Paper · 2007 · Weed Science

Biological Control Agent for Rice Weeds from Protoplast Fusion betweenCurvularia lunataandHelminthosporium gramineum

Z. B. Zhang; N. R. Burgos; J. P. Zhang; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The advancement of biological weed control is limited by the slow development of effective, broader-spectrum biological control agents. Protoplast fusion was carried out between the Helminthosporium gramineum subsp. echinochloae (HGE) strain, HM1, and Curvularia lunata (CL) to breed new strains with improved biocontrol efficiency. The HM1 strain was derived from HGE by ultraviolet (UV) treatment. Conditions for protoplast fusion were optimized, including lytic enzyme mixtures and incubation time. The efficacy of lytic enzyme mixtures on cell wall digestion was also compared. The most effective lytic enzyme mixture for CL was 2% lywallzyme plus 2% snailase and for HM1, 2% cellulase plus 2% snailase. The optimum incubation time was 16 h for CL and 24 h for HM1. All fusant strains exhibited similar morphological and conidial properties to the HM1 parent. A total of 1,360 fusant strains were produced, 136 of which were randomly selected for characterization. Seven fusant strains showed improved spore productivity and four fusant strains had increased production of the phytotoxin ophiobolin A, compared with HM1. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis of the fusant strains showed that the seven phytoactive fusant strains had a high similarity index (95 to 99%) to the parent HM1, but low similarity (22 to 26%) to the parent CL. Ethyl acetate extract of the culture broth and mycelia effectively controlled major weeds in rice production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CL cell wall mixture was most effective.

Interactor
CLe0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
most effective lytic enzyme mixturee0
Value
2% lywallzyme plus 2% snailasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective lytic enzyme mixture for CL was 2% lywallzyme plus 2% snailase and for HM1, 2% cellulase plus 2% snailase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The HM1 cell wall mixture was most effective.

Interactor
HM1e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
most effective lytic enzyme mixturee0
Value
2% cellulase plus 2% snailasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective lytic enzyme mixture for CL was 2% lywallzyme plus 2% snailase and for HM1, 2% cellulase plus 2% snailase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal CL incubation time was 16 h.

Interactor
CLe0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
optimum incubation timee0
Value
16 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum incubation time was 16 h for CL and 24 h for HM1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal HM1 incubation time was 24 h.

Interactor
HM1e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
optimum incubation timee0
Value
24 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum incubation time was 16 h for CL and 24 h for HM1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All fusants resembled HM1 in morphology and conidia.

Interactor
fusant strainse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
similar morphological and conidial propertiese0
Comparator
HM1 parente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All fusant strains exhibited similar morphological and conidial properties to the HM1 parent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven fusants improved spore productivity over HM1.

Interactor
fusant strainse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fusant strains showed improved spore productivitye0
Direction
improvede0
Value
Sevene0
Comparator
HM1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seven fusant strains showed improved spore productivity and four fusant strains had increased production of the phytotoxin ophiobolin A, compared with HM1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four fusants increased ophiobolin A production over HM1.

Interactor
fusant strainse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fusant strains had increased production of the phytotoxin ophiobolin Ae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
foure0
Comparator
HM1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seven fusant strains showed improved spore productivity and four fusant strains had increased production of the phytotoxin ophiobolin A, compared with HM1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven phytoactive fusants had 95 to 99% similarity to HM1.

Interactor
fusant strainse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
similarity indexe0
Direction
highe0
Value
95 to 99%e0
Comparator
parent HM1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seven phytoactive fusant strains had a high similarity index (95 to 99%) to the parent HM1, but low similarity (22 to 26%) to the parent CL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1352 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven phytoactive fusants had 22 to 26% similarity to CL.

Interactor
fusant strainse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
similaritye0
Direction
lowe0
Value
22 to 26%e0
Comparator
parent CLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seven phytoactive fusant strains had a high similarity index (95 to 99%) to the parent HM1, but low similarity (22 to 26%) to the parent CL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1352 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Culture broth and mycelial extracts controlled major rice weeds.

Treatment
Ethyl acetate extract of the culture broth and myceliae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
major weedse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethyl acetate extract of the culture broth and mycelia effectively controlled major weeds in rice production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1462 · show in text ↑

botanical · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.