Abstract
A Field experiment was conducted to compare the effect of urea as a fertilizer on growth, yield and post harvest life of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L). Four levels of urea were compared with the recommendation of the Department of Agriculture (DOA), using a Randomized Complete Block Design. Other cultural practices and crop protection were done according to the recommendations of the DOA. The plant height at one week after transplanting and 50% flowering, number of leaves at 50% flowering, total leaf area at time of flowering, total number of days to flowering, and time period for curd maturity were recorded in each treatment. The average cauliflower curd yield in the field varied between 90 - 125 g/plant (3.6 – 5.0 t/ha). The results revealed the possibility of increasing N dosage up to 125% of the DOA recommendation for obtaining larger curds and a higher curd yield. Significant difference was not observed (p>0.05) among the treatments in any of the curd quality parameters measured. Even though no significant difference was observed among the post harvest quality, curds of the 50% nitrogen fertilizer treatment stored at room condition and in polythene bags could be kept 6 days & 9 days longer than other treatments, without decay. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/tar.v21i1.2592 Tropical Agricultural Research Vol. 21(1): 110-114 (2009)
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Field cauliflower curd yield ranged from 90 to 125 g per plant.
- Taxon
- cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytise0 - Outcome
- curd yielde0
- Direction
- variede0
- Value
- 90 - 125 g/plante0
- Setting
- fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The average cauliflower curd yield in the field varied between 90 - 125 g/plant (3.6 – 5.0 t/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
Field cauliflower yield ranged from 3.6 to 5.0 t/ha.
- Taxon
- cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytise0 - Outcome
- curd yielde0
- Direction
- variede0
- Value
- 3.6 – 5.0 t/hae0
- Setting
- fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The average cauliflower curd yield in the field varied between 90 - 125 g/plant (3.6 – 5.0 t/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen dosage up to 125% of the DOA recommendation produced larger cauliflower curds.
- Taxon
- Cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytist0 - Treatment
- increasing N dosage up to 125% of the DOA recommendatione0
- Outcome
- curdse0
- Direction
- largere0
- Comparator
- DOA recommendatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The results revealed the possibility of increasing N dosage up to 125% of the DOA recommendation for obtaining larger curds and a higher curd yield.”
t0“Cauliflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen dosage up to 125% of the DOA recommendation produced a higher cauliflower curd yield.
- Taxon
- Cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytist0 - Treatment
- increasing N dosage up to 125% of the DOA recommendatione0
- Outcome
- curd yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- DOA recommendatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The results revealed the possibility of increasing N dosage up to 125% of the DOA recommendation for obtaining larger curds and a higher curd yield.”
t0“Cauliflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Cauliflower curd quality parameters did not differ significantly among urea treatments.
- Taxon
- Cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytist0 - Treatment
- treatmentse0
- Outcome
- curd quality parameterse0
- Direction
- not observede0
- Comparator
- among the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Significant difference was not observed (p>0.05) among the treatments in any of the curd quality parameters measured.”
t0“Cauliflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Cauliflower curds given 50% nitrogen fertilizer and stored at room condition lasted 6 days longer without decay than other treatments.
- Taxon
- Cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytist0 - Treatment
- 50% nitrogen fertilizer treatmente0
- Outcome
- without decaye0
- Direction
- longere0
- Value
- 6 dayse0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
- Setting
- room conditione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“curds of the 50% nitrogen fertilizer treatment stored at room condition and in polythene bags could be kept 6 days & 9 days longer than other treatments, without decay.”
t0“Cauliflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Cauliflower curds given 50% nitrogen fertilizer and stored in polythene bags lasted 9 days longer without decay than other treatments.
- Taxon
- Cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytist0 - Treatment
- 50% nitrogen fertilizer treatmente0
- Outcome
- without decaye0
- Direction
- longere0
- Value
- 9 dayse0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
- Setting
- polythene bagse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“curds of the 50% nitrogen fertilizer treatment stored at room condition and in polythene bags could be kept 6 days & 9 days longer than other treatments, without decay.”
t0“Cauliflower”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.