Paper · 2007 · Compost Science & Utilization

Compost Maturity Effects on Nitrogen and Carbon Mineralization and Plant Growth

T.S. Griffin; M. Hutchinson

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
50
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Improved predictive relationships between compost maturity and nitrogen (N) availability are needed. A total of 13 compost samples were collected from a single windrow over a 91 d period. Compost stability and maturity were assessed using both standard chemical analyses (total C and N, mineral N, total volatile solids) and other methods (CO2 evolution, commercial maturity kits, and neutral detergent fiber, and lignin). Compost N and carbon (C) were evaluated during a 130 d aerobic incubation in a sandy loam soil after each compost was applied at 200 mg total kg−1 soil. The effect of compost maturity on plant growth was evaluated by growing two ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) crops and one barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop in succession in compost-amended soil under greenhouse conditions. Potential phytotoxicity from compost was assessed by growing tomato (Lypersicum esculentum L.) seedlings in compost-amended soil. Regression and correlation analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between compost maturity parameters, the rate and extent of net N and C mineralization, plant yield and N uptake, and phytotoxicity. Commonly used maturity parameters like total C, total N, and C:N ratio were poorly correlated with the rate and extent of mineralization, and with plant growth parameters. The N mineralization rate during the first 48 d of aerobic incubation was strongly correlated (r= −0.82 to −0.86) to compost fiber and lignin concentration, and to the Maturity Index (r=0.85). Trends in C mineralization were similar. There were few differences in C mineralization between composts after 48 d of aerobic incubation in soil. Ryegrass harvested 35 and 70 d after compost application was not strongly affected by compost maturity, and relatively immature composts were phytotoxic to tomato seedlings. Methods of characterizing compost maturity and stability that more realistically reflect the composting process are better predictors of N release and potential plant inhibition after incorporation into soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common maturity parameters correlated poorly with plant growth parameters.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliume1
Compound
total Ce0
Outcome
plant growth parameterse0
Direction
poorly correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Commonly used maturity parameters like total C, total N, and C:N ratio were poorly correlated with the rate and extent of mineralization, and with plant growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1303 · show in text ↑
e1

“two ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) crops and one barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–727 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato (Lypersicum esculentum L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–899 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ryegrass harvested 35 and 70 days after compost application was not strongly affected by compost maturity.

Taxon
RyegrassLoliume0
Treatment
compost maturitye0
Outcome
Ryegrass harvestede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ryegrass harvested 35 and 70 d after compost application was not strongly affected by compost maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relatively immature composts were phytotoxic to tomato seedlings.

Treatment
relatively immature compostse0
Outcome
phytotoxic to tomato seedlingse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relatively immature composts were phytotoxic to tomato seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1753–1817 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude process-reflecting compost methods better predict plant inhibition after soil incorporation.

Outcome
potential plant inhibitione0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
Methods of characterizing compost maturity and stabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Methods of characterizing compost maturity and stability that more realistically reflect the composting process are better predictors of N release and potential plant inhibition after incorporation into soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–2026 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lypersicum esculentum L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–899 · show in text ↑

fertilization · crop injury · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.