Paper · 2011 · Journal of Food Quality

EFFECT OF PE/AG2O NANO‐PACKAGING ON THE QUALITY OF APPLE SLICES

LING ZHOU; SINING LV; GUIPING HE; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
55
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Effects of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) packaging and nano‐structured silver‐polyethylene (PE/Ag 2 O) packaging on the overall sensory quality, color, weight and solute loss of fresh‐cut apples stored at 5 and 15C were studied in this research. Results showed that, compared with normal LDPE packaging, the PE/Ag 2 O packaging helped to maintain the freshness of apple slices. Nano‐structured PE/Ag 2 O bag delayed apple browning and decreased the weight loss of apple slices during storage. In addition, it can also prevent apple slices from microbial spoilage. As a result, the quality of apple slices saved at 5C in PE/Ag 2 O bag was acceptable in 12 days, while those held in LDPE bag showed some deterioration in 6 days. Furthermore, considering the potential health risk resulting from silver leak, the safety of PE/Ag 2 O bag was evaluated, and the result indicated an acceptable safety for food packaging. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS Types of nano‐structured bags are recently commercialized for food packaging in many countries, but few documents report their performance in quality maintenance. This study indicates that nano‐structured PE/Ag 2 O bag is effective in maintaining the freshness of apple slices with extended shelf‐life. Results of this work may be useful for promoting the acceptance and application of similar nano‐packaging in the quality maintenance of fresh‐cut products.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PE/Ag 2 O packaging maintained apple slice freshness compared with LDPE packaging.

Treatment
PE/Ag 2 O packaginge0
Outcome
freshness of apple slicese0
Direction
maintaine0
Comparator
normal LDPE packaginge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with normal LDPE packaging, the PE/Ag 2 O packaging helped to maintain the freshness of apple slices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–388 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE SLICES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PE/Ag 2 O bags delayed apple browning.

Treatment
Nano‐structured PE/Ag 2 O bage0
Outcome
apple browninge0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nano‐structured PE/Ag 2 O bag delayed apple browning and decreased the weight loss of apple slices during storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE SLICES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PE/Ag 2 O bags decreased apple slice weight loss during storage.

Treatment
Nano‐structured PE/Ag 2 O bage0
Outcome
weight loss of apple slicese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nano‐structured PE/Ag 2 O bag delayed apple browning and decreased the weight loss of apple slices during storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE SLICES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PE/Ag 2 O bags prevented microbial spoilage of apple slices.

Treatment
PE/AG2O NANO‐PACKAGINGt0
Outcome
microbial spoilagee0
Direction
prevente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it can also prevent apple slices from microbial spoilage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“EFFECT OF PE/AG2O NANO‐PACKAGING ON THE QUALITY OF APPLE SLICES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple slices at 5C remained acceptable for 12 days in PE/Ag 2 O bags while LDPE slices deteriorated in 6 days.

Treatment
PE/Ag 2 O bage0
Outcome
quality of apple slicese0
Value
12 dayse0
Qualifier
5Ce0
Comparator
LDPE bage0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the quality of apple slices saved at 5C in PE/Ag 2 O bag was acceptable in 12 days, while those held in LDPE bag showed some deterioration in 6 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE SLICES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PE/Ag 2 O bags showed acceptable safety for food packaging.

Outcome
acceptable safety for food packaginge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the result indicated an acceptable safety for food packaging.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE SLICES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑

silver atom · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

118 papers: 93 positive, 25 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

114 papers more in this group

See all 118 papers →

nanoparticle · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.