Paper · 1972 · Annals of Applied Biology

Effect of Ophiobolus graminis infection on the growth of wheat and barley

M. J. C. ASHER

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
19
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Glasshouse experiments are reported, in which the development of young wheat and barley plants was examined following inoculation with Ophiobolus graminis (Sacc.) Sacc. The dry weight, leaf area, tiller number and water content of the shoot were reduced by infection. Reductions were equally severe in wheat and barley. The seminal root system of both was severely attacked and its growth retarded. Inoculated plants, however, translocated a greater proportion of their total assimilates to the root system and produced more adventitious roots than healthy plants. As a result there was an increase in both the number and proportion of healthy roots on these plants following the initial infection of their root systems. This effect was more pronounced in barley than in wheat. It is suggested that this may in part account for the reported relative tolerance of barley to take‐all attack under field conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection reduced shoot dry weight, leaf area and tiller number in wheat and barley.

Treatment
inoculation with Ophiobolus graminise2
Interactor
Ophiobolus graminisGaeumannomyces graminise2pathogen
Outcome
dry weight, leaf area, tiller numbere0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gaeumannomyces graminis
Gaeumannomyces graminis · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr. · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry weight, leaf area, tiller number and water content of the shoot were reduced by infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–274 · show in text ↑
e1

“young wheat and barley plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculation with Ophiobolus graminis (Sacc.) Sacc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection reduced shoot water content in wheat and barley.

Treatment
inoculation with Ophiobolus graminise2
Interactor
Ophiobolus graminisGaeumannomyces graminise2pathogen
Outcome
water content of the shoote0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gaeumannomyces graminis
Gaeumannomyces graminis · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr. · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water content of the shoot were reduced by infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–274 · show in text ↑
e1

“young wheat and barley plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculation with Ophiobolus graminis (Sacc.) Sacc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–176 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth reductions were equally severe in wheat and barley.

Outcome
Reductionse0
Direction
equally severee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions were equally severe in wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection severely attacked and retarded seminal root growth in both crops.

Treatment
inoculation with Ophiobolus graminise2
Interactor
Ophiobolus graminisGaeumannomyces graminise2pathogen
Outcome
seminal root systeme0
Direction
retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gaeumannomyces graminis
Gaeumannomyces graminis · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr. · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seminal root system of both was severely attacked and its growth retarded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–405 · show in text ↑
e1

“young wheat and barley plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculation with Ophiobolus graminis (Sacc.) Sacc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected plants sent a greater share of assimilates to roots and made more adventitious roots than healthy plants.

Treatment
inoculation with Ophiobolus graminise2
Interactor
Ophiobolus graminisGaeumannomyces graminise2pathogen
Outcome
greater proportion of their total assimilates to the root system and produced more adventitious rootse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
healthy plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gaeumannomyces graminis
Gaeumannomyces graminis · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr. · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plants, however, translocated a greater proportion of their total assimilates to the root system and produced more adventitious roots than healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–571 · show in text ↑
e1

“young wheat and barley plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculation with Ophiobolus graminis (Sacc.) Sacc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–176 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Healthy roots increased in number and proportion after initial infection.

Outcome
number and proportion of healthy rootse0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was an increase in both the number and proportion of healthy roots on these plants following the initial infection of their root systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–727 · show in text ↑
e1

“young wheat and barley plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The healthy-root response was more pronounced in barley than wheat.

Outcome
effecte0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This effect was more pronounced in barley than in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–784 · show in text ↑

Gaeumannomyces graminis · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Gaeumannomyces graminis · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

88 papers: 66 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

inoculation · soil: physics · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 83 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 476 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 549 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.