Paper · 1997 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Responses of directly seeded wetland rice to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation

M.Z. Solaiman; H. Hirata

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
41
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The mycorrhizal enhancement of plant growth is generally attributed to increased nutrients uptake. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation on the growth and nutrient uptake of directly seeded wetland rice. Seeds were germinated and inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi or left uninoculated. The plants were grown at 60% of ‐0.03 MPa to establish the mycorrhizas. After 5 weeks, half of the pots were harvested and the rest were flooded with deionized water to maintain 3–5 cm of standing water until harvesting (122 days after sowing). Mycorrhizal fungal colonization of rice roots was 36.2% at harvest. Mycorrhizal fungi inoculated rice seedlings grew better compared to uninoculated seedlings and had increased grain yield (10%) at the harvesting stage. Shoot and root growth were effectively increased by AMF inoculation at the harvesting stage. The nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) acquisition of direct seeding wetland rice were significantly increased by AMF inoculation. The AMF enhanced N and P translocation through the hyphae from soils to roots/shoots to grains effectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice root colonization by mycorrhizal fungi reached 36.2% at harvest.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Interactor
Mycorrhizal fungale0symbiont
Outcome
Mycorrhizal fungal colonization of rice rootse0
Value
36.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal fungal colonization of rice roots was 36.2% at harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation increased rice seedling growth versus uninoculated seedlings.

Taxon
rice seedlingsOryza sativae0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal fungi inoculatede0
Interactor
Mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
rice seedlings grew bettere0
Direction
grew bettere0
Comparator
uninoculated seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal fungi inoculated rice seedlings grew better compared to uninoculated seedlings and had increased grain yield (10%) at the harvesting stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation increased rice grain yield by 10% at harvest.

Taxon
rice seedlingsOryza sativae0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal fungi inoculatede0
Interactor
Mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
uninoculated seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal fungi inoculated rice seedlings grew better compared to uninoculated seedlings and had increased grain yield (10%) at the harvesting stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased shoot and root growth at harvest.

Taxon
wetland ricet0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
Shoot and root growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot and root growth were effectively increased by AMF inoculation at the harvesting stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“wetland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation significantly increased N and P acquisition by wetland rice.

Taxon
wetland ricee0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) acquisitione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) acquisition of direct seeding wetland rice were significantly increased by AMF inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1067 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF enhanced N and P translocation via hyphae from soil through roots and shoots to grain.

Taxon
wetland ricet0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
N and P translocatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
through the hyphae from soils to roots/shoots to grainse0

Verbatim

e0

“The AMF enhanced N and P translocation through the hyphae from soils to roots/shoots to grains effectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“wetland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

inoculation · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

418 papers: 382 positive, 36 negative or no effect

381 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

414 papers more in this group

See all 418 papers →

mycorrhiza · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.