Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Food Science & Technology

Chitosan nanoparticle coatings reduce microbial growth on fresh-cut apples while not affecting quality attributes

Lucimeire Pilon; Poliana C Spricigo; Marcela Miranda; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
141
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract This study addressed the effects of chitosan-based nanoparticles on microbiological quality, colour, polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD) and firmness of fresh-cut ‘Gala’ apple slices during storage at 5 °C for 10 days. The treatments carried out were as follows: (i) slices pulverised with 110-nm chitosan nanoparticles, (ii) slices pulverised with 300-nm chitosan nanoparticles, (iii) 2 g L−1 chitosan dissolved in 2% citric acid and (iv) noncoated samples. There was an increase in chroma and a proportional decrease in hue angle and lightness. Browning of the slices coated with conventional chitosan and control was slightly intense than those coated with chitosan nanoparticles of 110 and 300 nm. The PPO and PDO activities increased with time for all samples, with irrelevant difference among the treatments. Flesh firmness did not change for any treatment and period. Coatings with chitosan nanoparticles of 110 nm showed higher antimicrobial activity against moulds and yeasts, and mesophilic and psychrotrophic bacteria than the other treatments. No Salmonella, and total and faecal coliforms were detected. This investigation supports the potential use of chitosan nanoparticles as edible coatings in controlling microbial activity in fresh-cut apples.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chroma increased during storage of fresh-cut Gala apple slices.

Outcome
chromae0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was an increase in chroma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–509 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hue angle decreased proportionally during storage of fresh-cut Gala apple slices.

Outcome
hue anglee0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a proportional decrease in hue angle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lightness decreased proportionally during storage of fresh-cut Gala apple slices.

Outcome
lightnesse0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a proportional decrease in hue angle and lightness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–564 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Browning was slightly more intense under conventional chitosan coating than under nanoparticle coatings.

Treatment
conventional chitosane0
Outcome
Browninge0
Direction
slightly intensee0
Comparator
chitosan nanoparticles of 110 and 300 nme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Browning of the slices coated with conventional chitosan and control was slightly intense than those coated with chitosan nanoparticles of 110 and 300 nm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Browning was slightly more intense in controls than with nanoparticle coatings.

Treatment
controle0
Outcome
Browninge0
Direction
slightly intensee0
Comparator
chitosan nanoparticles of 110 and 300 nme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Browning of the slices coated with conventional chitosan and control was slightly intense than those coated with chitosan nanoparticles of 110 and 300 nm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PPO activity rose over time in all apple slice treatments with little difference among treatments.

Gene
PPOe0
Outcome
PPO and PDO activitiese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
irrelevant difference among the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PPO and PDO activities increased with time for all samples, with irrelevant difference among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PDO activity rose over time in all apple slice treatments with little difference among treatments.

Gene
PDOe0
Outcome
PPO and PDO activitiese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
irrelevant difference among the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PPO and PDO activities increased with time for all samples, with irrelevant difference among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple flesh firmness did not change under any treatment or storage period.

Outcome
Flesh firmnesse0
Direction
did not changee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flesh firmness did not change for any treatment and period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 110 nm chitosan nanoparticle coating had higher antimicrobial activity against moulds and yeasts than other treatments.

Treatment
chitosan nanoparticles of 110 nme0
Interactor
moulds and yeastse0other
Outcome
antimicrobial activity against moulds and yeastse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coatings with chitosan nanoparticles of 110 nm showed higher antimicrobial activity against moulds and yeasts, and mesophilic and psychrotrophic bacteria than the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 110 nm chitosan nanoparticle coating had higher antimicrobial activity against mesophilic and psychrotrophic bacteria.

Treatment
chitosan nanoparticles of 110 nme0
Interactor
mesophilic and psychrotrophic bacteriae0other
Outcome
antimicrobial activity against moulds and yeasts, and mesophilic and psychrotrophic bacteriae0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coatings with chitosan nanoparticles of 110 nm showed higher antimicrobial activity against moulds and yeasts, and mesophilic and psychrotrophic bacteria than the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salmonella, total coliforms, and faecal coliforms were undetected in stored apple slices.

Interactor
SalmonellaSalmonellae0other
Outcome
Salmonella, and total and faecal coliformse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Salmonella
Salmonella · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)NIAID : These high-resolution (300 dpi) images may be downloaded directly from this site. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No Salmonella, and total and faecal coliforms were detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors support chitosan nanoparticles as coatings for microbial control in fresh-cut apples.

Outcome
potential use of chitosan nanoparticles as edible coatings in controlling microbial activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This investigation supports the potential use of chitosan nanoparticles as edible coatings in controlling microbial activity in fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1280 · show in text ↑

chitosan · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nanoparticle · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.