Paper · 1996 · Crop Science

Late Season Water Stress in Cotton: I. Plant Growth, Water Use, and Yield

T. J. Gerik; K. L. Faver; P. M. Thaxton; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
140
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The behavior of water stressed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) is well documented but our knowledge of traits which can be genetically manipulated to improve drought tolerance is incomplete. This study was conducted to determine which morphological and physiological factors lessen the effects of water stress on the yield of two short‐season cultivars [i.e., TAMCOT HQ95 (HQ95)and (G&P 74+ (GP74)] with a common parent in ancestry. Plants were grown in a rain shelter‐ lysimeter facility containing a Pedernales fine sandy loam soil (fine, mixed, thermic Udic Paleustalf)in 1990 and 1991 at Temple, TX. Water stress was imposed by replenishing a fraction of the water lost to evapotranspiration, beginning about 78 d after emergence. HQ95 and GP74 did not differ in leaf area index( LAI) or in the rate of leaf area development before water stress was imposed. The rate of LAI decline and average LAI were similar between cultivas when water stress was imposed. HQ95 used more water and used it at a faster rate than GP74 when water stressed. HQ95 produced more bolls and had higher yield under both well‐watered and water stressed conditions than GP74 in each of the 2 yr. The largest difference in boll load between cultivars occurred on sympodia branches in the lower canopy, where HQ95 had 37, 60, and 182% more bolls than GP74 when plants received 0, 50 or 75, and 100% of the depleted soil water. Whether well watered or water stressed, individual boll weight did not differ between the two cultivars. However, the harvest index and the production efficiency of bolls (i.e., bossl pr unit leaf area)of HQ95 was consistently higher than GP74 for all water regimes. On average, HQ95 located 21% more dry matter to yield and produced 32% more bolls per square meter than GP74. While differences in yield between the cultivars mirror harvest index, large differences in boll production efficiency suggested that the intrinsic photosynthetic capacity of HQ95 may be greater than GP74.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HQ95 and GP74 did not differ in leaf area index or in the rate of leaf area development before water stress was imposed.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Material
HQ95 and GP74e1
Outcome
leaf area indexe1
Qualifier
before water stress was imposede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stressed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“HQ95 and GP74 did not differ in leaf area index( LAI) or in the rate of leaf area development before water stress was imposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–860 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rate of LAI decline and average LAI were similar between the two cultivars when water stress was imposed.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
water stresse1
Outcome
rate of LAI decline and average LAIe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stressed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rate of LAI decline and average LAI were similar between cultivas when water stress was imposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–961 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HQ95 used more water than GP74 when water stressed, and used it at a faster rate.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Material
HQ95e1
Treatment
water stressede1
Outcome
watere1
Direction
moree1
Qualifier
at a faster ratee1
Comparator
GP74e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stressed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“HQ95 used more water and used it at a faster rate than GP74 when water stressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HQ95 produced more bolls than GP74 under both well-watered and water-stressed conditions in each of the 2 years.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Material
HQ95e1
Treatment
well‐watered and water stressed conditionse1
Outcome
bollse1
Direction
moree1
Qualifier
in each of the 2 yre1
Comparator
GP74e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stressed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“HQ95 produced more bolls and had higher yield under both well‐watered and water stressed conditions than GP74 in each of the 2 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HQ95 had higher yield than GP74 under both well-watered and water-stressed conditions.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Material
HQ95e1
Treatment
well‐watered and water stressed conditionse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
GP74e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stressed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“HQ95 produced more bolls and had higher yield under both well‐watered and water stressed conditions than GP74 in each of the 2 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest difference in boll load between cultivars was on sympodia branches in the lower canopy, where HQ95 had 37, 60 and 182% more bolls than GP74 at 0, 50 or 75, and 100% replacement of depleted soil water.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Material
HQ95e1
Treatment
0, 50 or 75, and 100% of the depleted soil watere1
Outcome
boll loade1
Direction
moree1
Value
37, 60, and 182%e1
Qualifier
sympodia branches in the lower canopye1
Comparator
GP74e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stressed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“The largest difference in boll load between cultivars occurred on sympodia branches in the lower canopy, where HQ95 had 37, 60, and 182% more bolls than GP74 when plants received 0, 50 or 75, and 100% of the depleted soil water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1402 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual boll weight did not differ between the two cultivars, whether well watered or water stressed.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Outcome
individual boll weighte1
Qualifier
Whether well watered or water stressede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stressed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“Whether well watered or water stressed, individual boll weight did not differ between the two cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HQ95 had a consistently higher harvest index and boll production efficiency than GP74 across all water regimes.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Material
HQ95e1
Treatment
all water regimese1
Outcome
harvest index and the production efficiency of bollse1
Direction
consistently highere1
Comparator
GP74e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stressed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, the harvest index and the production efficiency of bolls (i.e., bossl pr unit leaf area)of HQ95 was consistently higher than GP74 for all water regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1669 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On average, HQ95 located 21% more dry matter to yield than GP74.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Material
HQ95e1
Outcome
dry matter to yielde1
Direction
moree1
Value
21%e1
Comparator
GP74e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stressed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“On average, HQ95 located 21% more dry matter to yield and produced 32% more bolls per square meter than GP74”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1779 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On average, HQ95 produced 32% more bolls per square meter than GP74.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Material
HQ95e1
Outcome
bolls per square metere1
Direction
moree1
Value
32%e1
Comparator
GP74e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stressed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“On average, HQ95 located 21% more dry matter to yield and produced 32% more bolls per square meter than GP74”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1779 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in yield between the cultivars mirror their harvest index differences.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Material
HQ95e1
Outcome
differences in yield between the cultivarse1
Qualifier
mirror harvest indexe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stressed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“While differences in yield between the cultivars mirror harvest index, large differences in boll production efficiency suggested that the intrinsic photosynthetic capacity of HQ95 may be greater than GP74”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1985 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Large differences in boll production efficiency suggest that the intrinsic photosynthetic capacity of HQ95 may be greater than that of GP74.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Material
HQ95e1
Outcome
boll production efficiencye1
Qualifier
intrinsic photosynthetic capacitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stressed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“While differences in yield between the cultivars mirror harvest index, large differences in boll production efficiency suggested that the intrinsic photosynthetic capacity of HQ95 may be greater than GP74”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1985 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 19 positive, 63 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 304 positive, 95 negative or no effect

303 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.