Paper · 1984 · Journal of Phytopathology

Control of Gaeumannomyces graminis Var. tritici in Wheat by Isolates of the G. graminis var. graminis/Phialophora sp. (Lobed Hyphopodia) Complex under Field Conditions

J.B. Speakman

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In an experiment carried out under field conditions, wheat inoculated with Gaeumanmyces graminis var. tritics had less take‐all and yielded significantly more grain when simultaneously inoculated with G. graminis var. graminis and a lobed hyphopodiate phialophora sp. then when unprotected with these fungi.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculated wheat had less take-all than wheat without the protective fungi.

Treatment
simultaneously inoculated with G. graminis var. graminis and a lobed hyphopodiate phialophora sp.e0
Interactor
Gaeumanmyces graminis var. triticse0pathogen
Second interactor
G. graminis var. graminisGaeumannomyces graminise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
take‐alle0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
a lobed hyphopodiate phialophora sp.e0
Comparator
unprotected with these fungie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gaeumannomyces graminis
Gaeumannomyces graminis · Second interactorWilliam M. Brown Jr. · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat inoculated with Gaeumanmyces graminis var. tritics had less take‐all and yielded significantly more grain when simultaneously inoculated with G. graminis var. graminis and a lobed hyphopodiate phialophora sp. then when unprotected with these fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculated wheat yielded significantly more grain than wheat without the protective fungi.

Treatment
simultaneously inoculated with G. graminis var. graminis and a lobed hyphopodiate phialophora sp.e0
Interactor
Gaeumanmyces graminis var. triticse0pathogen
Second interactor
G. graminis var. graminisGaeumannomyces graminise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
graine0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
a lobed hyphopodiate phialophora sp.e0
Comparator
unprotected with these fungie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gaeumannomyces graminis
Gaeumannomyces graminis · Second interactorWilliam M. Brown Jr. · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat inoculated with Gaeumanmyces graminis var. tritics had less take‐all and yielded significantly more grain when simultaneously inoculated with G. graminis var. graminis and a lobed hyphopodiate phialophora sp. then when unprotected with these fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–316 · show in text ↑

Gaeumannomyces graminis · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.