Paper · 1985 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Accumulation of Heat Shock Proteins in Field-Grown Cotton

John J. Burke; Jerry L. Hatfield; Robert R. Klein; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
134
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants grown under field water deficits exhibited an 80 to 85% reduction in leaf area index, plant height, and dry matter accumulation compared with irrigated controls. Midday photosynthetic rates of dryland plants decreased 2-fold, and canopy temperatures increased to 40 degrees C at 80 days after planting compared with canopy temperatures of 30 degrees C for irrigated plants. Leaves from dryland plants which had exhibited canopy temperatures of 40 degrees C for several weeks accumulated stainable levels of polypeptides with apparent molecular weights of 100, 94, 89, 75, 60, 58, 37, and 21 kilodaltons. These polypeptides did not accumulate in leaves from irrigated plants.Addition of [(35)S]methionine to leaves of growth chamber-grown cotton plants and subsequent incubation at 40 degrees C for 3 hours radiolabeled polypeptides with molecular weights similar to those that accumulate in dryland cotton leaves. These data suggest that the proteins which accumulate in water-stressed cotton leaves at elevated temperatures (40 degrees C) are heat shock proteins and that these proteins can accumulate to substantial levels in field-stressed plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field water deficits reduced leaf area index, plant height and dry matter accumulation of cotton by 80 to 85% compared with irrigated controls.

Taxon
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
field water deficitse1
Outcome
leaf area index, plant height, and dry matter accumulatione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
80 to 85%e1
Comparator
irrigated controlse1
Setting
fielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants grown under field water deficits exhibited an 80 to 85% reduction in leaf area index, plant height, and dry matter accumulation compared with irrigated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Midday photosynthetic rates of dryland cotton plants decreased 2-fold.

Taxon
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
drylande2
Outcome
Midday photosynthetic ratese2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
2-folde2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants grown under field water deficits exhibited an 80 to 85% reduction in leaf area index, plant height, and dry matter accumulation compared with irrigated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–198 · show in text ↑
e2

“Midday photosynthetic rates of dryland plants decreased 2-fold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy temperature of dryland cotton rose to 40 degrees C at 80 days after planting, compared with 30 degrees C for irrigated plants.

Taxon
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
field water deficitse1
Outcome
canopy temperaturese3
Direction
increasede3
Value
40 degrees Ce3
Qualifier
80 days after plantinge3
Comparator
irrigated plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants grown under field water deficits exhibited an 80 to 85% reduction in leaf area index, plant height, and dry matter accumulation compared with irrigated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–198 · show in text ↑
e3

“canopy temperatures increased to 40 degrees C at 80 days after planting compared with canopy temperatures of 30 degrees C for irrigated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves of dryland cotton accumulated stainable polypeptides of 100, 94, 89, 75, 60, 58, 37 and 21 kDa that did not accumulate in irrigated leaves.

Taxon
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Organ / stage
Leavese4
Treatment
drylande4
Outcome
stainable levels of polypeptidese4
Value
100, 94, 89, 75, 60, 58, 37, and 21 kilodaltonse4
Comparator
irrigated plantse5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants grown under field water deficits exhibited an 80 to 85% reduction in leaf area index, plant height, and dry matter accumulation compared with irrigated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–198 · show in text ↑
e4

“Leaves from dryland plants which had exhibited canopy temperatures of 40 degrees C for several weeks accumulated stainable levels of polypeptides with apparent molecular weights of 100, 94, 89, 75, 60, 58, 37, and 21 kilodaltons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–640 · show in text ↑
e5

“These polypeptides did not accumulate in leaves from irrigated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiolabeled polypeptides of cotton leaves incubated at 40 degrees C for 3 hours had molecular weights similar to those accumulating in dryland cotton leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese6
Treatment
incubation at 40 degrees C for 3 hourse6
Outcome
radiolabeled polypeptidese6
Comparator
dryland cotton leavese6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Addition of [(35)S]methionine to leaves of growth chamber-grown cotton plants and subsequent incubation at 40 degrees C for 3 hours radiolabeled polypeptides with molecular weights similar to those that accumulate in dryland cotton leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–950 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The proteins accumulating in water-stressed cotton leaves at elevated temperature are suggested to be heat shock proteins.

Treatment
water-stressede7
Outcome
heat shock proteinse7
Qualifier
These data suggeste7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“These data suggest that the proteins which accumulate in water-stressed cotton leaves at elevated temperatures (40 degrees C) are heat shock proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1101 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat shock proteins can accumulate to substantial levels in field-stressed cotton plants.

Taxon
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
field-stressede2
Outcome
accumulate to substantial levelse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants grown under field water deficits exhibited an 80 to 85% reduction in leaf area index, plant height, and dry matter accumulation compared with irrigated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–198 · show in text ↑
e2

“these proteins can accumulate to substantial levels in field-stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1187 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 19 positive, 63 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

drought · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 25 positive, 61 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.