Paper · 2013 · Plant Production Science

Long-term Effect of Year-Round Tillage Patterns on Yield and Grain Quality of Wheat

Yonglu Tang; Xiaoli Wu; Chaosu Li; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A 7-year field experiment under a rice-wheat rotation system was conducted at Guanghan County in the Chengdu Plain of China from 2004 to investigate the long-term effect of different combinations of year-round tillage patterns and crop straw management on grain yield and quality of wheat. Treatments were rotary-till wheat + rotary-till rice without any straw (conventional treatment, CK), zero-till wheat with rice straw mulching + rotary-till rice with no wheat straw (WZRR), zero-till wheat with rice straw mulching + rotary-till rice with no wheat straw + autumn vegetable (WZRRV), zero-till wheat with rice straw mulching + zero-till rice with wheat straw mulching (WZRZ), and zero-till wheat with rice straw mulching + zero-till rice with wheat straw mulching under ridge-till (WRZB). There was little variation amongst years in grain yield and yield components with the treatment, while CK had lower yields in most years than other treatments with a slight decreasing trend; spike numbers per area had no significant change with the elapse of time. An obvious descending trend in grain number per spike and grains per area for CK and increase in 1000-grain weight for all treatments were observed; zero tillage and straw mulching improved wheat tiller ability, soil available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents at major growth stages, and leaf area index, SPAD, a portable chlorophyll meter reading, and dry matter at middle and late stages. Most grain quality traits of wheat were nearly the same in all treatments in all year-round tillage patterns.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional treatment had lower wheat yields in most years than other treatments.

Treatment
CKe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
most yearse0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CK had lower yields in most years than other treatments with a slight decreasing trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike numbers per area did not change significantly over time.

Outcome
spike numbers per areae0
Direction
no significant changee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike numbers per area had no significant change with the elapse of time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain number per spike and grains per area declined for CK.

Outcome
grain number per spike and grains per areae0
Direction
descendinge0
Qualifier
CKe0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An obvious descending trend in grain number per spike and grains per area for CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand-grain weight increased for all treatments.

Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in 1000-grain weight for all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage and straw mulching improved wheat tiller ability.

Treatment
zero tillage and straw mulchinge0
Outcome
tiller abilitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zero tillage and straw mulching improved wheat tiller ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage and straw mulching improved soil available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium at major growth stages.

Treatment
zero tillage and straw mulchinge0
Outcome
soil available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contentse0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
major growth stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zero tillage and straw mulching improved wheat tiller ability, soil available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents at major growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage and straw mulching improved leaf area index, SPAD and dry matter at middle and late stages.

Treatment
zero tillage and straw mulchinge0
Outcome
leaf area index, SPAD, a portable chlorophyll meter reading, and dry mattere0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
middle and late stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zero tillage and straw mulching improved wheat tiller ability, soil available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents at major growth stages, and leaf area index, SPAD, a portable chlorophyll meter reading, and dry matter at middle and late stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1458 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most wheat grain quality traits were nearly the same across year-round tillage patterns.

Outcome
grain quality traitse0
Direction
nearly the samee0
Qualifier
all year-round tillage patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most grain quality traits of wheat were nearly the same in all treatments in all year-round tillage patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1568 · show in text ↑

organic · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

tillage · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 14 positive, 6 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 79 positive, 10 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 119 positive, 26 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    No-tillage reduced wheat N uptake.

    Long‐Term Tillage and Crop Rotation Effects on Winter Wheat Production in Northern Idaho · 1995 · compared with conventional (CONV, moldboard plow)

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
  3. negative

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.