Paper · 1995 · International Journal of Pest Management

Antifeedant activity of solvent extracts of neem seed kernel againstSpodoptera lituraF. and their persistency against sunlight through encapsulation

S. Mohapatra; S. K. Sawarkar; H. P. Patnaik; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Different solvent extracts of neem seed kernels were evaluated against Spodoptera litura F. on cauliflower, Brassica oleracea var. botrytis leaves. Based on this evaluation, aqueous extract was dissolved in ethanol, and methanol extract in ethanol, and dissolved parts were designated as fraction I and fraction II, respectively. The extracts having more antifeedant activity were encapsulated to achieve stability against the sunlight. Among the solvent extracts tested at 1.0% concentration, methanol extract provided maximum protection (100%) of the leaves followed by ethanol (98.39%) and aqueous (93.01%) extracts. Fraction I and fraction 11 were equally effective at 0.1 % concentration against S. litura larvae and checked more than 70% of leaf damage. However, such extracts were found to be unstable when exposed to sunlight. The pre‐gelatinized starch‐encapsulated products, viz. ρre‐gel I and pre‐gel II were quite stable and afforded more than 68.0% protection to the cauliflower leaves even after 6 days of exposure to sunlight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanol extract gave maximum leaf protection of 100% at 1.0%.

Treatment
methanol extracte0
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat0pest
Outcome
protectione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
1.0% concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the solvent extracts tested at 1.0% concentration, methanol extract provided maximum protection (100%) of the leaves followed by ethanol (98.39%) and aqueous (93.01%) extracts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–628 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera litura”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“on cauliflower, Brassica oleracea var. botrytis leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol extract gave 98.39% leaf protection at 1.0%.

Treatment
ethanole0
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat0pest
Outcome
protectione0
Value
98.39%e0
Qualifier
1.0% concentratione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the solvent extracts tested at 1.0% concentration, methanol extract provided maximum protection (100%) of the leaves followed by ethanol (98.39%) and aqueous (93.01%) extracts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–628 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera litura”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“on cauliflower, Brassica oleracea var. botrytis leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous extract gave 93.01% leaf protection at 1.0%.

Treatment
aqueouse0
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat0pest
Outcome
protectione0
Value
93.01%e0
Qualifier
1.0% concentratione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the solvent extracts tested at 1.0% concentration, methanol extract provided maximum protection (100%) of the leaves followed by ethanol (98.39%) and aqueous (93.01%) extracts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–628 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera litura”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“on cauliflower, Brassica oleracea var. botrytis leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fraction I checked over 70% of leaf damage at 0.1 %.

Treatment
Fraction Ie0
Interactor
S. lituraSpodoptera liturae0pest
Outcome
leaf damagee0
Direction
checkede0
Value
more than 70%e0
Qualifier
0.1 % concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fraction I and fraction 11 were equally effective at 0.1 % concentration against S. litura larvae and checked more than 70% of leaf damage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“on cauliflower, Brassica oleracea var. botrytis leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fraction 11 checked over 70% of leaf damage at 0.1 %.

Treatment
fraction 11e0
Interactor
S. lituraSpodoptera liturae0pest
Outcome
leaf damagee0
Direction
checkede0
Value
more than 70%e0
Qualifier
0.1 % concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fraction I and fraction 11 were equally effective at 0.1 % concentration against S. litura larvae and checked more than 70% of leaf damage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“on cauliflower, Brassica oleracea var. botrytis leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–155 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected extracts were unstable in sunlight.

Treatment
such extractse0
Outcome
unstable when exposed to sunlighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, such extracts were found to be unstable when exposed to sunlight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“on cauliflower, Brassica oleracea var. botrytis leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Encapsulated pre-gel I remained stable and protected cauliflower leaves after six days of sunlight.

Treatment
ρre‐gel Ie0
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat0pest
Outcome
protection to the cauliflower leavese0
Value
more than 68.0%e0
Qualifier
after 6 days of exposure to sunlighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pre‐gelatinized starch‐encapsulated products, viz. ρre‐gel I and pre‐gel II were quite stable and afforded more than 68.0% protection to the cauliflower leaves even after 6 days of exposure to sunlight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera litura”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Encapsulated pre-gel II remained stable and protected cauliflower leaves after six days of sunlight.

Treatment
pre‐gel IIe0
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat0pest
Outcome
protection to the cauliflower leavese0
Value
more than 68.0%e0
Qualifier
after 6 days of exposure to sunlighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pre‐gelatinized starch‐encapsulated products, viz. ρre‐gel I and pre‐gel II were quite stable and afforded more than 68.0% protection to the cauliflower leaves even after 6 days of exposure to sunlight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera litura”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 · show in text ↑

botanical · Spodoptera litura · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.