Paper · 2010 · Tropical Agricultural Research

The Effect of Different Rates of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on the Growth, Yield and Postharvest Life of Cauliflower

DP Kodithuwakku; JP Kirthisinghe

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A Field experiment was conducted to compare the effect of urea as a fertilizer on growth, yield and post harvest life of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L). Four levels of urea were compared with the recommendation of the Department of Agriculture (DOA), using a Randomized Complete Block Design. Other cultural practices and crop protection were done according to the recommendations of the DOA. The plant height at one week after transplanting and 50% flowering, number of leaves at 50% flowering, total leaf area at time of flowering, total number of days to flowering, and time period for curd maturity were recorded in each treatment. The average cauliflower curd yield in the field varied between 90 - 125 g/plant (3.6 – 5.0 t/ha). The results revealed the possibility of increasing N dosage up to 125% of the DOA recommendation for obtaining larger curds and a higher curd yield. Significant difference was not observed (p>0.05) among the treatments in any of the curd quality parameters measured. Even though no significant difference was observed among the post harvest quality, curds of the 50% nitrogen fertilizer treatment stored at room condition and in polythene bags could be kept 6 days & 9 days longer than other treatments, without decay. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/tar.v21i1.2592 Tropical Agricultural Research Vol. 21(1): 110-114 (2009)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field cauliflower curd yield ranged from 90 to 125 g per plant.

Outcome
curd yielde0
Direction
variede0
Value
90 - 125 g/plante0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average cauliflower curd yield in the field varied between 90 - 125 g/plant (3.6 – 5.0 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–736 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field cauliflower yield ranged from 3.6 to 5.0 t/ha.

Outcome
curd yielde0
Direction
variede0
Value
3.6 – 5.0 t/hae0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average cauliflower curd yield in the field varied between 90 - 125 g/plant (3.6 – 5.0 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen dosage up to 125% of the DOA recommendation produced larger cauliflower curds.

Treatment
increasing N dosage up to 125% of the DOA recommendatione0
Outcome
curdse0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
DOA recommendatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed the possibility of increasing N dosage up to 125% of the DOA recommendation for obtaining larger curds and a higher curd yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen dosage up to 125% of the DOA recommendation produced a higher cauliflower curd yield.

Treatment
increasing N dosage up to 125% of the DOA recommendatione0
Outcome
curd yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
DOA recommendatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed the possibility of increasing N dosage up to 125% of the DOA recommendation for obtaining larger curds and a higher curd yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cauliflower curd quality parameters did not differ significantly among urea treatments.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
curd quality parameterse0
Direction
not observede0
Comparator
among the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant difference was not observed (p>0.05) among the treatments in any of the curd quality parameters measured.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cauliflower curds given 50% nitrogen fertilizer and stored at room condition lasted 6 days longer without decay than other treatments.

Treatment
50% nitrogen fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
without decaye0
Direction
longere0
Value
6 dayse0
Comparator
other treatmentse0
Setting
room conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“curds of the 50% nitrogen fertilizer treatment stored at room condition and in polythene bags could be kept 6 days & 9 days longer than other treatments, without decay.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cauliflower curds given 50% nitrogen fertilizer and stored in polythene bags lasted 9 days longer without decay than other treatments.

Treatment
50% nitrogen fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
without decaye0
Direction
longere0
Value
9 dayse0
Comparator
other treatmentse0
Setting
polythene bagse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“curds of the 50% nitrogen fertilizer treatment stored at room condition and in polythene bags could be kept 6 days & 9 days longer than other treatments, without decay.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–121 · show in text ↑

fertilization · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.