Paper · 1977 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Control of the Germination Responses ofAmaranthus retroflexusL. Seeds by their Parental Photothermal Environment

J. KIGEL; M. OFIR; D. KOLLER

11
claims
29
verbatim quotes
61
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Germination responses of the seeds of Amaranthus retroflexus L. were affected by the photo period, temperature, and level of solar radiation experienced by their parent plants. Seeds from parents grown continuously in short days (SD, 8 h) lost post-harvest dormancy more rapidly and had a higher dark germination, as well as a greater responsiveness (at 30 °C) to pretreatments at low temperature (5 or 10 °C) and to short illuminations, than seeds from parents grown continuously in long days (LD, 16 h). Dark germination and responsiveness of the seeds to promotive treatments were both higher when their parents were transferred at flowering from LD to SD than when grown continuously in LD. These responses were lower when their parents were similarly transferred from SD to LD than when grown continuously in SD. The promotive effects of parental post-flowering SD on dark germination (at 30 °C) were enhanced by reduction of parental temperature (from 27/22 °C to 22/17 °C), but the respon siveness of the seeds to low temperature pretreatment was reduced. Inflorescences developing in LD produced seed with higher germinability when flowering was notinduced(LD throughout) than when it was induced (either by SD till flowering, or by three SD cycles when 4-5 leaves appeared). Reduced levels of solar radiation had opposite effects in the different parental photoperiods : dark germination and the responsiveness to low temperature pretreatments were reduced in LD, but were increased in SD. Differences in the germination responses resulting from differences in the parental environ ment could not be correlated with differences in seed coat thickness or seed dry weight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parental short days accelerated loss of postharvest seed dormancy versus long days.

Taxon
Amaranthus retroflexus L.Amaranthus retroflexuse2
Treatment
short days (SD, 8 h)e0
Outcome
post-harvest dormancye0
Direction
more rapidlye0
Comparator
long days (LD, 16 h)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seeds from parents grown continuously in short days (SD, 8 h) lost post-harvest dormancy more rapidly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–278 · show in text ↑
e1

“than seeds from parents grown continuously in long days (LD, 16 h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–504 · show in text ↑
e2

“Amaranthus retroflexus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parental short days raised dark germination versus long days.

Taxon
Amaranthus retroflexus L.Amaranthus retroflexuse3
Treatment
short days (SD, 8 h)e1
Outcome
dark germinatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
long days (LD, 16 h)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher dark germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–312 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seeds from parents grown continuously in short days (SD, 8 h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–238 · show in text ↑
e2

“than seeds from parents grown continuously in long days (LD, 16 h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–504 · show in text ↑
e3

“Amaranthus retroflexus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parental short days increased responsiveness to low temperature pretreatment and short illumination.

Taxon
Amaranthus retroflexus L.Amaranthus retroflexuse3
Treatment
short days (SD, 8 h)e1
Outcome
responsiveness (at 30 °C) to pretreatments at low temperature (5 or 10 °C) and to short illuminationse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
long days (LD, 16 h)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a greater responsiveness (at 30 °C) to pretreatments at low temperature (5 or 10 °C) and to short illuminations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–436 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seeds from parents grown continuously in short days (SD, 8 h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–238 · show in text ↑
e2

“than seeds from parents grown continuously in long days (LD, 16 h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–504 · show in text ↑
e3

“Amaranthus retroflexus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Switching parents from long to short days at flowering raised dark germination and response to promotive treatments versus continuous long days.

Taxon
Amaranthus retroflexus L.Amaranthus retroflexuse1
Treatment
transferred at flowering from LD to SDe0
Outcome
Dark germination and responsiveness of the seeds to promotive treatmentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
grown continuously in LDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dark germination and responsiveness of the seeds to promotive treatments were both higher when their parents were transferred at flowering from LD to SD than when grown continuously in LD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–693 · show in text ↑
e1

“Amaranthus retroflexus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Switching parents from short to long days lowered these responses versus continuous short days.

Taxon
Amaranthus retroflexus L.Amaranthus retroflexuse2
Treatment
transferred from SD to LDe0
Outcome
Dark germination and responsiveness of the seeds to promotive treatmentse1
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
grown continuously in SDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These responses were lower when their parents were similarly transferred from SD to LD than when grown continuously in SD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–816 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dark germination and responsiveness of the seeds to promotive treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–578 · show in text ↑
e2

“Amaranthus retroflexus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower parental temperature enhanced short day promotion of dark germination.

Taxon
Amaranthus retroflexus L.Amaranthus retroflexuse1
Treatment
reduction of parental temperature (from 27/22 °C to 22/17 °C)e0
Outcome
dark germinatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promotive effects of parental post-flowering SD on dark germination (at 30 °C) were enhanced by reduction of parental temperature (from 27/22 °C to 22/17 °C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–979 · show in text ↑
e1

“Amaranthus retroflexus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower parental temperature reduced offspring response to low temperature pretreatment.

Taxon
Amaranthus retroflexus L.Amaranthus retroflexuse2
Treatment
reduction of parental temperature (from 27/22 °C to 22/17 °C)e1
Outcome
respon siveness of the seeds to low temperature pretreatmente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“respon siveness of the seeds to low temperature pretreatment was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1061 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduction of parental temperature (from 27/22 °C to 22/17 °C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–979 · show in text ↑
e2

“Amaranthus retroflexus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds from inflorescences developing in long days germinated more when flowering was not induced.

Taxon
Amaranthus retroflexus L.Amaranthus retroflexuse1
Treatment
LD throughoute0
Outcome
germinabilitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
induced (either by SD till flowering, or by three SD cycles when 4-5 leaves appeared)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inflorescences developing in LD produced seed with higher germinability when flowering was notinduced(LD throughout) than when it was induced (either by SD till flowering, or by three SD cycles when 4-5 leaves appeared)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1282 · show in text ↑
e1

“Amaranthus retroflexus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced parental solar radiation lowered dark germination and cold response in long days.

Taxon
Amaranthus retroflexus L.Amaranthus retroflexuse1
Treatment
Reduced levels of solar radiatione0
Outcome
dark germination and the responsiveness to low temperature pretreatmentse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced levels of solar radiation had opposite effects in the different parental photoperiods : dark germination and the responsiveness to low temperature pretreatments were reduced in LD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1471 · show in text ↑
e1

“Amaranthus retroflexus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced parental solar radiation raised dark germination and cold response in short days.

Taxon
Amaranthus retroflexus L.Amaranthus retroflexuse1
Treatment
Reduced levels of solar radiatione0
Outcome
dark germination and the responsiveness to low temperature pretreatmentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced levels of solar radiation had opposite effects in the different parental photoperiods : dark germination and the responsiveness to low temperature pretreatments were reduced in LD, but were increased in SD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1497 · show in text ↑
e1

“Amaranthus retroflexus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parental environment effects on germination did not correlate with seed coat thickness or dry weight.

Taxon
Amaranthus retroflexus L.Amaranthus retroflexuse1
Organ / stage
seed coate0
Outcome
Differences in the germination responsese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in the germination responses resulting from differences in the parental environ ment could not be correlated with differences in seed coat thickness or seed dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1678 · show in text ↑
e1

“Amaranthus retroflexus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑

stage · growth · Amaranthus retroflexus (redroot amaranth)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

light · growth · Amaranthus retroflexus (redroot amaranth)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.