growth of oat and induced chlorosis at the basal part of shoots and ethylene production from the seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D alleviated the phytotoxicity of the herbicides in oat seedlings.

Treatment
2,4‐De2
Outcome
phytotoxicitye2
Direction
alleviatede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The phytotoxicity of these herbicides in oat seedlings was alleviated by 2,4‐D (2,4‐dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), but not by IAA (indole‐3‐acetic acid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA did not alleviate the phytotoxicity of the herbicides in oat seedlings.

Treatment
IAAe2
Outcome
phytotoxicitye2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
2,4‐De2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The phytotoxicity of these herbicides in oat seedlings was alleviated by 2,4‐D (2,4‐dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), but not by IAA (indole‐3‐acetic acid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluazifop-butyl and sethoxydim inhibited coleoptile elongation induced by 2,4-D or IAA in oat.

Treatment
fluazifop‐butyl and sethoxydime3
Outcome
Coleoptile elongatione3
Direction
inhibitede3
Comparator
2,4‐D or IAAe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on oat ( Avena sativa L. cv. Zenshin)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–318 · show in text ↑
e3

“Coleoptile elongation induced by 2,4‐D or IAA was inhibited by fluazifop‐butyl and sethoxydim, suggesting both herbicides possess the activity to inhibit this auxin action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluazifop (free acid) and sethoxydim inhibited proton excretion from oat roots.

Organ / stage
rootse4
Treatment
Fluazifop (free acid) and sethoxydime4
Outcome
proton excretione4
Direction
inhibitede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Fluazifop (free acid) and sethoxydim inhibited proton excretion from oat roots but fluazifop‐butyl did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluazifop-butyl did not inhibit proton excretion from oat roots.

Organ / stage
rootse4
Treatment
fluazifop‐butyle4
Outcome
proton excretione4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Fluazifop (free acid) and sethoxydim inhibited proton excretion from oat roots but fluazifop‐butyl did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both herbicides increased cellular electrolyte leakage in oat shoots.

Organ / stage
shootse5
Treatment
herbicidese5
Outcome
cellular electrolyte leakage in oat shootse5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Furthermore, cellular electrolyte leakage in oat shoots was increased by both herbicides, indicating that the membrane permeability was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1096 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluazifop-butyl and sethoxydim may share a mechanism that disrupts oat membrane integrity.

Treatment
fluazifop‐butyl and sethoxydime6
Outcome
disruption of membrane integritye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on oat ( Avena sativa L. cv. Zenshin)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–318 · show in text ↑
e6

“We conclude that fluazifop‐butyl and sethoxydim may have the same mechanism of action which leads to disruption of membrane integrity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1231 · show in text ↑

Sethoxydim · molecular: metabolites · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

fluazifop-butyl · molecular: metabolites · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

2,4-D · crop injury · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Sethoxydim · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 5 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.