Paper · 1975 · Agronomy Journal

Vernalization of Winter Field Pea1

I. C. Trevino; G. A. Murray

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the response of winter field peas ( Pisum sativum spp. arvense L.) to vernalization is essential for cultural and breeding programs designed to improve seed yield and quality. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of vernalization on flower position, earliness of flowering, yield, and protein content of ‘Fenn’ winter field pea. Seedlings, 2‐days‐old, were vernalized at 2 to 4 C for 0 to 4 and 0 to 5 weeks in two consecutive experiments. Vernalization significantly accelerated flowering by reducing the number of nodes and days after treatment to the first flower. Progressive acceleration of flowering was observed as duration of exposure to cold treatment increased. Maximum acceleration of flowering was attained by exposure to 4 weeks of cold temperature. Vernalization slightly inhibited vegetative dry matter production and seed yield. Percent protein in the seed was slightly increased by vernalization because equal amounts of N were translocated to smaller sinks induced by the cold treatment. Total seed protein/plant was not affected by the cold treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vernalization significantly accelerated flowering of winter field pea by reducing the number of nodes and the days after treatment to the first flower.

Taxon
Winter Field Peat0
Treatment
Vernalizatione0
Outcome
number of nodes and days after treatment to the first flowere0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Vernalization significantly accelerated flowering by reducing the number of nodes and days after treatment to the first flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Field Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering of winter field pea was progressively accelerated as the duration of cold exposure increased.

Taxon
Winter Field Peat0
Treatment
duration of exposure to cold treatmente0
Outcome
acceleration of floweringe0
Direction
Progressivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Progressive acceleration of flowering was observed as duration of exposure to cold treatment increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Field Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum acceleration of flowering in winter field pea was reached with 4 weeks of cold exposure.

Taxon
Winter Field Peat0
Treatment
4 weeks of cold temperaturee0
Outcome
acceleration of floweringe0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum acceleration of flowering was attained by exposure to 4 weeks of cold temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Field Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vernalization slightly inhibited vegetative dry matter production and seed yield of winter field pea.

Taxon
Winter Field Peat0
Treatment
Vernalizatione0
Outcome
vegetative dry matter production and seed yielde0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Vernalization slightly inhibited vegetative dry matter production and seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Field Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vernalization slightly increased the percent protein in the seed of winter field pea.

Taxon
Winter Field Peat0
Treatment
vernalizatione0
Outcome
Percent protein in the seede0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Percent protein in the seed was slightly increased by vernalization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Field Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute the higher seed protein percentage to equal amounts of N being translocated to the smaller sinks induced by the cold treatment.

Taxon
Winter Field Peat0
Treatment
cold treatmente0
Outcome
Percent protein in the seede0
Qualifier
equal amounts of N were translocated to smaller sinkse0

Verbatim

e0

“Percent protein in the seed was slightly increased by vernalization because equal amounts of N were translocated to smaller sinks induced by the cold treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Field Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total seed protein per plant was not affected by the cold treatment.

Taxon
Winter Field Peat0
Treatment
cold treatmente0
Outcome
Total seed protein/plante0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total seed protein/plant was not affected by the cold treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Field Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑

cold · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

cold · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

cold · phenology · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.